This would make England proud.
This would make Germany proud.
The one that was around from 1933 to 1945 that is.
Under current law, when someone is convicted of a felony, they are required to be fingerprinted and to provide a DNA sample. As I said in my comment to the last post on this, Assault 4 is definitely the farest-reaching offense of this bill. It seems bizarre that people convicted of these misdemeanors would be required to provide a DNA sample, but not be fingerprinted (obviously if they're booked, they would have been printed).
How many men's DNA could they collect from the mouth of one prostitute?
I can see it now. Once passed, collection would begin at "charged with a crime" - not "convicted."
Comments Closed
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).