Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Boy Goes Missing After Deciding to Split Up With Dad—Wait, WHAT?

1

Callie called BS on this in the comments already. It really does sound suspicious. If it turns out Daddy isn't trying to relieve himself of his autistic burden, he's still guilty of stupendously bad parenting. I think it's worse than that, though.

Posted by Fnarf | August 4, 2008 10:02 AM
2

WTF Dan? Are you seriopusly accying this guy of murdering his kid? Get a grip.

Hugely irresponsible. Go lick a pit bull

Posted by Randy beavert | August 4, 2008 10:02 AM
3

Never mind, he's been found: http://www.katu.com/news/26222779.html

Daddy's still a dumbass, though.

Posted by Fnarf | August 4, 2008 10:04 AM
4

That was last night's news. This morning's news is that the boy was found, and is fine.

http://www.katu.com/news/26222779.html

Posted by bluh? | August 4, 2008 10:04 AM
5
Posted by m | August 4, 2008 10:05 AM
6

It's entirely possible for an 11yr old to go hiking in any kind of backcountry himself. I did it, almost every single weekend. On the other hand, whether or not the father intended the kid to get lost, he sure as hell is responsible and guilty of criminal negligence. Autistic? C'mon, people... This is why you should need licenses to breed.

Posted by Nate | August 4, 2008 10:05 AM
7

There's all kinds of autistic. And I'm sure the media BLOWS it way up, too... I knew a HIGHLY intelligent autistic boy, that the only thing that was different about him was he never looked you in the eyes... Other than that- you'd never know.

Posted by Cattymaran | August 4, 2008 10:06 AM
8

Jump to conclusions much?

There is a huge range in what defines "autistic". Some are profoundly dysfunctional. Some you'd hardly know unless someone told you. We don't know how it manifests in this boy. It may have no effect whatsoever on his ability to hike around in the woods, any more so than any other 11 year old.

A mistake? Sure. But it is a huge leap to be accusing of gross negligence or attempting to off his troubled kid.

Posted by Reverse Polarity | August 4, 2008 10:14 AM
9

Shouldn't the kid have been on a leash or something?

Posted by Chitty chitty Bang bang | August 4, 2008 10:17 AM
10

Hey, Dan, won't Charles get angry at you for stepping on his turf of baseless accusations?

Posted by Charles_Mudede_Is_A_Latent_Racist | August 4, 2008 10:20 AM
11

I'm sorry, but even with a non-autistic 11-year old child, splitting up while hiking in an area that is not heavily trafficked is a stupid idea. Even if he's a very experienced 11-year old hiker. At a minimum, why would you do that without some method of keeping in contact (e.g., cell that you knew worked in the area)?

Now, I think jumping to conclusions about whether the dad "intentionally" lost the son is a little much. But, at the very least, this guy needs a common sense re-alignment.

Posted by Julie | August 4, 2008 10:33 AM
12

Even for adults, splitting up in the backcountry is a really, really stupid thing to do.

Posted by Greg | August 4, 2008 10:56 AM
13

I'm sorry, I'm distracted by the story's quotes from a witness named Kayla Al-Khaledy. Try to say THAT three times fast.

Posted by Sarah | August 4, 2008 11:03 AM
14

When I was 11, sometimes I'd take a different route from my family or stepfather and they might not see me for days.

God, you nanny state plastic bag tax people are so fearful ...

Posted by Will in Seattle | August 4, 2008 11:25 AM
15

(sorry, should have said this was in the Rocky Mountains, where the nearest town was sometimes 25 miles away over mountain passes)

Posted by Will in Seattle | August 4, 2008 11:29 AM
16

And Dad was arrested for having the sense of a rock?

@11 has it. It doesn't matter whether the kid has an IQ of 500, you do not decide to leave your child to hike alone.

Posted by Emily | August 4, 2008 11:37 AM
17

Are you sure it wasn't dad who's autistic?

Posted by Vince | August 4, 2008 12:44 PM
18

@6 and 14... Just because you did it and it turned out okay doesn't mean it's not a stupid decision. I've made plenty of stupid decisions while hiking and am still here, but that doesn't lessen the stupidity.

Best case scenario, the kid was highly functional in terms of his autism, very mature for 11, and a very experienced hiker. Even under those conditions, if you think your kid can handle it, to send him off without a communication method (and, by the way, apparently without being fully-prepared, gear-wise), you're a moron.

Posted by Julie | August 4, 2008 1:31 PM
19

Like I said, you city folk and your ideas of "what's appropriate".

I used to swim across a fricking glacial lake for fun and head off with my younger brother to explore ghost towns that were 10 miles away up in the mountains. No cell, just a rough description of what we were doing.

Wusses.

Posted by Will in Seattle | August 4, 2008 1:34 PM
20

all parties in this story deserve neutering.

Posted by jim bexley-speed | August 4, 2008 1:38 PM
21

And, as an aside, autism is probably semi-selected due to people with similar outlooks on life choosing mates with similar attitudes (e.g. non-passionate, focussed, driven, etc).

Want to avoid autistic kids? Marry someone with mood swings who has fun at the parties when you sit there not getting why people go to parties.

(practical advice, actually, but don't blame me if you split up because you're too "different")

Posted by Will in Seattle | August 4, 2008 1:48 PM
22

@19: Not impressed. The Rocky Mountains are for wusses. Please, show us how tough you are by spending a couple of rainy nights wandering the Cascades with nothing but shorts and a T-shirt.

Posted by Sean | August 4, 2008 1:49 PM
23

Those swims in glacial lakes don't seem to have affected your mental capacity at all, Will. Nope. You and your awesomely hilarious theories about autism are doing just fine.

Posted by Julie | August 4, 2008 1:59 PM
24

@22 been there done that. Try six weeks wearing nothing but a green beret and a thin army uniform while it rains in the Chilcotins. And what do you think I wore when I was a kid in summer in the Rockies - a frickin suit? try shorts and a t-shirt.

Posted by Will in Seattle | August 4, 2008 2:36 PM
25

(and they're not my thoughts on autism, you even heard a layman's version this morning on KUOW at 9 am ... and various other media (TV,newspapers) this past weekend)

Posted by Will in Seattle | August 4, 2008 2:38 PM
26

@1 Thanks Fnarf. I'm super glad they found this kid, because my immediate thought was "this was not an accident."

I mean - to everyone who is acting like it was a ridiculous assumption - really?!? Considering all of the fucked up stuff that happends on a daily basis (hello random Canadian bus beheading anyone?), REALLY?!?

Posted by Callie | August 4, 2008 4:21 PM
27

@14, I think it's safe to assume that your folks WERE trying to lose you. I know I would if you were mine.

Posted by Fnarf | August 4, 2008 6:22 PM
28

I love Will in Seattle's dicksizing over how tough he was when he was a kid.

"We walked through boiling hot springs! Naked! On our hands!"

Posted by Missy Miss | August 4, 2008 7:51 PM
29

Love how he slipped in that "green beret", too. You know, come to think of it, I wore a green beret in Girl Scouts...

Posted by julie | August 5, 2008 12:09 PM

Comments Closed

Comments are closed on this post.