<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on The Obama Op-Ed</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_obama_oped</link>
<description>There is, of course, a ton of predictable back-and-forth between the campaigns today about Barack Obama&apos;s New York Times Op-Ed on Iraq. To me, it doesn&apos;t read as anything all that new—except that Obama clarifies his timeline for withdrawal from Iraq, saying it would be completed in 2010. And, naturally, there&apos;s wiggle room: In carrying out this strategy, we would inevitably need to make tactical adjustments. But if you&apos;re looking to catch up on where Obama is on Iraq, the surge, and a timeline for ending the war, his piece is definitely worth a read. Key section: The differences on...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:15:50 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:16:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a plan to this ex-Sergeant.</p>

<p>Unless you want a Hundred Years War with Iraq, Iran, and Iceland.</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_obama_oped#c1072874</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_obama_oped#c1072874</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:33:31 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by fluteprof</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was a great op-ed. Very clarifying. Obama at his best.</p>]]></description>
<author>fluteprof</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_obama_oped#c1072885</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_obama_oped#c1072885</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:40:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Westside forever</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>What I want to hear the candidates talk about is what they plan to do about Pakistan. Our supposed "ally" has become home base for the Taliban and Al Qaeda. Top echelons in the Pakistan government tacitly support our sworn enemies and are providing a safe haven. So what the plan? This may be a more important threat than Shia Iraq, who are unlikely to help the Sunni "Kmher Rouge" that make up the Taliban and Al Qaeda.</p>]]></description>
<author>Westside forever</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_obama_oped#c1072891</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_obama_oped#c1072891</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:47:33 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, nobody wants to admit we should nuke Pakistan, Wf.</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_obama_oped#c1072911</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_obama_oped#c1072911</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:57:34 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Trevor</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Great rhetoric. Only the war is over and the occupation is ongoing. Will he fully redeploy all US troops? No. What is the timetable for? Redeploying many troops. How many? Not sure. To do what? It's kinda unclear. Maybe do more counter-insurgency in Afghanistan, with clandestine invasions of Pakistan? But that's ok. This appeals to what most Americans (and people around the world) want to hear, and it will make McCain look like an idiot, which he is. </p>]]></description>
<author>Trevor</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_obama_oped#c1072928</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_obama_oped#c1072928</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:08:11 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Vince</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>As soon as we're gone the Iraqis will resort to their old ways of assasinations and dictatorship. Obama will be blamed and lose the White House. If he can win it in the first place that is.</p>]]></description>
<author>Vince</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_obama_oped#c1073056</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_obama_oped#c1073056</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:42:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by clintonsarmy</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>We won't support ball-less NO-Bama and will re-defeat him in November!!!</p>]]></description>
<author>clintonsarmy</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_obama_oped#c1073106</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_obama_oped#c1073106</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:35:16 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by PC</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@7:<br />
you seem to be a "troll" thingy.  The % of ex HRC voters who support Obama is about 4x the % of those who don't, so you ain't clintonsarmy, you r a rebel splinter group that clinton disavows.<br />
And I do too. <br />
And denounce, too. <br />
Pls. make a note of it.</p>

<p>PS: on the op ed:  meh.  Yes he's showing he's not changing his stance, yes it's a fine position, but it lacks that soaring unity type leadership that tells us what do we have to do to deal with the terror threat, it doesn't say btw we''ve gone totally batshit in an over-reaction to the terror threat, it doesn't say a lot of things, just we're going to leave and beef it up a bit in AFg.</p>

<p>Compared to his speeches, this is not so ..charismatic.  I mean it's fine and everything but it's flat.<br />
IMHO.</p>]]></description>
<author>PC</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_obama_oped#c1073283</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_obama_oped#c1073283</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:12:30 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@6 - um, since the media won't be reporting on Iraq anymore, who will know?</p>

<p>No US soldiers, no media.</p>

<p>Just ask Tibet. Or Darfur.</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_obama_oped#c1073288</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_obama_oped#c1073288</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:16:56 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>