Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Howto: Financial Meltdown! | I Get So Excited Sometimes »

Monday, March 17, 2008

McGreevey vs. McGreevey

posted by on March 17 at 14:18 PM

One confirms, the other denies

Jim McGreevey, the former governor of New Jersey, has confirmed reports that he and his wife had sexual encounters with a male aide while he was serving as a local official and running for governor, according to the Associated Press.

“This happened, this happened in the past, and now we need to move on with our lives,” McGreevey tells the wire service.

His ex-wife, Dina Matos McGreevey, tells the wire service that the published claims are “completely false.”

The McGreevey saga leaves me with a new appreciation for the dignified manner in which other elected officials—Bill Clinton, Newt Gingrich, Larry Craig—have conducted their sex lives.

UPDATE: Here’s the full text of Dina Matos McGreevey’s statement. Ah, the drama…

Theodore Pedersen’s claims, as reported in the Newark Star Ledger on March 16, are completely false and were prompted by Jim McGreevey. This all has to do with the publicity I have received since Governor Spitzer resigned. Jim has enlisted one of his cronies in trying to distinguish that situation from his own, and to discredit me in the media. He cannot stand it when I am receiving attention in the media rather than him.

This is not the first time. Jim started with a false claim, made shortly before my book was published, that I knew he was gay when we were married. The falsity of that claim is made clear on the very first page of Jim’s book, just as his description of our relationship in his book stands in stark contrast to Pedersen’s false allegations.

Jim again became the focus of the media’s attention, just one day after my book was released by announcing his intention to become an Episcopalian priest.

RSS icon Comments

1

Can't wait until it's Father McGreevey.

Posted by Tim | March 17, 2008 2:25 PM
2

Didn't dude write a book? Wouldn't McGreevey have put this in his "tell-all"?

Posted by Non | March 17, 2008 2:30 PM
3

It's so Melrose Place! Somebody had better name their terms.

Posted by Explorer | March 17, 2008 2:32 PM
4

Jesus Christ, McGreevey. Shut your pie hole!

Posted by Michigan Matt (soon to be Baltimatt) | March 17, 2008 2:36 PM
5

How could USA Today even think of writing this story without a picture of the third? I really can't follow the plot at all without a visual reference point.

Posted by eclexia | March 17, 2008 2:51 PM
6

Gosh, I wish I gave a shit.

Posted by monkey | March 17, 2008 4:24 PM
7

He NOW wants to become an Episcopalian priest! Holy sweet Gheezuz how dumb can some Gay men be.

Posted by Sargon Bighorn | March 17, 2008 4:33 PM
8
Posted by alan | March 17, 2008 4:39 PM
9

And the 3rd wheel looks like Elijah Wood when he played Frodo - I guess everything goes better with a little hobbit in it.... This is sooo bizarre it almost seems normal. Possible Onion headline - "First Couple Bags Chief Hobbit, Dinner To Go"

Posted by jackseattle | March 17, 2008 5:31 PM
10

While I'm perfectly willing to believe that McSkeevey had threesomes with his wife and an aide, I'm also very open to the argument that he's a lying rat fuck.

Posted by Kiru Banzai | March 17, 2008 7:01 PM
11

. . . ewwwww I know what a driver is, but what is a "travelling aide?"

(Thank you for the link @8).

Posted by Luisita, PhD | March 17, 2008 8:04 PM
12

I, for one, am pleased as punch to see a public figure copping to freakydeaky sex. It's fun. And if it was true, wouldn't his wife have every reason in the world to want to deny it? Women can internalize shame & live in denial with the best of them. I buy it.
-

Posted by christopher | March 18, 2008 7:05 AM
13

12, please refer to 2. you buy it? you want to buy it.

Posted by ellarosa | March 18, 2008 8:48 AM
14

Maybe so, 13. But it's like what Bill Clinton was accused of: Utterly inconsequential to Joe Shmoe if she did do it. So why protest so much? The "not dignifying that with a response, see you later" should have sufficed.

Posted by christopher | March 18, 2008 6:37 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).