Comments on What's More Offensive?: The Answer(s)

I can't believe you asserted Obama is "only 50% of a man"...

@1 And I can't believe that you misspelled the word "semantics".

Can you guys just quit making racist remarks about Barack Obama altogether?

Oh, and the McCain pinata was seriously troubling as well.

Comments of this type are only minimally less offensive if done in a "Wouldn't this be ridiculous if we were actually serious?" way.

Before I can make a fully informed decision, I'd have to know what the McCain pinata is full of.

@2 Ah... douché!

The irony is so thick around here you could cut it with a knife.

(and just to clarify, I spelled touché wrong on purpose)

Well the McCain one is much funnier with his arms all bound up and his little knee broken. The Obama on is just sad, like those statutes of pudgy Italians carrying books or plates or whatever.

Somebody needs to tell ECB to get over the primary already ...

@ 5 you misspelled idiocy ( you spelled it "irony").

@4: I asked last time; Schmader says "shit," natch.

We won't support ball-less NO-Bama and will re-defeat him in November!!!

We won't support ball-less NO-Bama and will re-defeat him in November!!!

@11 ... you know, no matter how much you whine, McSame won't win.

Slog satirizing racism against Obama w lawn jokcey: smart, suave, hip.

New Yorker satirizing racism against Obama with cover: horrible, despicable, shameless.