its easy to see why this happened.
The officer did the citizen a favor by not charging him for the drug offense. The citizen got a pass and avoided having a drug conviction in the pointless war on drugs.
the review panel sided with the citizens here and reduced the officer's suspension because he did a good deed for the people, rather than the authoritative government.
The administration of the SPD didnt agree with that and don't want to encourage such citizen focused "softness" and would rather see a harsher punishment.
If they dont oppose this then that might show the ridiculousness of the war on drugs.
We could make it simpler for the SPD, just as we did over them wasting tax dollars on MJ enforcement.
We could have a citizen's initiative that requires that all future contracts and renewals for police services have OPD requirements for openness.
Wouldn't take long to get the signatures.
Comments Closed
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).