Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Science Gets Skunked

1

Well, the obvious answer to your presumably rhetorical question must be: because UK prisons are woefully underutilized, what with there not being nearly enough murders, bank robbers, child rapists, cut-purses, highwaymen, or deer-poachers to fill them.

Fortunately, such a problem doesn't exist in THIS country, where our prisons are full-to-overflowing.

Posted by COMTE | May 8, 2008 12:41 PM
2

I think the British are deathly afraid of the Winehouse Effect and they'll be overrun by a generation of gap-toothed, rats nest behaired, one hit wondered, drug addicts.

Posted by michael strangeways | May 8, 2008 12:46 PM
3

I think one of the factors in this trend is a Boomer vs. their kids thing. I've remember hearing from a boomer woman I know say that smoking marijuana was verbooten for her kids, even though she had let her own freak flag fly back in the '60's, because today's pot is "way stronger".

Grandma's "lid" of Mexican Brown back in the day may have been weaker, but she and her friends had to smoke up a hell of a lot more of it to get as high as today's hydro. It's a specious argument to say that stronger=more dangerous. Stronger can just as easily = more efficient.

Posted by Westside forever | May 8, 2008 12:51 PM
4

I am constantly hearing that "today's pot is stronger," and I have to ask: stronger than WHAT? There was strong pot and weak pot 40 years ago, just as there is today. It would be interesting to see what qualitative measurement justifies that statement.

Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty | May 8, 2008 12:58 PM
5

before i moved away hash was much more prevalent than weed in the uk.

Posted by Jiberish | May 8, 2008 1:11 PM
6

Isn't stronger pot a lot safer than weaker pot? You don't have to smoke nearly as much.

Posted by poppy | May 8, 2008 1:14 PM
7

I do believe that pot is more potent than it used to be due to improved growing techniques. But from a public health standpoint this is a good thing. Stronger pot means bongs and pipes are more frequently used instead of joints, which means less marijuana is necessary to achieve the same effect.

Posted by PJ | May 8, 2008 1:18 PM
8

Hello? They just recently started calling it skunk? Where have the U.K.'s potheads been the last 25 years?

Posted by KeeKee | May 8, 2008 1:26 PM
9

@8 smoking hash, and skunk is cheap weed, skunk is strong weed. same language different meanings.

Posted by Jiberish | May 8, 2008 1:35 PM
10

sorry i meant it doesn't mean cheap weed...it means strong

Posted by Jiberish | May 8, 2008 1:36 PM
11

Have to agree on the comment about Boomers trying to legislate their lack of morality on their kids.

Total waste of time, quite frankly.

Posted by Will in Seattle | May 8, 2008 1:37 PM
12

Many Boomers have simply done exactly what they said they'd never do - become just like their parents.

And just like their parents, their "do as I say, not as I (did)" prohibitions will prove equally as ineffective on their own children as their parent's were on them.

Posted by COMTE | May 8, 2008 3:54 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).