Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« All Your Base Out Of Are Belon... | Obama to Declare Victory... »

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Shocker!

posted by on May 8 at 11:11 AM

This Dove ad featuring “real women”…

blog%20dove%20girls.jpg

Was Photoshopped.

RSS icon Comments

1

I'm glad I was sitting down when I read this because, man... that's a shocker.

Really.

Honest.

In other news, rain is wet.

Posted by Chris B | May 8, 2008 11:14 AM
2

bears poop in the woods!

Posted by Bellevue Ave | May 8, 2008 11:15 AM
3

oh fuck, even real women aren't real. Now I have no idea what standard I'm supposed to live up to.

Posted by PopTart | May 8, 2008 11:17 AM
4

*headdesk*

Posted by Jessica | May 8, 2008 11:23 AM
5

The blonde in the middle is rather humpable.

Posted by Matthew | May 8, 2008 11:26 AM
6

#5, what blond? I don't see her.

Posted by w7ngman | May 8, 2008 11:32 AM
7

@6, hahahaha.

Posted by El Seven | May 8, 2008 11:32 AM
8

Sigh.

Posted by Will in Seattle | May 8, 2008 11:37 AM
9

Pretty soon men confronted with real tits won't even recognize them

Posted by Shilo Urban | May 8, 2008 11:48 AM
10

I used to do this for a living.

I doubt that either the Venus de Milo or of Willendorf are accurate to their models, as well.

Posted by former editor | May 8, 2008 11:50 AM
11

Oh please--even if Photoshop wasn't used, the photographer lights the scene for the best advantage, the stylist makes everybody's hair and skin look as good as possible. Shoot angles and cropping is manipulated to get the best out of the image.

Back in the day it was called COMMERCIAL ART. Which it still is even if now it's called brand marketing. And really, would you want to be bombarded with "real" images of "real" people? There's plenty of that to go around just walking down the sidwalk.

Posted by Westside forever | May 8, 2008 11:50 AM
12

I would be content to have myself and the ladies challenge Qaddafi and his elite bodyguards to a friendly softball match.

Posted by Lloyd Clydesdale | May 8, 2008 11:51 AM
13

Newsflash: every ad you've ever seen is Photoshopped. Every PICTURE you've ever seen, in a magazine, is Photoshopped.

Posted by Fnarf | May 8, 2008 11:56 AM
14

Next thing you know, Fnarf will tell us that those pictures of buildings that don't exist that we see in design reviews aren't of real buildings ...

Or that DOA is highly unrealistic.

Posted by Will in Seattle | May 8, 2008 12:01 PM
15

Real Women without zits, rashes, moles, or scars.

And @11 is on the money too. I don't think we should expect to see any advertising with the subject lit up by a cheesy fluorescent light bulb.

Posted by Mahtli69 | May 8, 2008 12:08 PM
16

The point bout "Real Women" is more about body image. I had a disagreement with my roommate the other day because he thought a women on the tele was fat (she was like a size 8). But, if you're advertising soap, you are going to be concerned about the look of the skin of your models. It's not about lying about how fat you are, but how well Dove makes your skin glow.

Posted by Mr. Joshua | May 8, 2008 12:08 PM
17

As long as they started, they should have kept photoshopping. Those fatties were still pretty grim.

Posted by A Real Guy | May 8, 2008 12:16 PM
18

I'm with #16, I think the campaign wasn't about untarnished photos in the ad as much as it was about the women having more average bodies and facial features. As far as I can read they didn't make their thighs thinner or anything.

Posted by w7ngman | May 8, 2008 12:18 PM
19

well, they are still selling soap, and choosing models with "perfect" or photoshopped skin. yeah, it's no big surprise. and yes, it is great that they are using different, more realistic body types then normally seen in similar commercials. but it still does stretch the truth a bit -- ie, you will have beautiful skin if you use our product. the angle is still the same, and perhaps even more effective because of the campaign.

Posted by infrequent | May 8, 2008 12:23 PM
20

I use Dove, and I've lost 10 pounds!

Posted by Spoogie | May 8, 2008 12:26 PM
21

put some pannuses in that group, and its realistic. there's no way photoshop can make a fat apron look humpable.

Posted by max solomon | May 8, 2008 12:54 PM
22

Okay so, there was no retouching of the general body-types of the women in the Dove ad, but gee, it's pretty lame that women presumably using a product "designed" to improve their skin need to have their skin - um, "improved".

I mean, isn't the PRODUCT supposed to be doing that? And if it's not, then, well, it's not really doing its job, is it?

Posted by COMTE | May 8, 2008 1:09 PM
23

Next up: Comte discovers the truth behind product claims.

Posted by Emily | May 8, 2008 1:18 PM
24

@20 ... um, that might have something to do with WHAT you're using it for ... could you please use a towel afterwards?

Posted by Will in Seattle | May 8, 2008 1:41 PM
25

For "real women" those sure are some skinny bitches.

Posted by Greg | May 8, 2008 1:54 PM
26

this version of the video is more fun to watch:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-kSZsvBY-A

Posted by DSB | May 8, 2008 2:00 PM
27

i worked as a photo retoucher for a few years. it's just part of the industry! and the ovverall message is more important then if they cleaned the image up a little bit. the women featured were average looking. there's no need to be so dramatic.

Posted by tiffany | May 8, 2008 3:07 PM
28

Every ad is a lie.

That's why they're ads.

Posted by Ben | May 8, 2008 3:21 PM
29

Dear god. Photoshopped? A magazine image?

Come ON, no kidding it's Photoshopped. They also don't show amateur photos in these magazines. This is professional stuff.

Posted by wench | May 8, 2008 5:41 PM
30

"There's lies, damned lies, statistics, ads and my tax return from last year."
- Disraeli, Twain, Churchill or some other dead guy.

Posted by M'thew | May 9, 2008 2:07 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).