Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« The Invasion Has Been Called O... | Stupid Fucking Credulous Hack ... »

Thursday, April 24, 2008

How Great?

posted by on April 24 at 9:25 AM

great%20wave.jpg

That’s The Great Wave at Kanagawa (ca. 1831-33), from the series Thirty-Six Views of Mount Fuji, by the great Japanese master of the ukiyo-e print, Katsushika Hokusai. That particular one I took from the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s web site. It’s in the museum’s collection.

The Great Wave is just about as famous an image as the Mona Lisa. It is an incredible composition. Its supposed subject—Mount Fuji—stands placidly, eternally, in the background, but is captured in a split second, framed by a treacherous wave that threatens three fishing boats. The contrast between the foreground and the background could not be more stark. There’s no mystery about why this print has become an icon; it’s a masterpiece.

Unlike the Mona Lisa, though, it is a print. There’s not just one of it. But how many are there? Is it still a big deal to have one of them? That depends which one you have. And Seattle Art Museum has just this winter received a promised gift of a Great Wave from local collectors Mary and Allan Kollar.

I called SAM Asian art curator Yukiko Shirahara to ask her about the SAM Great Wave.

“Many people have this question,” she said. “Ukiyo-e print is public art of the time. They’d print 200 at a time, and we don’t know how many times the 200 were printed. Once they’d make a woodblock, they’d use it until it was worn out.”

That means that many, many museums around the world have Great Waves. They vary in quality so much that Japanese museums entirely devoted to ukiyo-e prints base exhibitions around demonstrating the differences between the early and the late. Early prints have clear, unbroken lines, and sensitive, bright colors, Shirahara says, before the woodblock was too worn down.

Determining which is which is an art, not a science, and Shirahara says she still needs to “check many points.” But she says she believes the one coming into SAM’s collection is early (like, she says, the Met’s), from when Hokusai was still alive and overseeing the prints.

“In the Kollar’s collection, those are earlier, which means the print reflect’s the artist’s intention more clearly,” she said. “Ukiyo-e is teamwork. Hokusai never cut the wood. He make the drawing and designate the color.”

With this gift, Shirahara says, SAM will have all three of Hokusai’s most beloved prints of Mount Fuji, The Great Wave, Thunderstorm Under the Summit, and the one known as Red Fuji. Here are the other two:

800px-Lightnings_below_the_summit.jpg

800px-Red_Fuji_southern_wind_clear_morning.jpg

See the rest of Hokusai’s Thirty-Six Views here.

RSS icon Comments

1

There used to be a huge mural of this on the old River Park Square building in Spokane. I remember thinking how awesome that wave was when I was 5 or 6.

Posted by erik | April 24, 2008 9:28 AM
2

And finally, you've posted something that isn't hideous. Guess we'll just have to wait until "Currently Hanging" to see a new monstrosity!

Posted by Aislinn | April 24, 2008 9:34 AM
3

Awesome!

And Aislinn, that was a really bitchy, internet-y thing to say.

Posted by Carollani | April 24, 2008 9:48 AM
4

Thanks Jen. Those are amazing.

Posted by It's Mark Mitchell | April 24, 2008 9:48 AM
5

@3: Yep! It totally was! Good thing we're on the internet!

Posted by Aislinn | April 24, 2008 9:51 AM
6

She's not a bitch. I swear.

Posted by w7ngman | April 24, 2008 9:52 AM
7

I've always loved that print, the first one with the boats.

Posted by Katelyn | April 24, 2008 9:59 AM
8

I hate everything.

Posted by Mr. Poe | April 24, 2008 10:04 AM
9

i'm starting to feel serene already just looking at it.

Posted by scary tyler moore | April 24, 2008 10:07 AM
10

I think it needs more bunnies.

Posted by squidoo | April 24, 2008 10:13 AM
11

I'm not a bitch. Everyone wants to be me!

Posted by Rupert Smythe-Lexington | April 24, 2008 10:32 AM
12

So modern-looking. the bottom one especially looks like an Elton Bennett (or should I say vice-versa).

Posted by Fnarf | April 24, 2008 10:36 AM
13

It's more ridiculous that SAM has hardly any Japanese prints, since they are such crucial and imitated images. With such a great Asian art museum, so many collectors and a major dealer of ukiyo-e in town it's more strange that the Kollars are the only ones donating such works.

As for a mass medium being included in the collection, someone please tell me why they display that laughably mediocre piece of Weller pottery in the American gallery.

Posted by bronkitis | April 24, 2008 11:04 AM
14

Bronkitis -- because no one wanted it at the garage sale? I've got a bunch of Frankoma that suffered the same fate last weekend. Maybe I should donate it to SAM.

Posted by Fnarf | April 24, 2008 12:21 PM
15

I love this print. I was thinking about getting a tattoo of it but felt weird about cultural appropriation. I then learned it's one of the more common tattoos.

I guess someone made a movie about the trend. Does anyone know anything about that?

Posted by Dawgson | April 24, 2008 2:29 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).