Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Another One

1

Holland has some of the most restrictive and close-minded immigration and asylum policies in Europe. They're even worse than Denmark, and that's saying something.

A hell of a lot of European countries don't deserve their 'open and progressive' American reputations.

Not to bag on Holland in general, which is a rad country t be white and Western in, but it's got a pretty ugly government at the minute.

Holland-style racist right-wing governments are pretty much the best argument against the current 'Arabization of Europe' meme that has gained traction among the American right.

Posted by Rottin' in Denmark | March 17, 2008 10:17 AM
2

God this just sucks. Why doesnt he just come here? I'm sure there's some raging rich homo here that would fund him... How depressing.

Posted by catnextdoor | March 17, 2008 10:19 AM
3

Murdering gay people = bad.

Posted by NapoleonXIV | March 17, 2008 10:33 AM
4

@ 1, I agree. Here in France, they really treat their immigrants like shit. Being a mexican in America doesn't seem so bad after seeing the abuse, dirty looks and close-mindedness directed towards turks here.

Posted by mintygreen | March 17, 2008 10:35 AM
5

And Europe's Arabs are there LEGALLY, for the most part.

Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty | March 17, 2008 10:59 AM
6

Think about this in concert with this story... thank you Stranger....

Lou Dobbs says:
on page 17 of his 2007 Independents Day

" Americans are defined by our rights we enjoy as citizens, and our Constitution guarantees a degree of individual liberty and freedom that exists in no other nation on earth."

High school and then more money for advanced placement in the work force.

That's what you get with grammar school.

My continuation with Mr. Dobbs book should be apparent by the end of this post and hopefully adds to our plight as humans as to the difficulties we face
in the coming year on our march to the Supreme Courts next Justices.

Conceptually I support Mr. Dobbs assertion of Americans rights definition enjoyed as citizens, yet I'll pull the conversation out of gear for a moment at the crossroads of Constitutional subject matter.

The Courts increasing support of pro business problen solving over other submissions for consideration, as attested to in yesterdays New York Times Magazine Sunday March 17, 2008 article prints clearly enough the authors ans editors words and the publishers permissive will for the moment.

That' the beauty of selling and riding the whim of polls and pundits.

Copy sells and the copy motioned into view of the sunday newspaper crowd was a message of certain special priviledged economic structure,

at the expense of of questions raised and innuendo possibly generated by the apparent cozy access of oral arguments presented and access to stylistic acceptance of method, jurisprudence, law and self respect.

Obviously, few want to raise the ire of a Supreme Court Justice if the chance of a judge being dispassionate or insulted personally could bring about a "washing of the hands effect", my use of a phrase denoting legal dismissives yet to proven because of decorum or legal ettiqette.

The pilot of the storms of life are as much the words of the homeless on the street in countries around the world as here in America, and many of us are concerned with the fight over religeous views, old testiment fears and the interpretations of the final arbiters before death as a business mans loan portfolio.

That's what I see as the real issues before the Supreme Court justices.

We have all ready been through history to the point of contention and Nuclear War in the last century.

The sins of the men and women and the karmic disruptions and biblical consequenses of the decision to use Nuclear Weapons and that energy and system of by-products are afraid to talk about when Big faces of integrity are called to the carpet to HEAL the effects and after effects of intentional wars and intentional digression from responsibility to end war.

One world advocates with sincere genius
understand that there have been periods of history when books, information and civilizations have been wiped out, edited or banned and burned.

In all firness to Mr. Dobbs, the commentary on his thoughts thus far are not stemming from personal antagonism or ideological differance with him personally as much as in todays information world is fickle.

Few texts and tomes make it to the superstar seller list and stat there long enough to be read by the masses for more than the average readers attention span; unless of course it is the right book for the right period of influence and specifically chosen bank loan.
( yes I wrote this BEFORE seeing todays in all but a cursory scan as walking by the paper box on the corner.)

That's the difference apparently in the haves and the have nots these days, and the respected trusted face of recognition.

The circle of friendship and the axioms of war where doctorines of 'keep your friends close and your enemies closer' is old school to most personal relationships in this day and age BECAUSE the stress and hectic pace of peaceful times or liberties of enjoyment are what the business men and women sell, conquer and divide over if money is the only motivator.

Mr. Dobbs market place share holders and handlers jostle and wrestle for prime time market face recognition spots where advertisers and information specialists insert the images of the day that will shape the collective choices of his viewership.... in effect making him an image or group of words his country and politicians are selling and supporting or not.

The ultimate demise of the news orginizations is primarily linked at this point to the coming testimonies of the oral administrators before the Court.

If Mr. Dobbs were the Dali Lama you might hear a different discourse in the halls of American jurisprudence...

especially after what happened before and after 9-11 and the news reporting and then the handshake of President Bush and the Dali Lama himself that was recently exploited.

That's the point of my interpretation that some maight call dark bemoanings.

I believe you'll have to have a discussion over the use of my placement of the words dark bemoanings.

Tom Yorke of Radiohead sings In Rainbows
" I don't moan ". I can't tell you what he means by that any more than I can tell you what you don't want to hear without asking him.

Either way it's second hand interpretation.

Incubus wrote a song with the phrase " Step Down " in it and I liked the melody. It became a slogan for anti-bush anti war radical youth.

Trent Reznor used the contiuation of that theme( possibly) when he sang in Year Zero... come on down come on down come on down.

When George Bush and Dick Cheney and the big finaciers of the world get together with the rest of the capitol gang and pull the plug on war and bombs and unethical testing on human beings and the planet we will have more healing.

Posted by danielbennettkieneker | March 17, 2008 11:01 AM
7

@6: Maybe a little more fiber would help with your verbal diarrhea?

Posted by Greg | March 17, 2008 11:30 AM
8

Remember when the Jews were a "disease" to be "treated?"

Posted by D | March 17, 2008 1:57 PM
9

@6 - Deft tilt from Dobbs to rock imbeciles (one of whom you can't even spell correctly.) Was this a dry run for some sort of paper you're writing?

Posted by Failing Grade | March 17, 2008 3:20 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).