ha! reason

So, yeah, it's hyperbole to say so coming from the Clinton side, but it's just as disingenuous for the Obama side to bash her, implying at the same time that HIS foreign policy "experience" is somehow superior in comparison.

So long as everyone acknowledges the fact that NEITHER has ANY significant foreign-policy experience whatsoever, then we can rightfully take all this for what it is - simple election year posturing.

Granted, her vote on Iraq was regrettable, but so then too were the votes of a majority of the other Senators who also voted "aye". If that's the ONLY issue of importance, then I guess that's what you base your vote on.

But, what about her stances on health care? Economic recovery? Immigration? Tax relief for working families? Our relations with other countries? These and scores of other important issues should also be considered when trying to decide which candidate to support, and yet it seems a lot of people - in both camps - have cast those other considerations aside in favor of allowing one single issue to overshadow everything else.

And that just seems to me to be a short-sighted, misguided, and ultimately foolhardy way of deciding which of these two is the better candidate.