Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Olympics Not Magically Fixing ... | Games Catchup »

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Slow (and Sexy) News Day

posted by on July 29 at 13:21 PM

The Associated Press reports on the porn found in the men’s room of an Oregon library:

Police in Tualatin say a piece of pornography was found in a men’s bathroom at the city’s new library.

The police are also looking into a hole that had been drilled between two stalls in the bathroom.

Officials say there are no suspects yet.

Full story (which is exactly one sentence longer than the above excerpt) here.

RSS icon Comments

1

LOL- I wonder what they saw when they looked into that hole between the stalls

"Ouch! something poked me in the eye!"

Posted by high and bi | July 29, 2008 1:25 PM
2

#1 was so lame I laughed my ass off.

Posted by Mr. Poe | July 29, 2008 1:29 PM
3

Nice to have you back, Mr. Poe. How was prison?

Posted by David Schmader | July 29, 2008 1:31 PM
4

A "piece" of pornography? Anyone else think that's an odd way to describe porn?

"So how many pieces of pornography do you have, Bob?"

"Why, I have 57 pieces of pornography, Ted."

Posted by seattle mike | July 29, 2008 1:32 PM
5

This looks like a case for the Hardly Boys!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=KNwtJLnMoiw

Posted by eclexia | July 29, 2008 1:33 PM
6

Just answer the question, Mr. Poe: do you own a drill?

Posted by Fnarf | July 29, 2008 1:35 PM
7

@4 Much like flair.

Posted by UNPAID BLOGGER | July 29, 2008 1:36 PM
8

So are we talking peep hole or glory hole?

Posted by keshmeshi | July 29, 2008 1:36 PM
9

Have the gays won when a glory hole is drilled into a library bathroom stall?

Posted by Mike in MO | July 29, 2008 1:41 PM
10

The Oregon library has porn? I hate having to bring my own to the Seattle Public Library when I meet random people off craigs list for hookup in the bathroom. I do like the drill idea can you check out tools there too?

Posted by Reading rainbow | July 29, 2008 1:42 PM
11

Queer Safari is still the best.

Posted by Greg | July 29, 2008 1:55 PM
12

"No suspects yet".

Yet?!? Waiting for DNA test results? A reward poster that says, "Have you seen this dick?" Waiting for someone to call the Lost and Found desk?

Posted by Mahtli69 | July 29, 2008 2:13 PM
13

NWCN keeps saying that it was illegal porn, and that a playboy would not have been illegal. is there a leagal limit to the number of girls and/or cups?

Posted by DJSauvage | July 29, 2008 2:50 PM
14

Illegal porn is pretty darn hard to come by, no pun intended. About the only things that are illegal to depict in the US are fisting and pedophilia. I don't even think German Sheperds are legally barred from consenting adults.

Posted by Fnarf | July 29, 2008 3:07 PM
15

@14 - Fisting porn is illegal? Do a Google image search on "fisting" (turn off Safe Search first, and, uh, probably NSFW). You will find an abundance of lawbreakers.

Posted by Mahtli69 | July 29, 2008 3:25 PM
16

#14 - don't tell the liquor board - or the porn patrol of the SPD

Posted by John | July 29, 2008 3:29 PM
17

@15 - on the internet, sure, but in print or DVD, it's still a no-go. Seymour Butts was prosecuted for it as recently as 2002. It's pretty much the only porn that will be confiscated at customs if you bring it from Europe. Nobody knows why.

Posted by Fnarf | July 29, 2008 4:01 PM
18

@17: How do you know? Also, what implications does this have for that fisting book that, ah, my friend has?

Posted by Greg | July 29, 2008 4:08 PM
19

The Seymour Butts case was in the press at the time. I, uh, heard about it. Maybe Fleshbot. Your book? Don't try to bring it through customs and you'll be fine. They're not looking to bust you, just the producers. The lawsuit was in LA, believe it or not, where most US porn is produced.

No one can satisfactorily explain why you can buy a vid with a girl being fucked by a dog but not one where she puts her hand in herself.

Posted by Fnarf | July 29, 2008 7:48 PM
20

Apparently menstruation porn has some sort of obscenity onus on it. I read on Tasty Trixie's site that she wasn't allowed to charge people to show herself menstruating. So it's all free. Apparently. I just read her blog.

Posted by Sha | July 31, 2008 7:39 AM

Comments Closed

Comments are closed on this post.