Hillary supporters at this point are either out of touch with reality, really republicans and possibly anti-choice and homophobic.

"Erica is clearly a McCain supporter. Her posts do nothing but split the democratic party in half allowing a GOP victory. Hillary supporters at this point are either out of touch with reality, really republicans and possibly anti-choice and homophobic."

Spoken like a true Nazi/HUAC/MCCArthy kool aid drinker.

Unity, unity, no more divisive personal politics, rah rah rah!!

About 47% of the delegates and 47% of the folks who have voted -- for Clinton -- are GOPsters sneaking into the Democratic primary and perverting the Ultimate and Rightful Victory of Our Saviour, Barack Obama!! There is to Be No Negative Argument About Him.

Anyone Who Disagrees and Who Challenges Our Orthodoxy Must Be Attacked -- They are Other, they are Unholy, They Are Satan!!

PraiseBHO! PraiseBHO! PraiseBHO! [say it enough, and you can drown out all countervailing info....]

(otherwise) ECB Fan,

Personal attacks within the staff? Must be a pretty bummer of a work environment. My gf is taking bets on how long before Savage fires Erica, whether fairly or not. That's a shitty thing to be betting on.

Next.

Piffle.

There's always HRC's wrong vote on the war.

HRC supports a partial repeal of DOMA, while Obama supports a full repeal of DOMA.

Obama supports driver's licenses for residents of the US regardless of immegration status. Clinton does not.

Then there's the "tactics" issue. Clinton attacked Obama for his "present" votes in the Illinois legislature on choice-related votes, although he had a 100% rating from NARAL.

Here's some kool-aid for you: Hillary can't win, no matter how tortured your analysis becomes.

Hillary = McCain, their is no difference at this point!!!

Hillary worked to help Nixon get elected!!

Does she lie on purpose or is it accidental? Does Editorial feel guilt for giving her a soapbox?

Interesting questions.

Seriously. Thank you for your unbiased reporting, honesty, journalistic ethics, and for bringing a touch of freakin' class to the SLOG.

You know, back in the day I used to be all like, "WTF?! Why does Eli always support HRC so much?!" But then I realized that just because there was an article or SLOG post about HRC doing well, it didn't mean that you LIKED her. It meant that you were doing your job-- reporting the facts.

You know, like, what you're PAID to do. And the fact that you don't stoop down to ECB's level and openly swoon over one candidate or another makes me respect you that much more-- I believe the things that you report because I have no reason not to. You post as many good things about Obama as you do about HRC, as many bad things about HRC as you do about Obama.

Hey, I dpn't think we even know who you actually support-- I mean, you could be a closet HRC supporter for all we know! Wouldn't ECB feel dumb then...

Journalistic ethics-- maybe you guys at the Stranger should have a staff retreat and let Eli teach y'all a thing or two about 'em...

Are you calling Erica a monster?

Ferraro is playing a feminist George Wallace. Wallace appealed to insecure whites who felt that their struggles and hard work entitled them to live in all white neighborhoods, and elitist judges shouldn't be able to force them to accept black neighbors and integrated schools. Ferraro is trying to appeal to insecure white women who believe they've put in their time and now they're entitled to get their woman president, and nobody should be allowed to take away their presidency and give it to the Black guy who hasn't earned it.

(and sorry for the bold treatment--couldn't resist posting this erica-style)

At the beginning of this primary season I was excited about both, though slightly more excited about Obama from a generational but Hillary has reminded me now of the nasty taste the Clintons left in my mouth during their second term. She's disgusting.

Clinton/Ferraro/et. al. cannot fathom that a black man born in the 1960s might win before a white woman. I think for them its generational hubris more than racial, but they are completely happy to play the racial/muslim/scary black man angle with ignorant "lunch pail" voters. To them the end justifies the means.

Not a proud moment. It ranks somewhere with womens' suffrage leaders in southern states playing the race card to get (white) women the vote in 1890s and early 20th century. Or Margaret Sanger flirting with anti-Catholic and Eugenics believers to promote legalizing family planning and birth control. They all probably thought the ends justified the means too.

And while I like ECB, I'm glad Ferraro stuck her oar in; Hills is now officially toast.

#1: Yeah, where was she? She claims to have been heavily involved with the workings of government while First Lady, leading to her unreferenced "testedness" and "experience". She was so involved with the workings of being President that she didn't know who was under the President's desk.

#2: And yet when it came time to actual action, Obama voted against immunity, and Hillary was nowhere to be found. (Another "where was she?" moment!)

#3: I completely agree.

#4: Missing the point. It sounds like he's saying what he intends to do and that has been confirmed by military advisers as possible.

#5: Widely debunked. Nice try, but it's lies.

#6: It's completely fair to say that Clinton's no more ready than Obama. if he ain't ready, she ain't ready. I doubt, frankly, anyone is "ready". As the adviser that Erica carefully sound-bit went on to say:

The question is and what Barack Obama raised is, when that phone call is received for each of them for the first time, who’s going to make the right judgment? Who is going to make the right decision?

More to the point... what is the antecedent for this eponymous "3 a.m. (in the morning, right Hillary?) call"? GWB's 9/11 "call" came at 9 a.m. Where is this legendary "3 a.m. in the morning call" notion coming from?

#8: Seven and one. Obama really said that. Too bad the union-obsessed Clintoids don't realize that Clinton (like her husband) really has been pro-offshoring. (Action, not words, are important, right Hill?)