Slog - Comments on Re: Emmanuelle

Comment by benxer

benxer — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:38:26 -0800

hey great recipes at
www.duggarfamily.com

mmmm christian food

Comment by MvB

MvB — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:44:25 -0800

That's her reading outfit then, is it? What a terrific library.

Comment by Fnarf

Fnarf — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:45:08 -0800

Hey, cool! My comment was deleted, and replaced with spam!

Comment by Jerod

Jerod — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:45:34 -0800

Thanks, but I've already got all the fried potato product casserole recipes that I need.

Comment by Westside forever

Westside forever — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:49:37 -0800

There's no question that Megan Fox is a hot piece, but why does she always look a little greasy?

Comment by wisepunk

wisepunk — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:53:14 -0800

My guess is baby oil.

Comment by Jessica

Jessica — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:10:52 -0800

@5 and 6: The Marilyn Monroe tattoo on her forearm causes the greasy look. Because nothing says "serious actress" like a fucking Marilyn tattoo.

Comment by Greg

Greg — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:21:54 -0800

She's 22, yet she looks older than me. That is just not right.

Comment by left coast

left coast — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:23:46 -0800

If someone can get her in a movie beating a guy off and singing Happy Birthday Mr. President, Mr. Skin may f'ing explode.

Comment by Fnarf

Fnarf — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:31:57 -0800

Never mind, I've been faked out by Charles swapping photos.

Comment by Smarm

Smarm — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:22:15 -0800

Those dessert mold boobs are uber creepy. They're not real and they're not incredible.

Comment by Fnarf

Fnarf — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:56:48 -0800

I have no idea if her tits are real or not, but it's quite possible to get the dessert-mold look with careful garment fitting, or not-fitting I should say.

Those are definitely $450-an-hour eyes, though.

Comment by as a rule

as a rule — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:25:57 -0800

The camera loves her - there're some primo images of her floating around.

Comment by Bellevue Ave

Bellevue Ave — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:39:36 -0800

why isn't she doing porn?

Comment by Greg

Greg — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:44:58 -0800

Also, the lighting in this photograph is terrible.

Comment by Joe M

Joe M — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:18:26 -0800

In the same manner as "Line Out", I suggest the Stranger create a separate blog for Charles' various chick photos and pointless marxist ramblings. You could call it "CLOG", and it would enable us to access the otherwise fine content of SLOG without these distractions. I have no doubt A. Birch Steen has brought this idea up in a meeting or two.

(Charles, you do have kick-ass taste in architecture, however. Please keep those posts coming.)

Comment by Greg

Greg — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:17:17 -0800

And @13: It is possible for natural ones to be pushed up like that, but it is not possible for them to be natural and also have that desert valley between them. I call fake.