Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Smellmeand.com

1

What part of NSFW do you NOT UNDERSTAND?

At least it's better than the previous one, in that I didn't unexpectedly throw up in my mouth.

Posted by bma | February 25, 2008 4:20 PM
2

My work is really open-minded, but the site creeped me out enough to stop looking at it here. Isn't this sort of like buying used panties off of eBay? And who participated in the testing phase of this product - "No, that one's too fishy, let's take it back to forumula!"

Posted by Aislinn | February 25, 2008 4:23 PM
3

Slog has never been and will never be safe for work.

Posted by Ari Spool | February 25, 2008 4:26 PM
4

you can also use it to season your fish n chips!

Posted by markinthepark | February 25, 2008 4:26 PM
5

@1: If that picture of legs is not safe for your work, Slog is not safe for your work.

Posted by Aislinn | February 25, 2008 4:26 PM
6

This is really, really creepy. As open minded as I like to think that I am, what is WRONG with people?

Posted by Laura | February 25, 2008 4:27 PM
7

Your boss will be happy to see you're reading Slog instead of working, no matter what the images are.

Posted by Mike | February 25, 2008 4:30 PM
8

@1: What part of NSFW do YOU not understand?

Posted by Robin Sparkles | February 25, 2008 4:40 PM
9

Oh gosh, I could not get my jaw to close with that one! What a hoot.

Posted by Sachi Wilson | February 25, 2008 4:45 PM
10

Only the Krauts, bless their bizarre little hearts, would bring such a product to market. I wonder if their manufacturing is outsourced to the third world, like everything else?

Posted by Westside forever | February 25, 2008 4:52 PM
11

Ok, that's it.  I value being employed more than I value Slog.  Have a nice life everyone.

Posted by lostboy | February 25, 2008 4:56 PM
12

"Slog has never been and will never be safe for work."
Yay! The obvious has finally been stated! Thanks, Ari.

Posted by SlogSafeForWork | February 25, 2008 5:14 PM
13

Nothing is as sexy as a guy sniffing his own vagina hand. Mmmm tasty.

Posted by muggims | February 25, 2008 5:25 PM
14

The lady in the video thinks "vaginal" [vaj-uh-nl] is pronounced [vah-JINE-naal].

That's some Dina Martina sh*t right there.

Posted by KELLY O | February 25, 2008 5:26 PM
15
Posted by m-w pronouncer | February 25, 2008 5:45 PM
16

What the fuck is wrong with this mysterious M. Hickster that he found this?

Posted by Stacey Reed | February 25, 2008 5:53 PM
17

Coming soon, "Sweaty Balls," a fragrance for your own personal enjoyment. Brought to you by the makers of "Vulva."

Posted by Gabriel | February 25, 2008 6:13 PM
18

Seriously, SLOG, don't you get the basic rule?

If it's NSFW say so and be proud of it - but keep it below the fold - and if it's a link be EXPLICIT that it's NSFW.

Seriously ...

Posted by Will in Seattle | February 25, 2008 6:18 PM
19

And for those whose proclivities include the pursuit of posterior, the follow-up product is "Close... Behind"

Posted by Eric Arrr | February 25, 2008 6:33 PM
20

Smell my finger.

Posted by Fnarf | February 25, 2008 6:36 PM
21

Kelly O @14
yeah that pronunciation kinda made me giggle.
The voice-over also said or-JAN-ic for organic, as in "the precious orjanic substance"

File this product under totally weird but strangely fascinating.
Wow, Fleshbot reported it two and a half years ago.

Posted by Jamey | February 25, 2008 7:16 PM
22

Ari--please, please, please order it. I'm sure you can expense the cost. Give us full details on how it smells. Bring it to the next Slog Happy Hour and let the local Seattle readers give it a sniff. Please?

Posted by Papayas | February 25, 2008 7:56 PM
23

The deal with NSFW is that web pages can be seen from a distance by a supervisor or cow orker, and if they have skin -- even bare legs or brassieres -- the pic can get you in trouble from far away. Text, no matter how graphic, needs to be seen up close to be read.

Posted by Fnarf | February 25, 2008 8:06 PM
24

The mistaken assumption here is that there's anyone at The Stranger who has ever done a day of real work in their life. Therefore, they have no fucking clue what "not safe for work" means, and probably never will. So yeah, Slog is NSFW, and should be treated accordingly.

Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty | February 25, 2008 8:55 PM
25

You can disable images on any good browsers. Do it or go back to work.

Posted by Sirkowski | February 25, 2008 9:07 PM
26

Poor Bambis..... big bad boss man might catch you fucking off instead of doing your job.

Posted by drewl | February 25, 2008 11:24 PM
27

And what do you do for a living, fuckwad? Sell dope? Or do you have a "real" job waiting tables?

Posted by Elvis | February 25, 2008 11:34 PM
28

No, I help run a catering business. Last week I put in 61 hours helping cover for a co-worker on a well deserved vacation.

Cell phones and texting are banned where I work (thank jebus!) I work my ass off, and reading you cubicle drones whine 'NSFW!!!' makes me laugh and say poor bambi.

I read slog on my own time. Unless you work for yourself, or are paid to surf you are leeching off someone. Quit yer bitching.

Posted by drewl | February 26, 2008 12:16 AM
29

Some people here do work for themselves; some are paid to surf. Even they can't always have photos of half-nude women on their screen at work. And I'll be real curious to see what happens to Slog's beloved hit counter when all your "cubicle drones" stop reading Slog. BTW, I'm not one of them, but I certainly appreciate their concerns.

Posted by Elvis | February 26, 2008 12:41 AM
30

What, I'm not a 'fuckwad' when I post a reasonable point?

If you take the risk of surfing a site known for sexual content (among other things of course) at your place of employment, be prepared to face the consequences.

Personally, I'm a firm believer in the 11th Commandment:

Thou Shall Not Get Caught.

This is harder to accomplish on work computers.

Posted by drewl | February 26, 2008 1:09 AM
31

How much you wanna bet all of that site contains a computer virus or several ..? Storm Worm anyone?

Posted by treacle | February 26, 2008 4:56 AM
32

Next: Nutsent!

Posted by Heather | February 26, 2008 7:30 AM
33

Wouldn't that be "Nutscent"?

Posted by Big Sven | February 26, 2008 7:51 AM
34

Isn't that John Malkovich?

Posted by BeingMe | February 26, 2008 10:16 AM
35

It sorta screams HOAX - and look how similar it is to TOM FORD's pervy perfume campaign?

Posted by KELLY O | February 26, 2008 12:22 PM
36

Goddamn that Woody Harrelson is a genius.

What will he think of next?


Posted by ScrotalScents | February 26, 2008 12:56 PM
37

Wow. That whole vagina scent thing is creepy. Do people really like a vagina scent that much???

Posted by Kristin | February 26, 2008 7:20 PM
38

this shit is real tom ford is super pervy!has anyone noticed that the tee shirts and panties cost more than the beguiling scent?

Posted by matty | February 28, 2008 4:13 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).