Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on The NEA Dials Its Time Machine Forward, a Nation Rejoices


The plays should have lots of "artistic" nudity.

Posted by OR Matt | June 10, 2008 11:30 AM

Yeah, like anyone will even see these fucking plays. It IS a waste of money, so I'm applying for a grant now. Don't hate the player...

Posted by Jason Josephes | June 10, 2008 11:47 AM

I would just say that, given the issues of theaters committing to develop plays they never end up producing (otherwise known as the New Play Development system or Development Hell), the $20,000 grants are a mixed bag, as they allow theaters to get grant money without having to commit to writers that they'll do their work.

A step in the right direction to be sure, but it could end up inadvertently serving institutional interests instead of artist interests, something which I (sorry to plug) actually wrote about a little here:

Thanks! I love the slog!

Posted by isaac | June 10, 2008 1:35 PM

The galling thing about this is that the NEA is forking over nearly $300,000 to "develop" a whopping total of SEVEN "new plays".

Meanwhile, small fringe theatre companies develop literally scores of new works every year - and with just about as good a track record as the majors, I would venture - but they'll not see a dime of this, because the NEA won't consider them worthy of the largesse, despite the fact that $20,000 could represent a significant investment in these organizations, whereas it will amount to little more than pocket change to institutions that typically operate on multi-million dollar budgets.

My own company, just to cite one example, will have done THREE world premieres out of a four show mainstage season this year. But, the odds of us securing one of these seven slots would be about zero, given that every major theatre company in the country is going to submit for this.

Posted by COMTE | June 10, 2008 2:16 PM


Which is also assuming that your company (Annex) can even qualify for these grants. I have no idea what your operating budget is, however, I am sure that unless you have your own 501(c)3 you do not even qualify. If indeed you do, which I think Annex does, if you do not have an operating budget of at least $50,000 you are encouraged NOT to apply! Don't even get me started on how much bullshit is involved getting a grant to tour from the NEA!

Just give the grants to the Rep. already so they can produce Craig Lucas' next piece of shit.

Posted by misspennycandy | June 10, 2008 3:11 PM

Far be it from me to complain about governmental largess wisely directed to the arts.

But--excepting artistic collectives and declared ensembles--since when did the writing of plays become a committee event? This smacks more of pouring grist down the hungry, open, maw of Institutions than it does with helping and feeding our future playwrights.

There is the story of a new playwright given a six-week workshop at a major LORT house with first cabin actors and a Tony-award winning director, to boot. The play was about two men in love with the same women. After a month and a half of "development" (from actors, dramaturges, director, minions) the play had because a story of a woman's disgruntlement with men. The LORT theatre subsequently declined to pick it up. The Arena Stage expressed an interest, the playwright sent them his initial script, sans improvements, and the D.C. Institution went with the original piece.

Posted by Laurence Ballard | June 10, 2008 11:25 PM

Comments Closed

Comments are closed on this post.