Yeah, we have a common ancestor, but we never invite him to family gatherings. It's just ... well ... it would take too long to explain.
go read some platypus poetry if you haven't already.
I love science....so.....much!
"Parchment-shelled egg-laying monotremes also exhibit a more ancestral glandular mammary patch or areola without a nipple that may still possess roles in egg protection. However, in common with all mammals, the milk of monotremes has evolved beyond primitive egg protection into a true milk that is a rich secretion containing sugars, lipids and milk proteins with nutritional, anti-microbial and bioactive functions."
I need to get me a lady platypus and start licking it's glandular mammary patch, sounds like sweet ambrosia! Anti-microbial, too.
Did you keep saying "the platypus" because you don't know what the plural of platypus is?
fascinating stuff btw.
Platypuses are fantastic creatures! But very shy; when we went to Australia we went to three platypus exhibits with no luck before getting lucky at the fourth, Healesville Sanctuary: http://www.flickr.com/photos/fnarf/166207135 (photo is terrible, I know).
The chromosome thing just freaks me out.
They're not unique, though -- echidnas are monotremes, too, and almost as weird.
@5: Platypi? Platypussies? In a group, Platypod? I need to look into this. I don't think anyone knows!
Indeed, the echidnas are pretty amazing too. I remember reading their penises have four (five?) heads. Only two are used during sex, the other heads shrivel up only to be used next time, trading off.
Still, the complex electricity-based sensory system in the Platypus wins my heart. That just such a *fish* thing.
And yes, I have no clue as to the proper plural for the Platypus. An hour when I wished Slog was copyedited regularly.
Jonathan, you are delightful!
@5 and @8:
I love a good unresolvable conundrum...it's neither, it's both.
I'm sticking with Platypi since it's from Latin and that would be correct there. Perhaps Platypae for more than one female Platypus, Platypum for transgendered Platypi.
Hah, I got it!
Score one for the Greeks...and the Geeks who spend time looking this shit up.
Stupid question: how does the platypus lactate if it doesn't have nipples?
This is too cool! Milk producing glands are just mutated sweat glands!
So, think of it like this:
scales -> skin + hair -> sweat glands to keep the skin cool -> a patch of skin's sweat glands mutate to make something that keeps eggs happy -> this secretion becomes nutritious = milk from a patch of skin! -> the center of this special patch of skin raises up to make it easier to feed from -> The Nipple!
Platypodes are somewhere on the "secretion becomes nutritious" step. I, for one, am pro-nipple. Listing to anyone who has survived giving birth to a human child, I must admit that marsupials have a better strategy for birthing live young.
@12: This is the first thing I got onto after reading the OP. I thought, "without a nipple, there still must be mammary glands, or proto-mammary glands, does it just secrete through the skin? I'll bet there are sense areas around these "areolas" that respond to a youngun rubbing against it.
Basically, as Johnatan gas stated, this is the evolution of the nipple encapsulated.
Now your Amazons...
@ 14: yeah, has, not gas:)
Just a teensy correction: Not all of the vertebrate land animals are amniotes. The big exception is amphibians. Amniote eggs have extra membranes that protect the eggs and prevent the egg from drying out. Even placental mammals (us) have amniotic membranes -- hence the common gush of fluids when mom-to-be's membranes break. Frogs, newts, etc. don't have those membranes, and hence split away from our lineage way before platypuses, birds and reptiles did. So hey -- how about comparing platypus DNA to frog DNA?
@16: Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't the Amphibians the link fron sea to land (other than the Coelacanth)? Wouldn't the Platypoda be more of a throwback or side job than a link?
@13: except for that pouch thing. And the tiny, tiny brains they have (marsupials have the smallest brains for their body weight of anything, I think).
JG, I understand your frustration with gov't funded studies published in for-profit venues. But I hope you are aware that at least NIH is addressing this problem (and in a way that is remarkably forward-thinking given that we are STILL dealing with the Bush Admin.):
If you didn't know, read the guidance, and check in with your Sponsored Projects office. They are a font of useful information. (Can you tell what I do for a living?)
You're right in that amphibians are the best "link" we have to our marine vertebrate ancestry. Amphibians were the first land vertebrates (tetrapods). They evolved from the same group of fishes (now mostly extinct) that includes the coelecanth. The first reptiles evolved from a long-extinct group of amphibians and (as Dr. Golob stated), birds and mammals evolved from long-extinct groups of reptiles. So, for vertebrates, amphibians were the first to (partially) abandon their sea legs.
And I agree that the platypus is more likely to be an oddity or side job, rather than some throw back to amphibian lifestyle. Most monotremes that have ever existed went extinct long ago. The survivors are few and far between, and may not be the most accurate representations of the typical monotreme lifestyle. What if all placental mammals suddenly went extinct except for humans and the armadillo? The two of us alone would barely be an accurate representation of our group. :-)
So, I'm more intrigued to compare the platypus genome to several different reptiles, since all mammals arose from mammal-like reptiles. Unfortunately, I don't think many (any?) reptile genomes have yet been sequenced. Though I think a lizard and a crocodilian are in the pipeline.
Marsupial evolution is interesting to me because in many ways it mirrors mammalian evolution in the ways it exploits it's enviorments. My own belief is that given the right conditions life will repeat many of the body types and uses to adapt. (i.e. birds vs. bats, tiger vs. marsupial tiger, now extinct, etc.)
I love Science 'cause he's so delicious.
Does anybody remember those informational animal cards that used to be advertised on TV in the 80s? I think you got a box of them or something like that... That is the first time I ever heard of the platypus and I was totally hooked. They are phenomenal.
I saw some at an aquarium a few years ago and they are much smaller than I thought they would be. But, I still couldn't taking my eyes off of them -- so crazy-looking.
If you're ever lucky enough to see 'em in the wild (I haven't been, but hope to someday), be careful; they have huge, razor-sharp spurs on their back legs that can cut you up, and poison you. Maybe that's why they aren't invited over to RonK's house anymore.
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).