<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Obama&apos;s Response to the New Yorker Cover, as Told to Larry King</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover</link>
<description>It&apos;s a gracious, unpretentious, imaginative response: Well, I know it was The New Yorker&apos;s attempt at satire. I don&apos;t think they were entirely successful with it. But you know what? It&apos;s a cartoon, Larry, and that&apos;s why we&apos;ve got the First Amendment ... You know, we&apos;ve--one of the things when you&apos;re running for president for almost two years is, you get a pretty thick skin. And, you know, I&apos;ve seen and heard worse. And then all the requisite details about being a Christian, etc., etc., and then this, beautifully done: One last point I want to--I do want to make...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:23:54 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:14:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Whatevs</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Finally. Obama comes out as the pro-Muslim terrorist he is. <br />
I respect him for that. His pro-Muslim stance scares me, but his honesty is refreshing.<br />
His Muslim is cool Muslim.<br />
He's bringin' Muslim back.</p>]]></description>
<author>Whatevs</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074235</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074235</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:33:23 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris in Tampa</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>It's like he's hearing some of the criticism being directed at him, and adjusting his defenses accordingly. Who even does that anymore?</p>]]></description>
<author>Chris in Tampa</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074248</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074248</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:27:43 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by CBear</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>You know, I think Obama's response was, you know, well thought out and effective.  Except that, you know, he sure does use, "you know" alot.</p>

<p>Maybe there is a comedic flaw the late night talk show hosts can explore, since they can't find many other politically correct weaknesses to attack.</p>]]></description>
<author>CBear</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074263</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074263</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:09:11 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gabe</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>But, you know....and so does he. We all know, you know? Ummm....Obama uses his stuttering and speech hesitation to ....you know, throw off those who say he's just a slick, ummm, talker with no substance. You know, when he gets warmed up, it goes, ummmm, away.</p>

<p>And them he makes his point.</p>]]></description>
<author>Gabe</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074264</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074264</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:35:46 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gabe</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>*then</p>]]></description>
<author>Gabe</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074265</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074265</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:36:38 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mike in MO</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><em>it’s not what America’s all about</em></p>

<p>I wish all the "patriots" out there would figure this out.</p>]]></description>
<author>Mike in MO</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074266</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074266</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:51:11 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Big Sven</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>It would be fun to have a president who's not an idiot.  Yessiree, that would be a refreshing change.</p>

<p>But of course, the Republicants will say that any evolution of opinion is "flip flop."  Man, we need to deliver these assholes a humiliating defeat in the fall.  A historic, Reagan-vs-Mondale style defeat.</p>]]></description>
<author>Big Sven</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074269</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074269</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:54:19 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jason</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>#6:  So true.  When did evolution of opinion become "flip-flopping"?  The 80's? 1992? Is Reagan a flip-flopper because he used to be a Democrat? Is Robert Byrd a flip-flopper because he repudiated the KKK? Was deKlerk a flip-flopper when he worked with Mandela to dismantle Apartheid?</p>]]></description>
<author>Jason</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074277</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074277</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:26:56 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Christopher Frizzelle&apos;s Enormous Whozeewhatsit</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'll tell you what America's all about...an enormous whozeewhatsit!!!</p>]]></description>
<author>Christopher Frizzelle&apos;s Enormous Whozeewhatsit</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074278</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074278</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:39:01 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by SDizzle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"And sometimes I’ve been derelict in pointing that out."</p>

<p>I'll say!</p>]]></description>
<author>SDizzle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074279</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074279</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:53:17 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Odrama</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Too bad Odrama didn't care about the Fourth Amendment. </p>]]></description>
<author>Odrama</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074281</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074281</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:26:22 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by clintonsarmy</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>We won't support ball-less NO-Bama and will re-defeat him in November!!!!</p>]]></description>
<author>clintonsarmy</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074282</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074282</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:27:53 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Andy Niable</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Ask Eli if I can finally march in Gay Pride Parades for Obama. Or do I have to call it "satire"?</p>]]></description>
<author>Andy Niable</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074293</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074293</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:42:58 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Greg</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>What is with the spammers recently? It seems like there's even one sock-puppeting for STM every time Paul posts something.</p>]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074297</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074297</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:54:03 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DOUG.</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>What about the Black Panthers? It's offensive to them too.</p>]]></description>
<author>DOUG.</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074301</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074301</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:05:28 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by dbell</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@4: gabe, you've truly convinced me.  In the same way that fundie christians get to call genocide 'part of god's plan,' I now see that even when Obama is human and has weaknesses like the rest of us, what he's really doing is hiding his godliness to throw us off.</p>

<p>@5: Ha!</p>]]></description>
<author>dbell</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074319</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074319</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:15:28 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ***</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The people being satirized are the people who see the Obamas in this way, and most likely wouldn't read (or buy) the New Yorker anyway.  </p>]]></description>
<author>***</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074325</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074325</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:23:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by josh</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>long overdue.</p>

<p>(sounds like he took john stewart's advice [<a href="http://joshc.livejournal.com/716552.html" rel="nofollow">#</a>] for quote #1)</p>]]></description>
<author>josh</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074389</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074389</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:25:50 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Stephen Wood</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This has been a fiasco for the Obama campaign from the first moment, and nothing that he's saying is making it better.  In his first response, he played to the Philistines by expressing textbook indignation.  When the manifest political opportunism of this became embarrassing even for him (and, more importantly, for supporters who'd hoped he wouldn't dumb down his campaign), he tried to feign umbrage by by proxy, on behalf of an out-group.  What could be more incontestably righteous than that?  Problem is, the out-group not only wasn't complaining but is, like the rest of us, probably smart enough to get the fucking joke.</p>

<p>He should drop this subject as quickly as he can.</p>]]></description>
<author>Stephen Wood</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074391</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074391</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:29:13 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by josh</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>also, a lot nicer than their previous "... tasteless and offensive" response. too bad it had to appear on larry king's inane talk show instead of somewhere else.</p>]]></description>
<author>josh</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074395</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074395</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:32:10 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I think his response was well thought out and reasonable.</p>

<p>The problem is, people are reacting based on fear and lies, so being reasonable won't work.</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074433</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074433</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:09:20 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by lark</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Chris,<br />
That was one of the most inarticulate things Sen. Obama has ever said. The response was totally inadequate. The forum (The Larry King Show), too vacuous and there were too many "you knows". He should let the matter of the New Yorker cover drop. </p>]]></description>
<author>lark</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074486</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074486</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:08:17 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gabe</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@16 it was meant as a Probama comment, but I was severely hung over. He does warm up a bit though, eh? Shows his humanity and then speaks his mind. </p>]]></description>
<author>Gabe</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074757</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1074757</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:35:09 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by thevegasstyleguy</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I think the cover is brilliant. It totally makes fun of the "dittoheads" out there.</p>

<p>Why is that EVERYTHING with this man is considered offensive? I'm getting sick of him and I'm a democrat.</p>]]></description>
<author>thevegasstyleguy</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1075067</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1075067</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:29:19 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by raisedbywolves</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I am so happy he said that. Haven't we all been waiting for Obama to address the issue of how fucking horrible it is to use "He's Muslim!" as a smear campaign?</p>]]></description>
<author>raisedbywolves</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1075223</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1075223</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 02:19:25 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Vinny Indovina</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Frizzelle. Regarding that first sound bite.</p>

<p>First sentence: Score! Obama acknowledges it was meant to be satire, effectively demonstrating that he is more generous, forgiving and broad minded ( and has a better understanding of  humor) than many.</p>

<p>Second sentence: Score! Obama's critique of the NY's attempt at satire is spot on. The cover plainly failed to demonstrate WHO was having this fantasy (read a dictionary people!!).</p>

<p>Third sentence: Score! Obama gives it up for freedom of expression. Stand down all you shrillians out there who think the guy wants to take away your box of crayons.</p>

<p>Last sentence: Score! He shrugs it off.</p>

<p>Personally,  I lay the blame on the editor for not demanding a resubmission. Had he/she demanded that the illustrator visibly put this image in the mind of any one of the usual suspects then all this mess could have been avoided. Not very clever, unless they just wanted to stir up some sh;t and boost circulation.</p>

<p>Gimme the job already.</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]></description>
<author>Vinny Indovina</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1078058</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/obamas_response_to_the_new_yorker_cover#c1078058</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:14:49 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>