Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Re: Clinton and Her "White Ame... | Clinton/Thurmond 2012 »

Thursday, May 8, 2008

For Your Consideration

posted by on May 8 at 9:49 AM

Two people—just two—talking on cell phones get hit by trains… and both our daily papers spot one of those disturbing trends that daily papers can’t resist pointing out:

It’s dangerous to talk on a cellphone when you’re anywhere near railroad tracks.

That sounds obvious, but railroad officials say it bears repeating after a man was struck and killed by a train Wednesday while talking on a cellphone, the second such accident in the region in the past 2-˝ weeks.

A man talking on a cell phone while walking Wednesday on railroad tracks was hit by a train and killed. He was the second person in the area to be killed by a train while talking on a cell phone in the past two weeks.

Presented for your consideration, daily paper editors: Youth Pastor Watch.

RSS icon Comments

1

You know, trains are pretty predictable. They don't screw around. Highly focused -- driven, you might say. They run ON railroad tracks, not "anywhere near" them.

Posted by Fnarf | May 8, 2008 9:56 AM
2

@1
Awesome

Posted by Clearlyhere | May 8, 2008 10:02 AM
3

They always make a big deal out of these train vs human things, both because they are so preventible, and because they mess so much stuff up: Freight and passenger schedules, auto traffic in the area of the wreck, etc.

What's weird to me is the length of time it takes a coroner to come out, look at the body, and say "yup. He's dead all right. And that trains the one that did it." Somtimes it takes six or seven hours.

Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay | May 8, 2008 10:03 AM
4

Jeez Dan, 5 posts before 10am? You are shot out of a cannon today. Perhaps you are excited for slog trivia this evening?

Posted by wisepunk | May 8, 2008 10:06 AM
5

#1, talking on a cell phone "anywhere near" the tracks clearly leads to aimlessly wandering onto them.

Posted by w7ngman | May 8, 2008 10:06 AM
6

@1, but if trains could run OFF their rails; then life would be much much fuller for all of us!

Posted by Cato the Younger Younger | May 8, 2008 10:09 AM
7

It seems like you'd have to work hard to be hit by a train in 2008 -- it seems so anachronistic, like being run down by a zeppelin...

Posted by Peter F | May 8, 2008 10:13 AM
8

Natural selection illustrated

Posted by Mahtli69 | May 8, 2008 10:16 AM
9

In defense of the dailies, they aren't overlooking the real, albeit rogue-wavish, possibility of a Crazy Train.

Posted by Lloyd Clydesdale | May 8, 2008 10:23 AM
10

One would think the road, with its much more randomly traveling vehicles, would pose the greater risk.

Posted by Giffy | May 8, 2008 10:26 AM
11

Why do they say "killed by a train"? Shouldn't it say, "killed by not paying attention"? Is there some kind of rule in journalism that mandates this kind of blame game?

I can almost understand the first one getting killed as she was just crossing. But the recent one, yikes.

Posted by El Seven | May 8, 2008 10:27 AM
12

@9 - All Aboard!

Aye aye aye aye ...

Posted by Ozzy! | May 8, 2008 10:31 AM
13

I think the cell phone part isn't the issue, walking on tracks is the issue. It's something easy to blame but really seems unrelated these people could have just as easily been listening to their Ipods or reading US weekly or chewing gum. It simply adds some shock/scare value and reminds people to never talk on a cell phone. it's just like the headline of a teen who was raped or killed reading "Murdered teen was an active Myspace.com user"

Posted by Little Red Ryan Hood | May 8, 2008 11:03 AM
14

Can ya here me now? Technology racks up another one. Last year it was a car load of teens with the driver so busy texting that she didn't see the semi coming the other way. Now 2 people yakking on cell phones in front of speeding trains. If it could only be the idiot next to me at the movies, who spent half the movie texting. Your time will come texting boy! Your time will come. Bwaahhahaha!

Posted by Sad Comment | May 8, 2008 11:03 AM
15

Fnarf, you are on fire this week.

Posted by Jen | May 8, 2008 11:17 AM
16

On July 1, 2008, it will be illegal to talk on your cell phone while driving.

Heads up - you've been warned.

Posted by Will in Seattle | May 8, 2008 11:44 AM
17

Fun game:

Notice how when there is a motorcycle death, the headline usually says "Cyclist dies" or "Rider died after accident". While if it is a car or a train or a plane it is "Driver killed" or "Pedestrian killed by train".

To be killed is to die violently, unnaturally. Something that isn't expected or supposed to happen. When you simply die, it's like "die of natural causes" or "die of old age" (you never say "killed by old age").

The papers have decided that motorcyclist deaths are an ordinary, expected thing, as unsurprising as the falling of the rain. Cell phone talkers are "killed" though. Go figure.

Posted by elenchos | May 8, 2008 1:03 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).