<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Dirty Architects!</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/dirty_architects</link>
<description>Wait—they&apos;re all doing it. Working for bad guys, that is. Here&apos;s the story (thanks to the beloved C-Monster)....</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:10:48 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:00:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by K</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I fully expect, nay demand, a screed from Charles on the relationship of architecture and power, and why great buildings ultimately suck the human soul.</p>]]></description>
<author>K</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/dirty_architects#c950640</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/dirty_architects#c950640</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:21:57 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by cmaceachen</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, is architecture merely a business?  Is it merely about providing the design for a structure that will house various functions and seeing that design through construction?  Or is it more about expression of society's needs and desires, the zeitgeist, and where a society is heading.  It depends on the architect and the project, I know.  But the differentiation makes a difference.  Is it wrong for the New York Philharmonic to be playing in North Korea right now?  Or are they bridging a gap, allowing both sides to see a little more of the other?  Besides, I think the bigger moral issue facing architects is that of the shitty and inefficient shacks we keep building for developers.  </p>

<p>Also, some of us do, from time to time, take a stance on something: <a href="http://www.adpsr.org/prisons/" rel="nofollow">http://www.adpsr.org/prisons/</a></p>]]></description>
<author>cmaceachen</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/dirty_architects#c950670</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/dirty_architects#c950670</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:38:55 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Fnarf</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Didn't Philip Johnson deliberately use travertine in Lincoln Center to evoke the monuments of Naziism?</p>]]></description>
<author>Fnarf</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/dirty_architects#c950684</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/dirty_architects#c950684</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:50:39 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by max solomon</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@ 2: </p>

<p>yes, it is merely a business. one that has pretensions of integrity, but ultimately, we are whores. you've got to make money. howard roark was fiction.</p>

<p>the happiest architects i know are the ones who have gleefully surrendered all their ideals. building prisons, building walmarts, building indian casinos, building tacky condos in dubai with slave labor, building haute-bourgoisie retrotecture, or building crap 6-pack townhomes for developers who's cherished wish is to eliminate architects entirely, its the same thing.</p>

<p>if there was a job where you identified buildings that deserved destruction, i'd be a leader in the field, and bellevue wouldn't exist.</p>]]></description>
<author>max solomon</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/dirty_architects#c950701</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/dirty_architects#c950701</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:00:37 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>