Slog - Comments on No, In Fact, They Wouldn't. http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/03/no_in_fact_they_wouldnt The Eiffel Tower goes untouched.... Copyright 2008 Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:28:02 -0800 Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:45:29 -0800 http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Comment by markinthepark aww, damn

]]> markinthepark http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/03/no_in_fact_they_wouldnt#c983924 http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/03/no_in_fact_they_wouldnt#c983924 Architecture Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:59:51 -0800 Comment by Andrew So they've decided not to add on the filthy mushroom tip? The link is NYTimes restricted.

]]> Andrew http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/03/no_in_fact_they_wouldnt#c983933 http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/03/no_in_fact_they_wouldnt#c983933 Architecture Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:27:44 -0800 Comment by Pierre Fancois Dumont tres simple - the old guard vs. youth and change

tear the fucking thing down and start over for the 21st century

or, paint it noir, avec le pink lighting

all the youth of Paris loose their virginity on the 2nd etage - mas oui - often with le crowd clapping

]]> Pierre Fancois Dumont http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/03/no_in_fact_they_wouldnt#c983956 http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/03/no_in_fact_they_wouldnt#c983956 Architecture Fri, 28 Mar 2008 04:00:39 -0800 Comment by Login Had to bust out my BugMeNot plugin to read that. I thought NYT had dropped that whole logging in thing.

]]> Login http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/03/no_in_fact_they_wouldnt#c983974 http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/03/no_in_fact_they_wouldnt#c983974 Architecture Fri, 28 Mar 2008 06:51:56 -0800 Comment by Will in Seattle Darn, was looking forward to it. @3 is on drugs.

]]> Will in Seattle http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/03/no_in_fact_they_wouldnt#c984014 http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/03/no_in_fact_they_wouldnt#c984014 Architecture Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:45:29 -0800