Slog - Comments on Vote Early, Vote Often

Comment by Greg

Greg — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:07:21 -0800

Oooh! A new topic! Oh, wait...

Comment by Crying out loud

Crying out loud — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:07:41 -0800

You're becoming a one-horse cart.

Comment by Erica_C_Barnett_Is_A_Latent_Sexist

Erica_C_Barnett_Is_A_Latent_Sexist — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:14:11 -0800

Our top stories tonight:

Sexuality is sexist!

Dog bites man!

And so it goes!

Comment by J.R.

J.R. — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:15:11 -0800

Much to my surprise, they all seem to be hot.

Comment by Chris B

Chris B — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:16:48 -0800

Of course not, Erica!

Page 3 girls are always hot.

Comment by menelaus

menelaus — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:16:49 -0800

beats a flickr set of a bunch of fat attention starved hipsters at a pride parade.

Comment by Matthew

Matthew — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:18:38 -0800

Seriously, as if The Stranger never objectifies the sexually attractive? Maybe ECB should start her own feminist blog. Oh wait...

Nothing to see here.

Comment by John Galt

John Galt — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:21:38 -0800

This has to be intentional self-parody on ECB's part.

Comment by Greg

Greg — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:22:17 -0800

@1: Fuck you, sock puppet.

As for the question of the contestants' hotness or notness, I have carefully reviewed the photographs and I am pleased to answer, "hot." If all rather depressingly on the skinny side.

Comment by Mike in MO

Mike in MO — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:23:00 -0800

Well, they are in a pool. So the bikini is apropriate.

Does Erica wear a bikini? I bet she looks hot in it.

Comment by Bryce in Newbridge

Bryce in Newbridge — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:23:38 -0800

Erica where was your outrage at the wet t-shirt picso n slog last week? Oh, I forget. You are farsighted.

In other news, really class ad bank in the back pages of your paper.

Comment by Jubilation T. Cornball

Jubilation T. Cornball — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:23:50 -0800

I hope it IS page 3 girls. They are hot.

Comment by brandon

brandon — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:27:07 -0800

my word, a poll that ranks beauty contestants by their beauty. what will they think of next?

Comment by umvue

umvue — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:28:03 -0800

As @4 pointed out, they all generally seem to fall into the "hot" category. Thus I don't get the point of the voting.

I suppose it is very bad of them to post stuff on their website to attract customers and make money and stuff. The more I think of it the angrier I get. What's next? An editorial in favor of "message" t-shirts?

Comment by Jason Josephes

Jason Josephes — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:29:09 -0800

Lindsey Bluth is probably spinning in her grave.

Comment by Greg

Greg — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:29:25 -0800

Yeah, I want to second the call for Page 3 girls. Hey, and we could do Page 4 guys as well, right? Think of the gay / bi / straight female readers.

Comment by brett

brett — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:29:38 -0800

erica's right. how cheap. these women should be appreciated for their...um...intellectual capacities and, um...

Comment by Sad Comment

Sad Comment — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:31:59 -0800

Hey thanks for the tip - I am always looking for pictures of hot girls on the internet ever since my neighbor stole my binoculars and flashlight.

Comment by Fnarf

Fnarf — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:41:05 -0800

@5 -- alas, that isn't true. In fact, Page 3 girls, while always ultra-chesty, are rarely very hot at all. They're English, you see. And all they ever eat is chips. And when they turn thirty, their ankles will thicken, and they'll start wearing slippers and a housecoat to the store, and they'll look like they're sixty. But even now, when they're eighteen, they exude fry oil from every pore.

Comment by sleestak

sleestak — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:41:45 -0800

Erica, there's an ad on Slog (it's on my screen right now!) for Hump with a man (dirty, evil man) with a woman literally hanging on him while she licks his neck and he grabs her hair. And we're supposed to be offended by what, now?

Comment by Johnson

Johnson — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:47:28 -0800

OK, I'm done voting. Voted no on most of them. Too damn skinny. Their heads look too big for their bodies.

Comment by John Wurster

John Wurster — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:56:36 -0800

http://www.flickr.com/photos/12373649@N03/1284642173/

Hot or not?

Comment by vooodooo84

vooodooo84 — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:01:03 -0800

What weirds me out about this contest is that almost all the contestants are super white. The contestant from India has to be the palest person i have ever seen.

Comment by keshmeshi

keshmeshi — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:01:55 -0800

I may be imagining it, but it seems, the more you guys whine/attack, the more ECB posts. So, keep it up, goofballs.

Comment by Clint

Clint — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:03:44 -0800

@22 - I'd hit it

Comment by Dr. Zaius

Dr. Zaius — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:11:09 -0800

Exactly @24, she's obviously being a completely neurotic bitch just to generate more slog traffic. That's how pathetic the Stranger really is.

Comment by ECB

ECB — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:17:22 -0800

I think it's hilarious how much some of you people infer from a post consisting entirely of one statement of fact.

Comment by Greg

Greg — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:18:47 -0800

@24: You say that like it's a bad thing.

Comment by brandon

brandon — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:21:57 -0800

24 - so then it's win-win! or am i the only one who finds the cycle of outrage incredibly entertaining?

Comment by menelaus

menelaus — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:22:54 -0800

@22 mediocre. head and cheeks appear proportionally larger than the small framed body which triggers a gentically framed revulsion. Hips seem lateral toward the apex and unsuitable for easy birthing. But... ehhh, I'd take my chances after a couple drinks.

Comment by reverend dr dj riz

reverend dr dj riz — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:25:21 -0800

..hey erica..@27 don't act like we don't know you, mmmkay ?

Comment by Hernandez

Hernandez — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:25:26 -0800

@27 - well, let's see. Considering that nearly all of your Slog posts express some kind of outrage at something or someone, and a good portion of those posts deal with (real or perceived) sexism, misogyny, and/or the objectification of women, what are they supposed to infer from a post like this? C'mon, it's not hilarious, it's eminently predictable.

Comment by sleestak

sleestak — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:25:48 -0800

@27 - call it an educated inference.

Comment by Will in Seattle

Will in Seattle — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:26:31 -0800

In related news, PI dragged screaming and kicking into the 21st century by HotOrNot ...

But they had a previous version of this where you could vote Yes or No on a pic as well, which is then used for Most Recommended stats for a Weeks Top Pics.

Comment by Will in Seattle

Will in Seattle — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:29:43 -0800

and @9 FTW ...

Comment by Original Greg

Original Greg — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:30:16 -0800

ECB: Your post wasn't just a statement of a fact - you tagged on "What's next? Page 3 girls?" And even if you hadn't, the frequency of your sexism posts makes people comment on them as a whole, not just on whichever specific example you're currently on (which you are occasionally dead right on, like this current example, in my opinion). And really, I think you must realize that posting 35 times a day on sexism will make people think you're repetitive and reactionary, and therefore I think you must be doing it for the traffic. Which means I fell into your trap.

Comment by Johnson

Johnson — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:34:30 -0800

@22, Annie Wagner is hotter.

Comment by sleestak

sleestak — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:43:41 -0800

@36 (and others) - It seems like many people suspect that ECB (plus Charles and Josh) do these posts for the traffic, but I'm not sure I understand. How would/does this benefit the Slog writers?

And if it does somehow benefit the Slog or its writers, wouldn't that mean that ECB is exploiting these women for her own gain?

Comment by Luigi Giovanni

Luigi Giovanni — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:46:48 -0800

The Sunshine Girls are closer to home:
http://calsun.canoe.ca/SUNshineGirl/home.html

Comment by Mike in MO

Mike in MO — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:49:47 -0800

@ 25 re: 22...I'd hit all of them. Sandeep is borderline, but I gotta be honest. It wouldn't take a lot to convince me.

Also, ECB @ 27: Nice one. See, you really can be funny if you just give it a little effort.

Now about that sexy red v-neck...

Comment by scary tyler moore

scary tyler moore — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:54:01 -0800

fnarf!

how do you know an essex girl's had an orgasm?

Comment by David Wright

David Wright — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:00:30 -0800

Perhaps they are hoping this will help prop up plunging newspaper readership. Perhaps it will. What's Erica's business plan -- reprint articles from the Socialist Worker?

By the way, I don't approve of John Wurster posting that photograph. I think he should have posted this one instead.

Comment by Greg

Greg — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:01:08 -0800

@36: Dude. Seriously, knock it off. While I appreciate your eloquence on my behalf, 'Greg' and even 'Original Greg' (look it up) are mine. Don't make me send you a cease-and-desist letter.

Comment by Borat

Borat — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:05:31 -0800

None of these women strong, for pull plow.

Comment by pervy suburban dad

pervy suburban dad — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:11:28 -0800

these are the kind of statement of facts I can get behind, ya know in the hubba hubba sense. 'Cause hotties like this, ooooh boy, who needs fantasy? when the girls all look like this all the time, it's all I need to inform me of what womanhood is, and should be.

Comment by Will in Seattle

Will in Seattle — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:25:59 -0800

@39 ties with @37 for the win!

I remember my culture shock during Army training near Toronto and realizing how different those people were - that plus seeing mostly white faces (this is way back when) ...

I'll say this for Page 3 in the UK - less white and more interesting.

Comment by ftw to wis for telling us who wins

ftw to wis for telling us who wins — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:42:41 -0800

@46:
thanks will, we love you informing us who has won, you are a real Bob Costsas no wait, you are Harry Caray "Holy Cow # XX, & Blah Blah For The Win", we couldn't figure out any of the internet without ya. if you ever feel underappreciated on slog, remember it's only half as much as you deserve.

Comment by Fnarf

Fnarf — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:03:48 -0800

Right, Will, because you grew up in da ghet-to back in Kamloops or Kelowna or wherever the hell you're from.

STM @41, I don't know -- she stops talking for two seconds?

Comment by Some fly on some wall

Some fly on some wall — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:13:22 -0800

Well, it's pretty obvious who Dan and Tim decided to make walk the plank this morning at their little news meeting.

"Charles, take the day off from your race-bating posts. Josh, continue the self-fellation, you're doing a great job - um, but we still can't pay you because technically you're fired and all. Erica, I want you to pull out all stops - take down your fellow female journalists. Let's see, Pam's gone, Nicole? Eh, you did her a few weeks ago. How about this? Christine Clarridge - yeah. Go find some offense in one of her stories and then post some disparaging comments about her. Make it personal this time, too. We need the hits people! Don't forget to put on your sandpaper underpants: Look for sexism and anti-mass transportation innuendo under EVERY rock. OK team? GO! GO! GO! Teammmmmmmmm SLOG!"

Comment by a curious fly on that wall has a question

a curious fly on that wall has a question — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:25:22 -0800

Hey #49:
Where does one find these underpants made of sandpaper? I am intrigued by the notion. Could I pick some up at big-lots? Or maybe you have a DIY pattern and I could fashion some out of my stock of Home Depot p40. Thanks in advance.

Comment by One of those helpful flies

One of those helpful flies — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:48:28 -0800

@50 Any of the big-chain hardware stores have them, but your local Ace will too. They've been around for years. Usually hanging next to the fiberglass minipads and the Chore-Boy athletic supporters.

Comment by Clint

Clint — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:28:42 -0800

@38 Some online publishers pay writers for comments that they generate. I believe that the Gawker sites do it and I do have a vague recollection of one of the guest sloggers mentioning getting paid a buck for each comment. I'm not sure if it is an official policy for all sloggers, but a few of the writing styles lead me to suspect it may be.

Comment by sleestak

sleestak — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 06:06:55 -0800

@52 - Thanks for the response.

Erica (or Dan or any other Slog poster) - Care to elaborate on what, if any, the incentive structure for Slog posters is (financially or otherwise)? I do think that it's important that you inform your readers if you stand to gain from your posts. It will tell us a little something about your true motivations on these types of posts.