Seriously--just because Dr. Laura's first name is Doctor and she has a radio call-in show, what entitles her to any credibility whatsoever?

Law enforcement officials confirmed to The Post that Spitzer didn’t want to wear a condom.

We do read her, though.

Her advice was awesome. I love it when women are blamed for everything.

@9 - I think she's always been animatronic.

This is all leaving aside the monumental dumbassery of Spitzer to do what he did, especially with the no-condom thing. He had to know that someone would catch him, even if it was the local sheriff. He could still be prosecuted, even after resigning. Maybe there's way more to the whole affair (no pun intended); I'm sure if people keep digging they will find more malfeasance. And there's still the question of how aggressively prostitution should be pursued by law enforcement, to which Spitzer is a hypocrite for strengthening that enforcement.

But it all just seems a little too pat, with a federal investigation, coming in an presidential election year (many thought Spitzer to be the next viable Democratic candidate in '12 or '16), in the middle of a Wall Street death spiral that many corporate raiders arguably blame on Spitzer to some degree.

People do listen to Dr. Laura and I hope and pray they lynch her for saying what she said. I wish I was joking but I'm not.
Please, somebody, ruin her career over this.

A client like that can be a handful when all you want to do is have sex, get the money, and have them leave.

Also, I take issue with the whole "monogamy isn't natural, thus we shouldn't do it." Going to the bathroom inside isn't natural either, doesn't mean I think we should revert back to outhouses.

Either because:

A. She's a slut
B. She's weak and incapable of saying no
C. She's completely ruled by her emotions, or
D. All of the above

He didn't fall prey to the "charms" of a woman. It's not like he was a sexually deprived guy who had sex with some cute young intern who flirted with him.

He's a guy who sought out and regularly paid for sex. BIG difference there.

Dr. Laura has no way of knowing anything about the Spitzers sex life and this was not just about sex anyway.

This was about doing what he knew was wrong but thought he could get way with, breaking the law, and being a power hungry, egoistical monster. I'm sure it was all very exciting but it was not worth the risk he took.

How is a wife supposed to fulfill the needs of a man that wants way more than any one human is capable of giving him?

Dr. Laura was just trying to make her ridiculous man pleasing book sell more and trying to make this scenario fit into her psychology. It just doesn't and she is an idiot and somebody should shut her up.
Listen to her and then tell me she is just a simple male pleasing little women.
She's a Queen Bee Bitch by nature and I think all this just please your man stuff is her talking to herself. There is NO WAY a woman like her is just rolling over for her husband.

Pleasing each other is great but Dr. Laura was way out of line and I"m no great women's libber either!

This rant is not aimed at you. I just started a rant and could not stop.

Embrace your kink! As someone who falls on the whore side of the virgin/whore complex, I've been dumped by guys because "you're not the type of girl you marry" or "because you make me want to do bad things". So they settle down and play house with the "wife" type, and then call me begging for something on the side because they aren't being satisfied at home. I hang up the phone. It isn't fair to the wife he promised to forsake all others for, and it isn't fair to me (who actually does want to settle down for a life of kinky monogamy at some point).