Ohio plans to add paper backups in case its electronic machines break down again, as they did in 2004, creating long lines.

carefully worded to sound neutral. One would almost think that the "problems" that plagued voting in Ohio and other swing states were just random technical snags, affecting the final vote counts in random ways that didn't really favor one party or the other. One would be wrong.

This article sounds like the feds are preparing the cover story for widespread voter fraud. Note how the biggest problems are predicted for new voters, voters who have been mistakenly purged from the voter rolls (remember that whole scandal with the Attorney General and "voter caging?"), and voters in places that have replaced touch-screen models (the kind that infamously don't allow for recounts) with paper ballots. Hmmm. Which candidate will these problems hurt the most?

Now quit hogging all the rain in your hippie rain barrels!

That was less an interview than a cross-examination.