Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Reading Today | Today The Stranger Suggests »

Sunday, March 16, 2008

Currently Hanging

posted by on March 16 at 10:30 AM

Unknown.jpeg
Chuck Close’s Lorna Simpson (2006), digital pigment print, 35 5/8 by 47 1/8 inches

At Tacoma Art Museum.

RSS icon Comments

1

"Currently Hanging"? What's wrong with you people?

Oh. Sorry. Forgot that you Hillary people don't know when you say something racist.

Posted by montex | March 16, 2008 10:59 AM
2

A painter/photographer produces a photograph of a painter/photographer.

Is this a great photograph? Or a good photograph of a great photographer? Is the value of this photo in the name of its maker, or its subject, or in some actual artistry of construction and realization?

New York City is a small town in some ways. Pictures of famous people are hard for me to appreciate without a difficult conversation about why I like these pictures: I think People, Hello! and US magazines have eaten holes in my soul.

Posted by Jubilation T. Cornball | March 16, 2008 11:03 AM
3

All I know is that, without knowing who took the photograph or who the face belongs to, that image just grabs you.

Posted by homage to me | March 16, 2008 11:16 AM
4

i know what you mean, jubilation t. in this case, i think there are some really great ones in the batch. i seem to recall that they were done with long exposures forcing each sitter to sit still for a little while.

hey -- remember that drink proposal?

Posted by Joey | March 16, 2008 11:19 AM
5

Joey, as regards that drink...are you hotter than Mr. Poe? Uncut? Incredibly smart, goal-driven, employed in a job with weekends off and possessing a motorcar?

Posted by Jubilation T. Cornball | March 16, 2008 11:48 AM
6

Remarkably engaging for digital, I always prefer classic "dark room" photography for its hues and depth - but this is good.

Posted by raindrop | March 16, 2008 11:54 AM
7

It's a good photograph of a great subject.

Posted by NapoleonXIV | March 16, 2008 1:37 PM
8

That place is such a D-List museum. They are showing photographs by Chuck Close, not his paintings?

Posted by tacoma | March 16, 2008 2:14 PM
9

RACIST!

Posted by Fonky | March 16, 2008 5:34 PM
10

Without the Chuck Close brand name this is just a pretty good portrait which in the digital age is achievable by millions of average photographers.

Posted by Average | March 16, 2008 7:48 PM
11
Remarkably engaging for digital, I always prefer classic "dark room" photography for its hues and depth - but this is good.

This quote is hilarious considering this series by Chuck Close is daguerreotypes. Digital prints of daguerreotypes.

Seattle is a small ignorant town in love with itself.

Recommence self-absorbed Flickr bloviating.

Posted by You're all tech idiots | March 16, 2008 10:36 PM
12

Hotter than me? Psh.

Posted by Mr. Poe | March 17, 2008 7:44 AM
13

@11: Quit yer bitchin'. I don't care how it was produced, this is a damn good photograph. Even an effete snob like you should be able to appreciate that.

Posted by Greg | March 17, 2008 9:36 AM
14

Yeah @11, you could have graciously enlighted me on my ignorance. Instead you had to be snippy.

Posted by raindrop | March 17, 2008 10:31 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).