I completely agree.
This city should definitely be proud our pols finally had some balls on an issue like this. I think we are leading what will become a national trend - saying no to public funding of pro-sports. This is why Stern and the NBA have spent so much time threatening and fighting for the money. They know their financial model is broken, and without subsidies the NBA will have to do what the NHL did - take a 24% accross the board pay cut for all salaries. Stern and the players don't want this of course, they'd rather have money taken from important public projects and funneled to their already buldging pockets. It's pretty discusting, and even many of the players are speaking out against it.
We could start taking the position of Austin, where they are proud they haven't played the stupid financially imprudent game of pro-sports subsidies and instead invested in local music which has returned huge financial and cultural benefits to the city. Seattle should do the same - but instead the city spends billions on sports (and not just professional but also k-12 and University sports which is equally as disgusting) while spending city resources harassing the music scene and doing everything it can to shut it down. Time to get our priorities straight.
I prefer -
"we aren't *National* Socialists. We should not be giving hundreds of millions in handouts to *corporate interests,* while we have to maintain our schools, build transportation, fight crime, and maintain our infrastructure for the public.
I think the recession will further help to end the willingness of cities to play along with the pro-sports subsidies scam.
And I agree that it's sad that we won't have the Sonics around, but it's time to put an end to this enabling relationship.
Josh- we do have basketball teams here. They're called the Storm... and the Huskies (both men and women).
I'll go to those games any day of the week over a bunch of way overpaid daisies and their demand for subsidies (agreeing with @3)
I also agree,
I think this is going to come back to bite David Stern and the NBA. This entire scenario proves that a hand job to the commissioner has more influence that history, tradition, demographics or even economic sense for the entire league.
Look at Charlotte. The NBA soured the relationship with the city so much that they moved them to New Orleans, then the next year gave them an expansion franchise. Even though Charlotte is not an big enough market to support an NBA team. OKC is smaller than than both Seattle and Charlotte. So the taxpayers are going to build a stadium that they can't fill, so fans will get gauged at the ticket and concession lines for a crappy team (rebuilding anyway).
What should every other NBA team make of that? Any owner can sell out any team to any city and the NBA will make it happen.
David Stern is complete ass.
You are right, I am glad the Storm are staying. Which also confirms how big an ass Stern and Bennett are. Why split the franchise, unless they have no respect for the WNBA.
Old. White. Men.
I would be cool with the Rat City Rollergirls bouting at the key instead.
Completely agree Josh.
I think we should do a headstone over a coffin of the Sonics with a giant Seattle Space Needle stake driven thru their heart and a waving flag pennant that says "Not with our Tax Dollars, Billionaires!"
Is that clear enough for them?
good point, josh. it is, unfortunately, more difficult to take a stand when it may only serve to benefit others. it's be great if we called the bluff, and ok wasn't willing to subsidize either. i guess that will happen for some other city some other day.
@6 The Cougars have a basketball team. Calling the Husky Men a basketball team is a real stretch.
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).