At least she has somewhat of a sense of humor.

This should be the SLOG POST OF THE DAY.

A lesson to be filed for future reference...

The Procter & Gamble Company (hereinafter referred to as "P&G") recently became aware that the NorthWest Bears Club (“NWBC”) is promoting an event from August 7-11th in at the Miller River Campground in the CASCADE Mountains.

P&G manufactures consumer products and sells them throughout the United States. These products include CASCADE dishwashing detergent, and many other food, laundry, cleaning and personal care products.

NWBC’s use of the mark CASCADE therefore may give rise to claims of trademark infringement, unfair competition, and false advertising. In addition, NWBC’s use of the mark CASCADE dilutes the fame of P&G's trademarks, weakening their value.

P&G is requesting that the NWBC change the terminology and imagery associated with this event. Accordingly, P&G requests that NWBC take the necessary steps to remove all usages pertaining to the event, and ensure that CASCADE terminology and imagery will not be used for any future NWBC function.

The definition of Bear refers to facial and body hair.. There are fat bears and not so fat bears... some people in the bear community refer to thin hairy guys as otters... but I don't consider a fat man with no body hair to be a bear...some call them 'chubs'

But since people will define themselves, it doesn't matter what I or anybody else thinks..

"Bears" are gay men. Some are skinny, some are muscular, and some are fat. The common denominator is almost always the hairiness of the individual.

Bears generally are found on the larger side of the size continuum as a differential from the small/petite/skinny gay men found in mainstream gay culture.

Plus, it's a FEDERAL LAW that grants the USOC the right to those marks:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode36/usc_sec_36_00220506----000-.html

If you have a problem with it, don't bitch on a message board; write a congressman.

...nothing like an overzealous paralegal drowning in a thimble of power...

The legal statute cited by Ms. Gross actually gives a much broader allowance for use of the term "Olympic(s)" in the State of Washington than she implies. The term may be used by residents, organizations and businesses in Western Washington so long as its use is in clear reference to the geographic region.

Please note that you'll probably still get a nasty, little cease and desist notice from Ms. Gross...she does so like writing them...but even she knows that the law is clear in this exception...

Here's the actual statute that defines the trademark rights and exceptions:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode36/usc_sec_36_00220506----000-.html

TITLE 36 > Subtitle II > Part B > CHAPTER 2205 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 220506

§ 220506. Exclusive right to name, seals, emblems, and badges

(a) Exclusive Right of Corporation.— Except as provided in subsection (d) of this section, the corporation has the exclusive right to use—
(1) the name “United States Olympic Committee”;
(2) the symbol of the International Olympic Committee, consisting of 5 interlocking rings, the symbol of the International Paralympic Committee, consisting of 3 TaiGeuks, or the symbol of the Pan-American Sports Organization, consisting of a torch surrounded by concentric rings;
(3) the emblem of the corporation, consisting of an escutcheon having a blue chief and vertically extending red and white bars on the base with 5 interlocking rings displayed on the chief; and
(4) the words “Olympic”, “Olympiad”, “Citius Altius Fortius”, “Paralympic”, “Paralympiad”, “Pan-American”, “America Espirito Sport Fraternite”, or any combination of those words.

(b) Contributors and Suppliers.— The corporation may authorize contributors and suppliers of goods or services to use the trade name of the corporation or any trademark, symbol, insignia, or emblem of the International Olympic Committee, International Paralympic Committee, the Pan-American Sports Organization, or of the corporation to advertise that the contributions, goods, or services were donated or supplied to, or approved, selected, or used by, the corporation, the United States Olympic team, the Paralympic team, the Pan-American team, or team members.

(c) Civil Action for Unauthorized Use.— Except as provided in subsection (d) of this section, the corporation may file a civil action against a person for the remedies provided in the Act of July 5, 1946 (15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.) (popularly known as the Trademark Act of 1946) if the person, without the consent of the corporation, uses for the purpose of trade, to induce the sale of any goods or services, or to promote any theatrical exhibition, athletic performance, or competition—
(1) the symbol described in subsection (a)(2) of this section;
(2) the emblem described in subsection (a)(3) of this section;
(3) the words described in subsection (a)(4) of this section, or any combination or simulation of those words tending to cause confusion or mistake, to deceive, or to falsely suggest a connection with the corporation or any Olympic, Paralympic, or Pan-American Games activity; or
(4) any trademark, trade name, sign, symbol, or insignia falsely representing association with, or authorization by, the International Olympic Committee, the International Paralympic Committee, the Pan-American Sports Organization, or the corporation.

(d) Pre-Existing and Geographic Reference Rights.—
(1) A person who actually used the emblem described in subsection (a)(3) of this section, or the words or any combination of the words described in subsection (a)(4) of this section, for any lawful purpose before September 21, 1950, is not prohibited by this section from continuing the lawful use for the same purpose and for the same goods or services.
(2) A person who actually used, or whose assignor actually used, the words or any combination of the words described in subsection (a)(4) of this section, or a trademark, trade name, sign, symbol, or insignia described in subsection (c)(4) of this section, for any lawful purpose before September 21, 1950, is not prohibited by this section from continuing the lawful use for the same purpose and for the same goods or services.
(3) Use of the word “Olympic” to identify a business or goods or services is permitted by this section where—
(A) such use is not combined with any of the intellectual properties referenced in subsections [1] (a) or (c) of this section;
(B) it is evident from the circumstances that such use of the word “Olympic” refers to the naturally occurring mountains or geographical region of the same name that were named prior to February 6, 1998, and not to the corporation or any Olympic activity; and
(C) such business, goods, or services are operated, sold, and marketed in the State of Washington west of the Cascade Mountain range and operations, sales, and marketing outside of this area are not substantial.

(3) Use of the word “Olympic” to identify a business or goods or services is permitted by this section where—
(A) such use is not combined with any of the intellectual properties referenced in subsections [1] (a) or (c) of this section;
(B) it is evident from the circumstances that such use of the word “Olympic” refers to the naturally occurring mountains or geographical region of the same name that were named prior to February 6, 1998, and not to the corporation or any Olympic activity; and
(C) such business, goods, or services are operated, sold, and marketed in the State of Washington west of the Cascade Mountain range and operations, sales, and marketing outside of this area are not substantial.