looks normal to me. i think that is the standard "airplane" hold. executed to perfection, imho.
Yeah, definitely the airplane hold. It explains why the baby is so thrilled. Also, who dangles their child off one arm? Baby isn't close enough to be balanced on the hip.
What, if I look at it sideways, is there a picture of Satan?
Who took "Puppet Baby" to market without my permission? PATENT MOTHERFUCKIN' PENDING!!!
What, you've never seen a baby with no legs before?
Yeah, that's the "Superman Baby" pose for sure.
But it is funny, once it's pointed out. Legless babies always are.
what matters to moms? as if moms are the only ones who care about parenting? Fucking sexist parenting magazine.
@ #7 Bellevue Ave,
I blame it on the only-stay-at-home-moms-are-good-parents-and-working-women-are-terrible movement. In their world only women are caregivers.
Or maybe it's been too many years of deadbeat daddies on Maury Povich. The editors probably figure that if they don't pay child support they're not going to buy a magazine subscription.
People, this is the airplane/Superman hold. It's not a Photoshop error. Anyone who has played with a kid instantly understands the photo. I guess digerati without kids do not...
All I see is a child cut in half.
some local rubes who have never played with kids
hah, hah - of course they think they are very hip and in touch will all things - need to ask mommies and fun dads who love to amuse the little ones
Finally a kid that won't be running around in the damn grocery store out of control!!!
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).