Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Today The Stranger Suggests | Oranges for Obama »

Saturday, February 9, 2008

Still Undecided?

posted by on February 9 at 11:05 AM

Maybe we can help. After all, we’ve been taking close looks at the candidates (and our own navels) since last fall.

scaled.ECBClinton.jpg


Here’s Erica C. Barnett on Hillary Clinton.

scaled.ESBarack.jpg

Here’s yours truly on Barack Obama’s unique appeal and his historic win in Iowa.

Here’s Dan Savage on John McCain.

Here’s Christopher Frizzelle on the difficulty of making a decision.

scaled.ESRonPaul.jpg

Here’s Jonathan Raban on the church of Obama.

Here’s Jonathan Golob on the case for Senator Hillary Clinton.

Here’s Josh Feit on demographic trends.

Here’s Annie Wagner on feminist complaints.

And here’s yours truly on Ron Paul.

RSS icon Comments

1

Where's the profile on Gravel?

Posted by Mahtli69 | February 9, 2008 10:41 AM
2

I changed my mind last night. My vote is going to _____. She can't haul that shit in November, anyway.

Posted by Mr. Poe | February 9, 2008 10:44 AM
3

And try this for a really detailed, yet easy to read endorsement of Obama that is nice and substance-y:

http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2008/02/obama-actually.html

Posted by Phoebe | February 9, 2008 11:18 AM
4

Just got off the phone with my mom in Nebraska. Sounds like that one is in the bag for Obama.

Posted by elenchos | February 9, 2008 11:24 AM
5

I'm buying Clinton, for health care.

If Obama will give up on universal coverage and leave out 50 M Americans and 750,000 Washingtonians, what good is his approach? Universal coverage and mandates are needed as Paul Krugman convincingly argued. This is our big chance. If you leave people out, the insurance companies will take advantage of that and I don't like an approach that doesn't make them cover everyone.

Clinton was also just endorsed by the American Association of Nurses.

I like, and trust, nurses. And no they're not all females.

Anyway I'm sure Obama will get about 60% in Washington today and I'm glad he's going to be on the ticket one way or another. All the Obama supporters make many good points and I'm sorry some of them have a tendency to react, instead of answering, when hard questions are raised. But that's not the candidate and hats off to him, too.

Posted by unPC | February 9, 2008 11:37 AM
6

I'm imagining the Dan & Boyfriend Debates being oddly similar to what a Hilary-McCain debate would be like:

Dan/Hilary: "We need a candidate that will get us out of this Iraq mess!"

Boyfriend/McCain: "Excuse me, but didn't YOU support this war?"

Posted by M | February 9, 2008 11:54 AM
7

Here's a thought:

Jan 20th 2009, SIX of the 9 supreme court justices will be older than 70.

Whom do we want making the next appointments? Who is more likely to win and be in office to do so?

@ndrew

Posted by Andy Niable | February 9, 2008 12:06 PM
8

@5--well thank god you're not a single-issue voter...

Posted by Andy Niable | February 9, 2008 12:08 PM
9

Darn SLOG spam filter. On wikipedia check out:

Political_positions_of_Barack_Obama

Political_positions_of_Hillary_Rodham_Clinton

It's a sad day when two wikipedia pages are the best way to compare the candidates on the issues.

Posted by Anon | February 9, 2008 12:17 PM
10

This college smells like Tacoma.

Posted by Mr. Poe | February 9, 2008 12:56 PM
11

we wont be seeing universal health care for 6 years...minnimum...to much damage to repair...first thing is fixing the economy...then we can start talking about spending money

Posted by linus | February 9, 2008 2:04 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).