Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on U.S. Olympic Committee Targets the Northwest's Large, Hairy Gay Men

1

Does a bear camp in the woods? Now we know.

Posted by Fnarf | July 23, 2008 11:38 AM
2

Glad to know I'm not the only one who survived Forks...

Posted by Crispy | July 23, 2008 11:49 AM
3

Priceless.

At least she has somewhat of a sense of humor.

This should be the SLOG POST OF THE DAY.

Posted by HL | July 23, 2008 11:50 AM
4

Hee-larious! Even more so for the begrudging admission Mr. Fotter's response elicited from the USOC lawyer, that um, gee, other places and entities are also known by the word "Olympic", and um, so, yeah, we don't really have EXCLUSIVE right to that word, like we, er, initially claimed we had.

A lesson to be filed for future reference...

Posted by COMTE | July 23, 2008 11:55 AM
5

The Olympic trademark gestapo are the ultimate party poopers - they pulled this same shit with the long-running Oyster Olympics event held as a fundraiser for the Puget Soundkeepers Alliance, a local non-profit that works to clean (and keep clean) the waters of Puget Sound.

Posted by Explorer | July 23, 2008 11:59 AM
6

That reply from Brendan McDonald brought tears of laughter to my eyes. Completely hilarious.

Posted by rb | July 23, 2008 12:02 PM
7

I thought it was, um common knowledge, that the word OLYMPICS was trademarked. That is why my school had the Science Olympiad and not Science OLYMPICS.


Posted by CommonKnowledge | July 23, 2008 12:06 PM
8

Isn't being a bear about being fat, too?

Posted by Non | July 23, 2008 12:11 PM
9

Brendan McDonald's response is priceless. Absolutely pitch perfect from beginning to end. He should win some sort of prize for that. Fucking hilarious.

Posted by Reverse Polarity | July 23, 2008 12:34 PM
10

Couldn't they still us the Olympic terminology because of this part of the letter: "Most of the references that you illustrated qualify for a geographic exemption under the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act, and are therefore entitled to use Olympic terminology." They can just say that they are using the word Olympic b/c of the geographic area it is taking place in. Nevertheless, hilarious post!

Posted by Scottie Yahtzee | July 23, 2008 12:54 PM
11

How'd they find you out? Google Alerts, no doubt.

Posted by John | July 23, 2008 1:00 PM
12

Dear Brendan McDonald:

The Procter & Gamble Company (hereinafter referred to as "P&G") recently became aware that the NorthWest Bears Club (“NWBC”) is promoting an event from August 7-11th in at the Miller River Campground in the CASCADE Mountains.

P&G manufactures consumer products and sells them throughout the United States. These products include CASCADE dishwashing detergent, and many other food, laundry, cleaning and personal care products.

NWBC’s use of the mark CASCADE therefore may give rise to claims of trademark infringement, unfair competition, and false advertising. In addition, NWBC’s use of the mark CASCADE dilutes the fame of P&G's trademarks, weakening their value.

P&G is requesting that the NWBC change the terminology and imagery associated with this event. Accordingly, P&G requests that NWBC take the necessary steps to remove all usages pertaining to the event, and ensure that CASCADE terminology and imagery will not be used for any future NWBC function.

Posted by Quixtar et al | July 23, 2008 1:56 PM
13

Har! Thank you for that, Quixtar.

Posted by David Schmader | July 23, 2008 2:04 PM
14

Awesome, particularly your addition, Quixtar. I actually "LOL"ed as the kids say.

Posted by leek | July 23, 2008 2:17 PM
15

I want to see someone in Olympia send a cease-and-desist letter to the USOC.

Posted by Greg | July 23, 2008 2:21 PM
16

The word Olympics is an ancient word. I don't think the current legislation would withstand a First Amendment legal challenge on the grounds of the legislation is trying to trademark a generic word. It is like trying to trademark all uses of the word "golf" or "sports".

Posted by Daniel | July 23, 2008 3:00 PM
17

@8 Have you actually met any bears, Non?

Posted by Etherite | July 23, 2008 5:09 PM
18

Non -

The definition of Bear refers to facial and body hair.. There are fat bears and not so fat bears... some people in the bear community refer to thin hairy guys as otters... but I don't consider a fat man with no body hair to be a bear...some call them 'chubs'

But since people will define themselves, it doesn't matter what I or anybody else thinks..

Posted by tickl10019 | July 23, 2008 8:06 PM
19

@Non:

"Bears" are gay men. Some are skinny, some are muscular, and some are fat. The common denominator is almost always the hairiness of the individual.

Bears generally are found on the larger side of the size continuum as a differential from the small/petite/skinny gay men found in mainstream gay culture.

Posted by Spike | July 23, 2008 8:11 PM
20

I am offended that large corporations can reserve the right to words like Olympic, Olympiad, and Apple which have been in the English language for centuries - not only that but they bully the little guy.
Theft of language is still theft in my opinion.
Boycott these types of businesses!

Posted by M Hamilton | July 23, 2008 11:26 PM
21

Ms Gross is what we call, here in Canada, a cunt.


Posted by Jamie | July 24, 2008 6:55 AM
22

Usually the USOC "finds people out" by someone (usually a sponsor) turning in a newspaper article or an event advertisement. If you look around the internet, you can see that the USOC is pretty consistent about going after *everyone* who infringes their marks.

Plus, it's a FEDERAL LAW that grants the USOC the right to those marks:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode36/usc_sec_36_00220506----000-.html

If you have a problem with it, don't bitch on a message board; write a congressman.

Posted by Douglas | July 24, 2008 7:18 AM
23

You Jamie - are an ignorant Canadian

Posted by Truemtn | July 24, 2008 1:00 PM
24

#11...Colorado Springs...James Dobson...Focus on the Family...

...nothing like an overzealous paralegal drowning in a thimble of power...

The legal statute cited by Ms. Gross actually gives a much broader allowance for use of the term "Olympic(s)" in the State of Washington than she implies. The term may be used by residents, organizations and businesses in Western Washington so long as its use is in clear reference to the geographic region.

Please note that you'll probably still get a nasty, little cease and desist notice from Ms. Gross...she does so like writing them...but even she knows that the law is clear in this exception...

Here's the actual statute that defines the trademark rights and exceptions:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode36/usc_sec_36_00220506----000-.html

TITLE 36 > Subtitle II > Part B > CHAPTER 2205 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 220506

§ 220506. Exclusive right to name, seals, emblems, and badges

(a) Exclusive Right of Corporation.— Except as provided in subsection (d) of this section, the corporation has the exclusive right to use—
(1) the name “United States Olympic Committee”;
(2) the symbol of the International Olympic Committee, consisting of 5 interlocking rings, the symbol of the International Paralympic Committee, consisting of 3 TaiGeuks, or the symbol of the Pan-American Sports Organization, consisting of a torch surrounded by concentric rings;
(3) the emblem of the corporation, consisting of an escutcheon having a blue chief and vertically extending red and white bars on the base with 5 interlocking rings displayed on the chief; and
(4) the words “Olympic”, “Olympiad”, “Citius Altius Fortius”, “Paralympic”, “Paralympiad”, “Pan-American”, “America Espirito Sport Fraternite”, or any combination of those words.

(b) Contributors and Suppliers.— The corporation may authorize contributors and suppliers of goods or services to use the trade name of the corporation or any trademark, symbol, insignia, or emblem of the International Olympic Committee, International Paralympic Committee, the Pan-American Sports Organization, or of the corporation to advertise that the contributions, goods, or services were donated or supplied to, or approved, selected, or used by, the corporation, the United States Olympic team, the Paralympic team, the Pan-American team, or team members.

(c) Civil Action for Unauthorized Use.— Except as provided in subsection (d) of this section, the corporation may file a civil action against a person for the remedies provided in the Act of July 5, 1946 (15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.) (popularly known as the Trademark Act of 1946) if the person, without the consent of the corporation, uses for the purpose of trade, to induce the sale of any goods or services, or to promote any theatrical exhibition, athletic performance, or competition—
(1) the symbol described in subsection (a)(2) of this section;
(2) the emblem described in subsection (a)(3) of this section;
(3) the words described in subsection (a)(4) of this section, or any combination or simulation of those words tending to cause confusion or mistake, to deceive, or to falsely suggest a connection with the corporation or any Olympic, Paralympic, or Pan-American Games activity; or
(4) any trademark, trade name, sign, symbol, or insignia falsely representing association with, or authorization by, the International Olympic Committee, the International Paralympic Committee, the Pan-American Sports Organization, or the corporation.

(d) Pre-Existing and Geographic Reference Rights.—
(1) A person who actually used the emblem described in subsection (a)(3) of this section, or the words or any combination of the words described in subsection (a)(4) of this section, for any lawful purpose before September 21, 1950, is not prohibited by this section from continuing the lawful use for the same purpose and for the same goods or services.
(2) A person who actually used, or whose assignor actually used, the words or any combination of the words described in subsection (a)(4) of this section, or a trademark, trade name, sign, symbol, or insignia described in subsection (c)(4) of this section, for any lawful purpose before September 21, 1950, is not prohibited by this section from continuing the lawful use for the same purpose and for the same goods or services.
(3) Use of the word “Olympic” to identify a business or goods or services is permitted by this section where—
(A) such use is not combined with any of the intellectual properties referenced in subsections [1] (a) or (c) of this section;
(B) it is evident from the circumstances that such use of the word “Olympic” refers to the naturally occurring mountains or geographical region of the same name that were named prior to February 6, 1998, and not to the corporation or any Olympic activity; and
(C) such business, goods, or services are operated, sold, and marketed in the State of Washington west of the Cascade Mountain range and operations, sales, and marketing outside of this area are not substantial.

(3) Use of the word “Olympic” to identify a business or goods or services is permitted by this section where—
(A) such use is not combined with any of the intellectual properties referenced in subsections [1] (a) or (c) of this section;
(B) it is evident from the circumstances that such use of the word “Olympic” refers to the naturally occurring mountains or geographical region of the same name that were named prior to February 6, 1998, and not to the corporation or any Olympic activity; and
(C) such business, goods, or services are operated, sold, and marketed in the State of Washington west of the Cascade Mountain range and operations, sales, and marketing outside of this area are not substantial.

Posted by yawp | July 27, 2008 6:05 AM

Comments Closed

Comments are closed on this post.