Visual Art Re: Submitted for Jen’s Approval 3&4
posted by July 17 at 13:33 PM
onEvery day this week, Dan Savage has graciously sent an image of a sculpture found on his vacation in artsy Saugatuck, Michigan, for me to critique. It has been so! much! fun!
But I wanted to give myself an additional challenge over and above critiquing JPEGs of things I’ve never seen, so I decided I’d look at Wednesday’s Sculpture and Thursday’s Sculpture strictly in relation to one another, whatever they turned out to be.
I am told that this Sunning Bear was made by a person named Gert Olsen in 2002.
I am told that this Empty (Revisited) was made by a person named Shawn Phillip Morin in 2003.
As for that last one, Mr. Savage didn’t give me the breakdown of the materials, so I’m left to wonder whether the pedestal is a pedestal or a part of the sculpture. I would rather it be part of the sculpture, and people probably can’t help but remember it that way after they walk away from it, so I’m considering it fair game.
Which is good for the sculpture, because frankly, Empty does not really need to be Revisited, does it? (Here’s a great Eastern-influenced example of empty revisited from 1969, by Isamu Noguchi, sitting right out there every day in Seattle’s Volunteer Park.) It’s much more fun to think of Morin’s sculpture as an empty-headed hipster in tapered pants walking disdainfully by a bank.
OK, but then we have to return to the emptiness, yes we do. Because that bear is as full as full gets. It’s way, way too full, by the way. Also, I’m as guilty as the commenters of seeing sex on that thing. I, too, thought it was thrusting its butt in the air and turning around to see just who was coming for it. It makes me feel…not good. I declare this sculpture the most painful of all this week. But it is also the only one that’s made any kind of impression on me. You can’t call it colorless, even if it’s made in white marble. It’s a sort of accident, too—I’m sure the artist didn’t mean to make a randy bear with its ass in the air, but, well, here we are.
If you want to get all academic on yourselves, consider that the history of sculpture is conflicted when it comes to interiors versus exteriors. Henry Moore’s figures (here’s Vertebrae across from the Central Library in Seattle) are animated by a soul within them; in Donald Judd’s empty boxes, every last thing is on the surface (and in Eva Hesse’s great feminist reversal of Judd’s boxes, every last surface is visible, but hairy and internal and vaginal, an update on this.) So, I suppose, put all this in your pipe and smoke it. I’m with the bear, who accidentally implies that he wants penetration, and then blocks it with his smooth, unbroken surface and intended, asexual childishness.
Comments
Jen, sarcasm doesn't translate well on the web, FWIW.
I don't think people can tell that you, just as myself, tend to post things in a sarcastic manner ...
Ah, for want of a this is sarcasm tag ...
The bear is laying on it's back and looking forward.
Does this change your opinion of it?
I like the bear the best.
Butt in the air? No matter how much I squint, I can't see that.
Yeah, it's butt is not in the air. I guess this means Jen is clueless when it come to anal?
*its
We call that pose "Scoot down to the edge of the table, dear." Also, "Knees apart, please."
*comes
I guess this means I'm clueless when it comes to English...
The bear's butt is on the ground.
Even more than I am impressed that Graves wrung an actual critique out of that polar bear (posture misunderstanding aside), I am struck by how aptly it could also apply to how a stereotypical otaku experiences media.
Dear Jen,
Your interpretation of the bear as having its ass in the air and looking over its shoulder is totally ridiculous.
If that's the case, what is going on with its hind legs? No feet? You think its knees are its big, square butt, and it has a weird hunch-back lump? What the hell?
NOTHING along the spectrum from human to bear shape, when sticking its ass in the air hoping something will fuck it is shaped like that sculpture.
Remedial anatomy classes are clearly due Jen Graves.
Her grotesque miscomprehension of the fuckable bear proves she's only human. She may not know HOW to approach the sexuality of a bear.
I'm with 6, the first thing I thought of was sliding on down and exploring whatever treasure that asexual? bear has between it's legs.
The Eva Hesse link isn't working for me. Otherwise, nice post.
@12 for the win.
No, no, no -- I'm saying that's the first thing I saw when I looked at the bear, and then I had a hard time NOT thinking about it. It took my eyes a second to switch, but once they did, I saw what you're seeing, a prone bear on its back. But that first glimpse is the one I prefer. See if you can get your eyes to flip it.
Does this help?
I see what you're seeing Jen. It took me a while to figure it out, but the knees become the butt, and the bear is doing some serious yoga.
Comments Closed
Comments are closed on this post.