<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on The Future of Criticism</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism</link>
<description> Let&apos;s think about this for a moment. Mirror neurons in the brain fire when, for example, your finger caresses the tip of someone&apos;s nipple. Mirror neurons also fire in the same way if you happen to see another person&apos;s finger caressing the tip of someone&apos;s nipple. This means the inside is no different from the outside. How you experience your own body is also how you see another human experience their own body. This dazzling discovery increases the value of Spinoza&apos;s philosophy (&quot;no one knows what a body can do&quot;) and Tarde&apos;s sociology (imitation is everything, and everything is...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:44:40 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:01:43 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Negress</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>What the...?</p>

<p>Is this some trick to distract us from the super fun racism fight we're having in Jonah's post?</p>]]></description>
<author>Negress</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1074942</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1074942</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:26:33 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ziggity</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This certainly justifies the terrifying volume of pornography I consume.</p>]]></description>
<author>Ziggity</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1074947</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1074947</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:28:17 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mike</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>So, if Charles just *thinks* about posting, rather than actually posting, then it will fulfill his neurological needs AND spare us the hassle?</p>]]></description>
<author>Mike</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1074955</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1074955</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:33:31 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by MvB</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Only it's not "real as real," Charles. I must protest in the strongest terms your collapsing the whole of human experience into the limited function that the visuomotor mirror neurons perform. The fact that representation can still move us is not the same thing as saying it moves us just the same as reality.</p>]]></description>
<author>MvB</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1074958</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1074958</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:35:07 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Big Sven</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Charles- couldn't agree with this more.  This is why I hate Dan's "Every Child..." posts.  My shrink told me a long time ago that envisioning these stories is the same thing as experiencing them.  Watch my kid abused / slaughtered?  Pass.</p>]]></description>
<author>Big Sven</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1074959</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1074959</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:36:20 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by NaFun</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful photo, retarded thesis.  See @4</p>]]></description>
<author>NaFun</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1074963</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1074963</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:39:54 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by umvue</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  Gotta give Mr. Mudede credit.  Pseudoscientists and Pseudophilosophers so often resort to quantum mechanics for their obscurantism.  This is cutting edge.</p>]]></description>
<author>umvue</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1074976</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1074976</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:54:31 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Hartiepie</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>What? Representation is as real as reality? Sounds like an early Star Trek episode or two....</p>

<p>How old are you again Charles? I am reminded of correcting waaay too many freshman thesis papers with this basic concept arrived at presumably by smoking  some joints for inspiration a few hours before the paper was due.</p>

<p>Oh and the research that addresses this concept does NOT have subjects stroking nipples (surprise dear readers!)</p>]]></description>
<author>Hartiepie</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1074977</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1074977</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:55:50 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bob</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Wow, the neurons that fired in Charles's head while typing this failed to ignite a single mirror neuron in any of his readers. </p>

<p>Interesting demo, Chuck.</p>]]></description>
<author>Bob</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1074997</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1074997</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:09:57 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gnarls Mudede</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Charles,</p>

<p>I think you're <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3PbaFQBgv8" rel="nofollow">crazy</a>.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<author>Gnarls Mudede</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075007</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075007</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:15:37 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by hm</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I can never tell if Charles is joking or not..</p>]]></description>
<author>hm</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075009</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075009</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:16:14 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by violet_dagrinder</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>:snort:</p>

<p>Mudede said nipple!</p>

<p><br />
And, uh, bullshit. You're referencing some interesting neurobiology, but there are additional sensory neurons that fire with actual touch, and all of the mental richness of watching a reaction that you know you caused. . . basically, "This means the inside is no different from the outside. How you experience your own body is also how you see another human experience their own body" is a totally dumbshit thing to say because it's just so obviously false.</p>

<p><br />
What would we have to do to make you stop?</p>]]></description>
<author>violet_dagrinder</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075011</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075011</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:16:42 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by violet_dagrinder</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@11:</p>

<p>It has occurred to me that perhaps everything, absolutely everything, that he ever posts is satire. </p>

<p>Gawd, I hope so.</p>]]></description>
<author>violet_dagrinder</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075015</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075015</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:18:45 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Nice pic, but it's really a cascading chain of electrical and biochemical neural firings.</p>

<p>And the brain works on an holistic scheme, so it's even more hoopy than you think it is, Charles.</p>

<p>Unless you're McCain, in which case some of them kind of wander off to do unrelated things - or don't even get there.</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075018</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075018</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:19:49 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by charles mudede</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>this is just the starting point. mirror neurons allow us to reconsider the individual. and they also transform culture into a biological process. i will read more about them and develop a better theory of the self and cultural production. give me time.</p>]]></description>
<author>charles mudede</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075031</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075031</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:29:22 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by CP</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Ziggity @2, and Charles,</p>

<p>so, you're willing to be celibate the rest of your life, as long as you get to watch somebody else go at it?</p>]]></description>
<author>CP</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075095</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075095</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:28:32 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Grant Cogswell</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I don't know Tarde or Spinoza but it sounds like Blake and Whitman to me, and I'm down.</p>

<p>@16: Yes.</p>]]></description>
<author>Grant Cogswell</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075217</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075217</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:49:07 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Al</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@16 --</p>

<p>Hence the internet.  A vast repository of mirror neuron stimuli allowing nerds to experience sex.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<author>Al</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075296</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075296</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:45:45 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by PC</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"hey didja ever think that what if everything we see like disappears when it's out of sight?  {phhhhhhhhhhhhhh, here pass it on......}</p>

<p>yeah and how do you really know anything like, really exists, dude?<br />
{phhhhhhhhhhhh...}</p>

<p>yeah like in this one book I read?  The world was run by giant corporations and they just gave every drugs that made them think that it was all like this land of milk and honey? And you know?  Like the reality was it was all this horrible rusty nuked out asphalt wasteland and stuff? But like people didn't know because they were on these drugs and didn't even know it?  {phhhhhhhhhhhh...sssssssssssssssssss}</p>

<p>{hey gimme dat}</p>

<p>You mean like they got all the drugs they wanted, and didn't have to pay for them?</p>

<p>Yeah dude.</p>

<p>Awesome.</p>

<p>Yeah.</p>

<p>Heh heh heh hehh.</p>

<p>Hee hee hee hee."</p>

<p>titled: Dickensian Platonists discuss a Philosophy of Aesthetics, 2008 by:</p>]]></description>
<author>PC</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075299</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1075299</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:47:23 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by KBF</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><i>This means the inside is no different from the outside<br />...<br />Mirror neurons not only dissolve the line between external and internal (or at least force us to rethink that line...</i><br /><br /></p>

<p>Let's not get carried away here. Yes, mirror neurons are the biological basis for human feelings like empathy. When a human sees someone crying, spreading distribution in neurons activates other neurons that are commonly active at the same time:<br /><br /><br />
other person crying<b>(-->*)</b>you crying-->you cry when sad-->other person is sad<br /><br />
<i>* mirror neuron link</i><br /><br /></p>

<p>At the same time, mirror neurons <b><i>are not</i></b> nerve endings. They have their own synaptic links that are separately from those that fire when we actually experience tactile sensation. They are <b>linked</b> to those nerve ending neurons, but it's not (entirely) bi-directional. Watching someone bump their shin may make you wince, but it's not the same. Get over <i>The Matrix</i>, you potheads. =)</p>]]></description>
<author>KBF</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1076510</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_future_of_criticism#c1076510</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:01:43 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>