Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Statue of Martin Luther King Jr. Looks Kind of Uppity

1

Hmmm. While we're at it, can we add a few changes to Rushmore?

Posted by Andy Niable | May 9, 2008 10:57 AM
2

A 3 page article without pictures? Worthless!

Posted by Anon | May 9, 2008 10:57 AM
3

The statue is totalitarian looking. I think a more humanistic representation would be better. (I am not a trained critic or play one on tv.)

Posted by Mike | May 9, 2008 11:00 AM
4

Just get out and let Dr. King have the car. It's not worth losing your life over.

Posted by Apsaras | May 9, 2008 11:00 AM
5

I think the commission is correct. The current version looks more Kim-Jong-Il than MLK.

Posted by Karlheinz Arschbomber | May 9, 2008 11:06 AM
6

Whoa--I clicked on the picture, prepared to be outraged by this, and after seeing it, my first thought was

pudgy Lenin.

Posted by NapoleonXIV | May 9, 2008 11:06 AM
7

Why are we out sourcing publicly funded art to the Chinese??

Posted by Jeremy | May 9, 2008 11:10 AM
8

"Commissioner Jose L. Galvez III said he thought the sculpture lacked a sense of King's power."

Bullshit. That sculpture radiates power.

I like the current design, it makes me think that he's watching over all the crazy fucks in Congress and the White House.

Posted by Lesley | May 9, 2008 11:12 AM
9

It really is a butt-ugly statue.

Posted by Uppity | May 9, 2008 11:15 AM
10

this was the kind of picture they wanted, right?

http://z.about.com/d/afroamhistory/1/8/M/R/martin_luther_king_gallery8.jpg

Posted by LMSW | May 9, 2008 11:16 AM
11

I think they should make the statue bigger and put GWB's head beneath his foot.

Posted by Will in Seattle | May 9, 2008 11:24 AM
12

Their comments are poorly phrased, but they're basically right. That statue sucks.

Posted by Drew | May 9, 2008 11:29 AM
13

This is a no-win situation. I would have used an image reminiscent of him giving his speech in front of the Lincoln Memorial.

Posted by elswinger | May 9, 2008 12:01 PM
14

I think the problem a liberal like me would have with the quote is in the arts commission's sloppy choice of "confrontational," as the word to describe what's wrong with the statue. The folded arms suggest that, perhaps, but what they should have said was "as art it's laughably dated(HEROIC REALISM? For crap's sake....)and as as a political statement, it suggests an unfortunate deference to just the sort of oppression that Dr. King gave his life to fight."

Posted by Kristen | May 9, 2008 12:04 PM
15

He looks so...disappointed, and angry with us.

Posted by Hernandez | May 9, 2008 12:11 PM
16

Dr. King's statue should be confrontational. That's the whole Goddamn point. It would be a great insult to his memory to construct a statue that's comfortably banal, probably as great an insult as most public MLK day events, where we hear platitudes mouthed from podiums to assuage our collective white guilt so we can pretend for one day that we give a shit about black people.

Posted by Greg | May 9, 2008 1:57 PM
17

The thing is, I want a confrontational, intimidating statue of Dr. King staring at Capitol Hill 24/7. I think it would do a lot of good.

Posted by Greg | May 9, 2008 2:00 PM
18

I agree with Greg.

Posted by Will in Seattle | May 9, 2008 5:15 PM
19

Ahhh! Public art and politics.

Posted by -B- | May 10, 2008 10:37 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).