I always thought being under the influence was technically citable?
There is a reason it is called "drunk and disorderly" the status of being intoxicated has to be accompanied by an offensive action. It isn't constitutional to criminalize a status, possession can be criminal however.
Ahhhh, makes sense.
What about DWB?
Let's just stop handcuffing police!
Isn't being obviously high reason to believe you have drugs on your person hence probable cause for a search?
doesn't the DSHS office make 2nd avenue even sketchier than a dark alley?
Whew, what a relief! For a while there I was worried the police might do something about the junkies and muggers on on Second.
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).