Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Shaming that Addiction Away

1

...soon to be an ironic logo at your nearest hot topic.

Posted by helix | April 15, 2008 12:34 PM
2

Sheriff Joe is a populist moron. He touts saving the taxpayers money by removing salt and pepper from the jail and serving expired bologna to inmates, saving a few cents a day, but exposes the taxpayer to repeated multimillon dollar civil suits for failing to provide basic healthcare to inmates, negligent deaths of prisoners, etc. Trying to subpeona the web records of the Phoenix New Times to see who was reading their exposes of him may be the lowlight of his recent idiocy.


Not to mention that neglect of basic needs has turned his 'Tent City' prison into a hotbed of drug resistant staph and TB infections. I wouldn't visit Phoenix if you paid me, and Sheriff Joe is a prime example of why.

Posted by Some Jerk | April 15, 2008 12:41 PM
3

No one with even the slightest degree of expertise in the field of either chemical dependence or criminal justice would agree with this moron that "shame" is a stop on the path to redemption.

Posted by Dougsf | April 15, 2008 12:45 PM
4

Not to mention the roles of guilt and shame in the cycle of addiction...

Posted by sw | April 15, 2008 12:48 PM
5

Reading about this fascist always drives my blood pressure up.

Fuck Sheriff Joe, and fuck the assholes in Phoenix who keep reelecting his sorry Nazi ass. Even law enforcement professionals from neighboring jurisdictions don't support him.

It's not nice to say, but I hope he gets cancer and dies a slow agonizing death.

Really.

Posted by Mr. X | April 15, 2008 12:52 PM
6

Nothing new here--those in power have always claimed that the poor are that way because of their moral failings, not because the deck is stacked against them.

I'm sure the recidivism rate for these t-shirt wearers won't move an iota.

Posted by Westside forever | April 15, 2008 1:30 PM
7

Parading a bunch of brown and black drug addicts around will sure keep white kids from doing drugs.

I mean come on. Most kids won't identify with these women. They'll think: I won't turn out that way. And the kids who might identify with poor minorities are poor minorities themselves. I doubt Sheriff Joe gives two tiny rat farts about the welfare of poor people.

Posted by keshmeshi | April 15, 2008 2:23 PM
8

I grew up in Phoenix. Scrolling up from the bottom, the picture was the first thing I saw and I knew it had to be Sheriff Joe.

Posted by Mike of Renton | April 15, 2008 2:53 PM
9

I think there just might be a pretty simple way for the inmates to avoid this treatment in the first place: obey the law.

Posted by john cocktosin | April 15, 2008 2:57 PM
10

@9: Of course! How simple. I guess we all forgot that drug addicts are rational actors.

Posted by Greg | April 15, 2008 4:15 PM
11

Sheriff Joe's style of punishment comes from the belief that if you make prison so incredibly unpleasant people will make sure they never go back. People vote for him again and again because 1.) The alternative candidate is worse than he is. 2.) Nobody gives a $hit about drug addicts in Arizona (most people in jail are there on drug charges).

Just read the comments made about Carol Gotbaum.
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/1002airportdeath1002.html
The general opinion was that her kids were better off without the junkie/drunken trash.

Posted by yucca flower | April 15, 2008 5:08 PM
12

I like Sheriff Joe, and will keep voting for him as long as he keeps running for office. He's got the right idea-why should we coddle a bunch of leeches who are nothing but a burden to society? And speaking of leeches, he's got the right idea about illegal immigrants too. Honestly, I wonder sometimes if you left-wing kooks weren't dropped on your heads when you were born.

Posted by Scorpion | April 15, 2008 5:30 PM
13

@12,

This is what a "Good German" looks like.

Posted by Mr. X | April 15, 2008 5:50 PM
14

@12,

Oh, and would you include drug using leeches like Rush Limbaugh, Cindy McCain and GW Bush who had the money to lawyer up when they got in trouble with the law in your little world?

Posted by Mr. X | April 15, 2008 6:46 PM
15

Of course not. They're productive members of society. Isn't that distinction obvious to you? Or did you get dropped on your head too?

Posted by Scorpion | April 15, 2008 7:42 PM
16

productive. interesting definition. silver-spooners and blowhards are "productive." huh.

Posted by ellarosa | April 15, 2008 8:21 PM
17

Yes, productive. I suppose you think those people in the T-shirts and on the chain gangs are more productive. You know, breaking into houses and robbing convenience stores never struck me as particularly productive, but if you think that way, well then, God bless your pointy little liberal head.

Posted by Scorpion | April 15, 2008 8:37 PM
18

Someone should do a parody:

"I Was A Rug Addict"

Posted by Will in Seattle | April 16, 2008 12:55 AM
19

What's an "alters boy"?

Posted by yuiop | April 16, 2008 1:01 AM
20

no scorpion, you idiot, i was not saying that the people who are robbing convenience stores are productive. i'm challenging your assertion that cindy mccain, rush limbaugh or george bush are any more productive than those people, in the end run. bite me.

Posted by ellarosa | April 16, 2008 4:13 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).