<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Time for Irwin, Part III</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/04/time_for_irwin_part_iii</link>
<description>Back in the day, a handful of California artists were accused, often not so subtly by New Yorkers (a la Woody Allen&apos;s depiction of skin-deep LA in &quot;Annie Hall&quot;), of being too finicky about their works. They had to be installed exactly the right way, exactly according to specifications, right down to the smallest details. They were accused of being &quot;finish fetishists.&quot; Robert Irwin was a major target for the criticism (which later became more of a benign descriptive term, &quot;finish fetish&quot;), and he was, in fact, extremely particular about the way his works were installed and the purity of...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:34:35 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 12:07:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by elenchos</title>
<description><![CDATA[<blockquote>And his column succeeded: It was knocked over and broken. Meaning: It disappeared enough for somebody to miss seeing it entirely and to walk right into it.</blockquote>That is fucking hilarious.  I'm sorry if I don't understand art but come on.  Can you even parody that?]]></description>
<author>elenchos</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/04/time_for_irwin_part_iii#c990063</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/04/time_for_irwin_part_iii#c990063</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:41:18 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by unPC</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I've cleared out the spare bedroom enough for the column to fit in it. I mentally imagined it being there yesterday; today, yes, it is not there. Wanna come over and check out my art?</p>

<p>Oh yes the Philistines will laugh but the new absence-of-art-is-art art is provocative.</p>

<p>And more: all 6 billion people in the world have the same columnar vacuity in their houses, apartments, mansions, rooms, hovels and favelas.  </p>

<p>The new absence-of-art-is-art art:  giving "vacuous" a new meaning !</p>]]></description>
<author>unPC</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/04/time_for_irwin_part_iii#c990198</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/04/time_for_irwin_part_iii#c990198</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:01:51 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Cook</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I saw some of Irwin's works at a southern California artists retrospective during the 1960s and 70s a few months ago at the LACMA.  Your analysis of his work has really put him in a new light for me, but I think my favorite Southern Californian artist is still Turrell.</p>]]></description>
<author>Cook</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/04/time_for_irwin_part_iii#c990222</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/04/time_for_irwin_part_iii#c990222</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:17:52 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by tdb</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I don't think they're supposed to "disappear" so much as open up another space by refracting light, kind of like what Judd's milled aluminum boxes do by reflecting light...</p>

<p>...I'm glad that Bob Irwin's museum-oriented work is still getting shown, even though he's moved on to public art. His work during the transition from painting to landscape architecture is some of the most interesting work I've ever seen. His writings are more straightforward, relevant, and insightful than any critic's writing I've ever read. His bio has helped sustain a lot of people's studio practices outside of academia. Unlike most other artists who were successful at the same point in history, he has avoided becoming a self-parody, cranking out different versions of a trademark piece or style. He's an innovator and a risk-taker in his own studio practice. Sometimes that puts the actual physical objects in peril. </p>

<p>I imagine he might be pleased to hear about the destruction of one of the columns. Not because of any press it might generate, not because it might historically echo Duchamp's Large Glass, but because he seems to be quite alright with leaving his old work behind. </p>

<p>And have you seen how the Portland Art Museum has installed their disc? Ugh.</p>]]></description>
<author>tdb</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/04/time_for_irwin_part_iii#c990795</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/04/time_for_irwin_part_iii#c990795</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 12:07:22 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>