Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Still With the New Yorker Cover Responses!

1

They copied horsey.

Posted by Clarkj | July 22, 2008 11:58 AM
2

on my yes there is VERY SERIOUS CRITICISM to be made of this failed ATTEMPT at satire.

As we all know, ATTEMPTED SATIRE THAT FAILS IS DANGEROUS AND THUS TO BE CONDEMNED AS UNPURE.


ALSO IT IS NOT FUNNY.

PLEASE MAKE A NOTE OF IT.

Posted by PC | July 22, 2008 12:05 PM
3

I saw some horrible pictures drawn up in MAD Magazine showcasing Obama too, but no media frenzy over those.

Apparently people don't know how to take a joke in America any longer.

Posted by sir jorge | July 22, 2008 12:09 PM
4

It seems like it would be risky for any politician to embrace satire. Once they approve of satire that criticizes their opponents or opposing viewpoints or whatever, they'd have a hard time sounding credible when trying to denounce the satire that's targeting them. Satire is also based on the "I'm saying this because I believe the opposite" style of humor that promise-making candidates might wish to avoid associating themselves with. I feel like Obama had no choice but to denounce the New Yorker cover, while McCain had the option to denounce or stay mum.

Posted by Ziggity | July 22, 2008 12:15 PM
5

After having seen it for almost a week, I finally got my copy in the mail, and I have to say by that point I was no longer outraged.

It just felt like the usual kind of New Yorker poking fun at people cover.

Maybe it's like playing I Kissed a Girl over and over - sure, it sticks in your head, but eventually you burn out the response to the song.

Posted by Will in Seattle | July 22, 2008 12:16 PM
6

@3

Hey PC, were all those false rumors you spread "attempts at satire"?

Posted by elenchos | July 22, 2008 12:19 PM
7

You're off your rocker, elenchos.

Posted by w7ngman | July 22, 2008 12:22 PM
8

@1 - Damn, that is blatant too. The Constitution in the fireplace, the pills. And they changes they did make are subtle (Bush instead of Cheney, walker instead of wheelchair). Is VF trying to get sued?

Posted by Mahtli69 | July 22, 2008 12:25 PM
9

Why are they doing a fist bump?

Posted by w7ngman | July 22, 2008 12:36 PM
10

Politics, fashion and New York, ugh.
Are the Doron Braunshtein $200 dollar shirts saying 'Jews Against Obama' satire?

Posted by satire? | July 22, 2008 12:37 PM
11

better than the stranger cover.

Posted by um | July 22, 2008 12:41 PM
12

Hee hee hee...very funny!

Posted by Vince | July 22, 2008 1:24 PM
13

That caractiture is actually pretty kind to Cindy. Otherwise, the fist bump (it doesn't work on any level), the pills and walker (childish and mean-spirited), it's just stupid.

Posted by Dougsf | July 22, 2008 1:31 PM
14

We won't support ball-less NO-Bama and will re-defeat him in November!!!

Posted by clintonsarmy | July 22, 2008 1:37 PM
15

All the subsequent "New Yorker" covers work as satire, as they're making fun of the New Yorker, rather than the subjects. ;)

Posted by NapoleonXIV | July 22, 2008 5:32 PM
16

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Posted by clintonssarmy | July 22, 2008 5:46 PM
17

Wow Christ. Just pull BO's pants down and suck it. Again, Im voting for BO and I just occasionally peruse the stranger being an ex-seattleite but I was amazed the sycophantism (not a word) over BO at this paper. just suck it. go ahead.

Posted by Sam O'Flahert | July 22, 2008 7:24 PM

Comments Closed

Comments are closed on this post.