In defense of Charles MUDEDE where is my Y? spycharts.....

There are lots of things I would like to say to Charles... and one of those things is we have never met at The Stranger.

In my opinion that makes this one of the terrible deadliest mysteries I have yet un-written...

and well, frankly it's not that big of deal to type in and spend alot of time today filling in the defense of the dark arts club stranger flicker stickers for my
( read could possibly be part ours "IF..."),

I here Charles, or should I say I have read recently Charles has been screening or playing or well frankly maybe ascreen plaining.

This, is as Martha says... "a good thing".

Quack!!!

So here it goes my big fat mouth,
(*53982300700)

IS GOING TO LAY ON THE LINE A PROPOSAL FOR DAN SAVAGE AND Jen Graves, through charles flicker picker, now.

Hi Mike Nipper!!!!

This is a "SPECIAL" coming to you so wrap it up and i'll take you on a dream, you know the drill....

My proposal for getting my dream and keeping the Star gazers in The Stranger happy and ready to set up my word of Mouth fundraiser proposal for :)S.S. MOORE(:.

That's the code name for my Dream Pack with Mardi Moore of MJM and Associates

to legally
build a fundraiser team for sponsoring my Foundation

please defend this statement.

Do I have to get mean with my language or do I have to invade Bill Gates Dinner Party with His wife Again in Kirland and publically embarrass you again????

Where the Fuck is the rest of my e-mail explanation!!!!!!

Just as Charles' historical comments have no logic, facts, history or reason in mind.

It is all style. A psuedo-intellectual style. It's the old avant garde game, a game of making up statements with no meaning, or that are actually untrue, and seeing how many readers will silently bow down and go along, afraid to say it's all bullshit.

I.e., the eternal game of the petite bourgeoisie masquerading as intellectual.

But good catch on the style, Charles.

Your'e The Retard now, aren't you?

Uh. . .no?

If A (truth) is not B (human)
And
If C (building) is not B (human)
it does NOT follow that
C (building) is A (truth)

I would argue that a building not designed with humans in mind is actually, at best, sculpture. At worst, a bad building.

I don't usually look to see who the author is before I read a post, but I've learned to recognize Mudede Speak within about the first six words, and I typically skip the posts.

Problem is, I love architecture, so I find myself reading these posts. And then getting pissed off, yet again, about wasted moments of my life.