Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Wag the Dog, Eh? | Obama Wins Vermont »

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

The Youth Vote, YEAH!!

posted by on March 4 at 16:08 PM

The youth vote has been a long sought prize. This year, research shows the sleeping giant awakening. There needs to be specific legislative goals to create an enduring involvement with citizens passing between the ages of 18 and 30. This agenda must come from youth itself, as well as the political establishment.

This is not the first time the youth vote has been stirred. Urged to Choose or Loose, voting was cool in 1992. At the same time, the economy was slowing and after 12 years of Reagan / Bush, the 46 year-old Clinton was a fresh face. Clinton made a point to speak to youth. That November youth turned out in the largest numbers since 1972. […]

It’s taken for granted that youth don’t care for politics. But things are changing. A new democratic vitality is being cultivated on the Internet. Youth are connecting with peers locally, nationally and internationally. Even old media, like television, is presenting politics in an entertaining way.

RSS icon Comments

1

You shouldn't be allowed to vote until you're 30.

Posted by Mr. Poe | March 4, 2008 4:22 PM
2

or women or colored people

Posted by vooodooo84 | March 4, 2008 4:24 PM
3

I'm sure ECB's cynicism about young voters is completely unrelated to their tendency not to vote for her candidate.

BTW, you forgot the link. Again.

Posted by tsm | March 4, 2008 4:25 PM
4

Everyone knows rock musicians can't catch. If they could, they'd play football. If they played football, then they wouldn't have any pent-up adolescent angst that drives rock-n-roll.

Also, rock musicians make terrible politicians.

Posted by Medina | March 4, 2008 4:25 PM
5

Turnout was actually good in 2006.

But Obama got the independents to vote.

Which is why he's winning.

Rock musicians make great goodwill ambassadors, cause they have the necessary skills of barfing on dignitaries, causing trouble, and insulting people they think are the help but who turn out to be important.

Posted by Will in Seattle | March 4, 2008 4:31 PM
6

Didn't forget any link. If you can't figure it out...

Posted by ECB | March 4, 2008 4:33 PM
7

Well, of course, Google is always there to do the work that you're too lazy to bother with. It's just that quoting things without noting their source in any way is generally considered bad form.

Posted by tsm | March 4, 2008 4:42 PM
8

I've always read the "youth vote" was something of a myth. 18-30 seems like a pretty wide net to cast as a demographic, but 18-24 year olds overwhelmingly vote for the same candidates their parents do.

Still, the more at the poles, the merrier.

Posted by Dougsf | March 4, 2008 4:42 PM
9

I wanted to know the source to know who actually typed "Choose or Loose." Does not voting equal promiscuity?

Posted by leek | March 4, 2008 4:45 PM
10

no link, no attribution, srsly WTF? We're supposed to read your mind now?

Posted by nbc | March 4, 2008 4:49 PM
11

polls
not
poles
@8

Posted by Will in Seattle | March 4, 2008 4:58 PM
12

#11 - "Poles" is way funnier, and probably more likely to get young people out, even if it was a typo.

Posted by Dougsf | March 4, 2008 5:40 PM
13

Still think Kerry v. Bush was in 2006, I see.

Posted by Fnarf | March 4, 2008 6:18 PM
14

Too bad while we're energizing the youth vote, we can't get them all to support things like capping social security before the retiring boomer generation drains the entire tax base dry. I'd sure like to stick it to my parents for failing to plan their retirement properly. A few years without money for PolyGrip and eating mush would do them good.

Posted by Banna | March 4, 2008 6:39 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).