Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Just for unPC | Great Diane Keaton Performance »

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Wonder What the Republicans are Thinking About November?

posted by on February 12 at 20:54 PM

12mccain02_337.jpg
Uncomfortable.

Here’s a stilted editorial that will appear in tomorrow’s Wall Street Journal.

They don’t sound psyched or even confident, but, with a little luck (please no recession, they pray), they think they can retain the White House.

They argue that the success of the surge will woo Independents back into their camp (who, they acknowledge, abandoned them in droves in ‘06). And ultimately, on Iraq, they argue that it may be “a wash” … which takes away an issue from the Democrats.

Really, they don’t have much innovative advice: McCain should pick a VP who’s credible, since McCain is old, and a VP who appeals to social conservatives. Unpopular Bush should stump for McCain, but infrequently and wisely. And, um, Clinton better get the Democratic nomination.

They also zero in on McCain’s bind: His strength is his weakness. The reasons he appeals to Independents are the same reasons he turns off social conservatives.

RSS icon Comments

1

Why aren't they mentioning that without increasing the length of deployments, the surge ends in April? Once that happens, casualties will go back up to 100/month, maybe more, since the Awakening groups will be in on the game. Then the surge will seem kind of pointless, like treading water when you're in the middle of the ocean with all ships three days away.

Posted by Gitai | February 12, 2008 8:57 PM
2

let's not forget who owns the WSJ nowadays...

Posted by don't forget | February 12, 2008 9:26 PM
3

"he turns of conservatives" is the most poetic mistake the Slog's made all day.

Grampa Munster, 08!

Posted by Andy Niable | February 12, 2008 9:39 PM
4

But McCain is still leading all the Democratic candidates in number of chins.

Posted by Jake | February 12, 2008 9:46 PM
5

all you need to know about these candidates is told through the people standing behind them.
Look at every picture with McCain...old white male bureaucrats.
Obama...passion, diversity, young, old, black, white, democrat...and yes republican.

Posted by mark | February 12, 2008 9:52 PM
6

McCain is probably praying to whatever deity he believes in that Hillary will be the Democratic nominee.

Posted by RainMan | February 12, 2008 10:06 PM
7

And I hope they're betting that Independents keep forgetting McCain's role in the Keating Savings and Loan scandal of the 80s.

Oh, yeah, and the $100k he received from Jack Abramoff.

Posted by NapoleonXIV | February 12, 2008 10:08 PM
8

@6--indeed. Rush and Coulter have already promised their firstborn to Baal to make it happen...

Posted by Andy Niable | February 12, 2008 10:20 PM
9

Look, they're in denial, and the Blue Tidal Wave is crushing them ... and it hasn't even HIT ...

Ignore them floundering around in the surf ... they won't get up in time.

Posted by Will in Seattle | February 12, 2008 10:27 PM
10

@7 Oh yeah, Keating. I don't know how I forgot about him, I went to high school 2 blocks from his office.

Posted by Mike of Renton | February 12, 2008 10:37 PM
11

I think Sen. Warner was thinking about pudding. Go back and watch the tape of McCain's speech. Warner is thinking about pudding.

Posted by Goldy | February 13, 2008 12:13 AM
12

@7, isn't it weird how the Keating 5 thing hasn't been brought up at all, lately?

Posted by Peter F | February 13, 2008 12:41 AM
13

A slight distinction given the ownership of the WSJ but it was a commentary by a fox news journalist not a WSJ editorial.

Posted by LMSW | February 13, 2008 5:18 AM
14

War goes well, then it's not an issue, other than why the heck can't we leave already.

War goes badly, then it's an issue that works against those who backed the war, and why the heck can't we leave already.

Posted by Midwaypete | February 13, 2008 7:07 AM
15

Whatcha gonna do when Obamamania runs over YOU!!!??!!

Posted by Andrew | February 13, 2008 7:10 AM
16

I support Obama, but I still think McCain is the man to beat. This grandfatherly, plain-spoken guy is going to be hard for Obama or HRC to best because our country is essentially conservative. McCain should be respected...and feared.

Posted by thomas | February 13, 2008 9:01 AM
17

thomas, the only reason i can think of to agree with you is generational spite - as in, my parent's generation (mccain's) are NOT ready to turn over the reins to my generation (obama's).

Posted by max solomon | February 13, 2008 9:14 AM
18

I think a bigger issue is the press loves McCain and will kiss his ass from now 'till November. They'll tell us what a great straight-talking moderate he is. Hillary doesn't have a prayer of countering that, because the press hates her. Obama might have a shot.

Posted by Orv | February 13, 2008 9:29 AM
19

I still wonder what the GOP's definition of "success" is. The surge increased the number of deaths by 50% in January as compared to December, and last I checked the "benchmarks" met were still at just 3. What is their rationale?

Posted by yearning | February 13, 2008 9:33 AM
20

yearning-
they have no rationale beyond CYA & leave a quagmire so deep it sucks the dems in too. all the king's horses & all the king's men couldn't put humpty together again.

Posted by max solomon | February 13, 2008 10:23 AM
21

Y'all had some pretty fucked up grandfathers if you think McCain is grandfatherly.

Posted by keshmeshi | February 13, 2008 11:36 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).