It's certainly true that Obama's position on FISA is disappointing and of real concern. However, let's see how the Senate FISA debate plays out before jumping into full fledged condemnation, let alone contemplating forgiveness.
The guy was a Constitutional scholar. There may be a strategy here that's not obvious. For instance, the "compromise" FISA bill provides telcos retroactive immunity from civil lawsuits, but it does not provide retroactive *criminal* immunity.
I am concerned and disappointed, but not quite ready to come to conclusions yet.
Call his campaign office at 866-675-2008 or e-mail them at
firstname.lastname@example.org and tell them that you want Obama to stand
by his promise to support filibuster of any bill
supporting immunity for the telecommunications companies who spied
on us. Tell them that you understand the bill on which the
Senate will soon vote will allow those traitors off the hook if
they simply prove that the President told them what they did would
be okay, and that if this is the sort of thing we can expect to
see out of the Democrats, you'll cast your vote for Ralph
Motherfucking Nader this November.
Daily Kos: "Amnesty, Obama, and the Good Fight"
"A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises at first a formidable outcry in defense of custom." - Paine, Thomas Common Sense, Anonymous, 1776
I think his thinking is it's better we lose our freedom than he be accused of being soft on terror. Disappointed? I expected no better.
Comments are closed on this post.