Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on It's the Delegate Count, Stupid

1

Yay!

Posted by Grant Cogswell | May 6, 2008 11:13 PM
2

good lord that's confusing. you'd think that there would be some reforms, but there sure as hell weren't any in the pres election after 2000 and 2004.

Posted by konstantconsumer | May 6, 2008 11:24 PM
3

Add the supers that are his and I think he's got enough for a first-ballot nomination. I think Hillary's looking at the same numbers, and she's going to say something tomorrow morning.

Posted by Fnarf | May 7, 2008 1:22 AM
4

God, with that random nonsense post, you dare to call your readers stupid?

Buy a fucking clue.

Posted by Ben | May 7, 2008 2:06 AM
5

It's an allusion, stupid.

Posted by Chris in Tampa | May 7, 2008 3:23 AM
6

At the rate she's going, she could catch up if there were 100 more states like Indiana--and none like North Carolina. It's going to be a bumpy ride, and this isn't over until she lets go of the wheel. She may not believe in the caucus and primary delegates, she may not believe in the popular vote, she may not believe in the rules of the game, but she sure believes in herself.

Posted by rod | May 7, 2008 6:28 AM
7

@4

Ben, your clue for this morning is "go away."

Posted by elenchos | May 7, 2008 8:12 AM
8

You put all that time into blockquotes and paragraphs and graphics and you only got 7 (now 8) comments.

haaaa haaa

Posted by Non | May 7, 2008 4:15 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).