2008 Edwards to Endorse Obama Today
posted by May 14 at 14:15 PM
onVia HuffingtonPost:
The Obama campaign has announced a “major national endorsement” for a rally tonight at 7pm in Michigan, and the rumor mill is swirling that it is none other than Sen. John Edwards.
That’s 4 p.m. Pacific time. Check back in to see what happens, but this would indeed be a good day for Obama, facing continuing questions about his ability to attract working class whites, to get the backing of a good ol’ boy like Edwards.
UPDATE: The New York Times confirms: Edwards will endorse Obama.
ALSO: NARAL Pro-Choice America endorsed Obama earlier today.
Comments
Breaking News Alert
The New York Times
Wednesday, May 14, 2008 -- 5:17 PM ET
-----
John Edwards to Endorse Barack Obama
John Edwards will endorse Senator Barack Obama for the
Democratic presidential nomination, a spokeswoman for the
Obama campaign said.
I'm hearing it from all over. And it's going to happen here in Militiagan! Or Michissippi. I forget what I'm calling it these days.
Must've bought him a jet-ski.
Woot!
Well who else was there for him to endorse? Ron Paul? Mike Gravel?
A jet-ski and the promise of a Supreme Court nomination, no doubt.
John Edwards for Vice President?
Now that the nomination is effectively settled, Edwards is ready to endorse the candidate who's already won?
It's good news, no argument, but I fear the attention it's getting will further encourage Edwards' pandering ways.
Here's another thing Edwards potentially brings to Obama, delegates. According to Dave Weigel at Reason.
Something that really drives a stake into Hillary: Edwards has delegates. He has a mere 19 left over from the four primaries he participated in, but he has, at the lowest estimate, 13 delegates from currently-disqualified Florida. If Clinton succeeds in seating all of Florida's delegates as elected in the state's non-contested primary, she'll net only 28 delegates more than Obama and Edwards combined. Joe Trippi's fantasy about his ex-client as a kingmaker isn't that far-fetched.
This is almost as good as Gore endorsing him in two weeks will be.
By the way, did anyone else notice that Obama won a majority of women's votes?
Yes, not a typo.
Frankly, I don't see how Edwards has never really demonstrated much political courage. The timing here is entirely consistent with his general way of doing things.
Frankly, I don't see how Edwards has ever really demonstrated much political courage. The timing here is entirely consistent with his general way of doing things.
Damn it, that's "ever really demonstrated", not "never really demonstrated". @11 is a typo, @12 is not. Sorry.
According to CNN, Breck Man has 19 delegates. As a Super himself, that means he can deliver 20 delegates to O. That by itself pushes O's count over 2000 and means he might get to 2025 on Tuesday.
Frankly, I want to see both of them use wii fit.
@10
The majority of women's votes in which election?
@16 - Guam?
listening live from Edwards speech with Obama in Michigan -- sounds like a rock concert; the crowd is going apeshit
No, nationwide.
Well, Will, as far as I can tell the answer to your question is no. No, nobody else but you noticed that Obama won a majority of women's votes nationwide. Seems you've got that fact all to your own self.
It certainly sounds plausible, but with Will I'd really like to see a source -- make that three sources. Because I don't think very many states keep statistics on male vs. female votes. I don't think ANY states do; I think it's probably illegal. Exit polls do, though. Come on, Will -- whatcha got? Surprise me. Be right for once.
According to Will, Obama's got the majority vote of Democrats living in 40 to 100 story residential condo towers, as well.
Strange, elenchos, everyone at the Washington Post noticed it.
Guess you must only read Daily Kos and the NY Times.
Where Will? Where?
Just post the link. If you can't post a link for some esoteric reason, name the author. The date. Anything. Why can't you cite a source? Why can nobody track down where this stuff you say come from?
The weird thing is that when you make things up, there is no reason. It doesn't prove a particular point if your made up fact is true. It isn't funny. It is just like, some odd fact that sticks out a little but doesn't stick out too far. Except for the one detail that you made it up.
Why? Why do you do it?
Comments Closed
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).