Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Caucusing Each Other Out

1

That's so... anti-feminist.

Posted by dw | February 8, 2008 1:18 PM
2

Hillary has always been the right choice. Only sheeple will caucus for Obama.

Posted by Mr. Poe | February 8, 2008 1:18 PM
3

Given the circumstances, I think you're doing the right thing.

Posted by Mike of Renton | February 8, 2008 1:18 PM
4

That's really selfish of him. Total bullshit.

I'm sure DJ will understand that while you can snowboard 3+ months a year, every year, that you can only caucus for president once every four fucking years.

Go Dan, it'll be painfully disturbing if you don't go.

Posted by catnextdoor | February 8, 2008 1:24 PM
5

I agree with 3, I think you made the right choice. But, doesn't how many people show up at a caucus site affect the proportion of delegates they receive? Not that two people would make a huge difference.

Posted by Aislinn | February 8, 2008 1:27 PM
6

Then, are you gonna vote as a Republican absentee?

Posted by nbc | February 8, 2008 1:28 PM
7

if it's at stevens it might get canceled. they've been closed two days straight, and they're going to be under limited operations tomorrow due to the 60+ inches of snow and 100+ winds they've had.

Posted by some dude | February 8, 2008 1:28 PM
8

Why do gays want to get married again???

Posted by TheTruthHurts | February 8, 2008 1:29 PM
9

Oh Dan,
I'm so sorry (about Terry chosing Clinton, that is)! After all the scandals that occured during the Clinton admistration (travelgate, chinagate, whitewater, the list goes on and on) why does he support her?

Personally, I don't think she'll unite both parties, she doesn’t have the experience she touts (being first lady doesn’t count), and she hasn’t displayed the type of character/judgement I can stand behind (as evidenced by her blatent misreprentation of Obama’s record as of late). Hillary and McCain on the ticket is a timetravel ticket back to the 1990s. I just don't get it.

Posted by Tish | February 8, 2008 1:29 PM
10

This is a perfect example of why primaries are better than caucuses.... geez, we don't live in the 19th cent. anymore.

Posted by Polka Party | February 8, 2008 1:31 PM
11

Since you two are cancelling each other out anyway, you're doing the right thing. I'm just glad (for once!) that I live in a primary state and not some fackata caucus state.

Posted by Mike in MO | February 8, 2008 1:32 PM
12

Every child needs a father and a father. Given the circumstance, an excellent decision.

Posted by D Huygens | February 8, 2008 1:33 PM
13

I would argue that the benefit of going is actually the civic engagement and community/localized involvement that warms the hearts of individuals and makes them FEEL like they are impacting Democracy (because they are)

-however-

You already have a pulpit to do such. Your paper instructed countless people on who to choose, etc.

So not only did you cancel Terry out, you blew him out of the water in influence.

Have fun up there =]

Posted by Non | February 8, 2008 1:33 PM
14

I've got a word for these pedophile preditory preachers...how about calling them predicators?

Posted by Rome, Italy | February 8, 2008 1:34 PM
15

I want to caucus but I have to work. I work for the City. I don't understand how the City cannot release workers to vote... I'm pissed.

Posted by M | February 8, 2008 1:38 PM
16

Excellent decision. Heck, if our senators and representatives can do this (and they do, all the time), I see no reason why you shouldn't. And oh, BTW, nice to see that at least one of you has some sense.

Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty | February 8, 2008 1:40 PM
17

The caucus deal IS bullshit, for sure. Employers wont let their workers off for it, because it takes a few hours rather than a quick in-and-out primary in a private booth.

Posted by catnextdoor | February 8, 2008 1:40 PM
18

I live in fear that my caucus will be filled with people like Terry. Not just pro-Clinton, necessarily, but so virulently pro-any candidate that they will be prone to long, ferocious, spittle-flecked harangues about why their candidate is the epitome of all that is good and holy. I don't need that shit. Unless it's for Mike Gravel, perhaps - that could be amusing.

Posted by tsm | February 8, 2008 1:40 PM
19

Caucuses are ridiculous. Sort of fun in an anachronistic, isn't this an interesting display of democracy kind of way, but utterly unpractical. I'm with @11. Glad I live in a primary state.

Posted by Julie | February 8, 2008 1:44 PM
20

Dan, how can you say you are "cancelling each other out"? Good lord--as if your caucus vote were anywhere near as powerful as the impact you have online and in print (and on Colbert, and etc., etc.). Be a sport for godsakes and take Deej snowboarding and let Terry exercise his franchise. And how about that Stranger cartoon showing the Clinton caucusers as old farts and the Obama caucusers as pretty young things? Is your secret fear that you and Terry will both appear to be caucusing age-inappropriately?

Posted by Sarah@98112 | February 8, 2008 1:45 PM
21

Probably a good call.

But remember this, next time mustache-growing season comes around.

Posted by NapoleonXIV | February 8, 2008 1:46 PM
22

Stevens is CLOSED SATURDAY!!!

GET YOUR ASS OUT AND VOTE!!!!

Posted by Cato the Younger Younger | February 8, 2008 1:49 PM
23

Is the underlying assumption here that Dan is making a bigger sacrifice by not caucusing than Terry is? I don't see it.

Posted by Fnarf | February 8, 2008 1:51 PM
24

Along those lines, @21... Terry should say "you only get to caucus for Obama if I get to grow a mustache."

Posted by Julie | February 8, 2008 1:52 PM
25

Dan can't take DJ anywhere, because has yet to be a grown-up with a driver's license. So, I guess disenfranchising his partner *and* giving up his own caucus vote is the best he can do.

Posted by Shmallow | February 8, 2008 1:56 PM
26

I can certainly see being for Hillary or being for Barack, but I can't see being rabidly for either one - if being rabidly for someone also means being rabidly against the opponent - because they are both singing pretty much the same song in a different key. Well, there's more to it than that, but I guess I get defensive about Democrats being against Hillary or against Barack. I kinda love them both.

As a Democrat, how could anyone be rabidly against either candidate? Either one will be paradise compared to what we have now. These last eight years have made me very old. I can't wait to feel young again.

Posted by Bauhaus | February 8, 2008 2:01 PM
27

@26: Word.

Posted by Greg | February 8, 2008 2:05 PM
28

@26: Thank you and Amen!

Posted by Jerry | February 8, 2008 2:08 PM
29

Go and take your son, he'll remember it forever and be proud that his fathers had a voice in his future!

Posted by Lloyd Cooney | February 8, 2008 2:09 PM
30

..go to the caucus that is.. :)

Posted by Lloyd Cooney | February 8, 2008 2:11 PM
31

And your son has learned that maintaining his luxurious lifestyle is more important than doing his civic duty.

Democracy is not easy and sacrificing a couple of hours out of your lives is something that we need to teach our children.

I am not trying to be a scrooge about your son's snowboarding (and I actually think sports and competition is great for kids) but considering how many young urban voters I know who say they care but have better and more interesting things to do tomorrow it is a little disheartening.

It is tough to disappoint your kid so if it is a competition maybe you could get him a ride with someone else.

I just look at how many people I know who do not value the democratic process and telling your kid snowboarding is more important than voting seems like a prett bad early message to be sending.

Sorry to be a downer :(

Posted by Democracy is Not Easy | February 8, 2008 2:11 PM
32

Well said, @26--I agree and will ultimately go all rabid in favor of either the bro or the ho. It's just that tomorrow, Terry would make the rest of us in the Hill group look good. Unless he's already done the mustache.

Posted by Sarah@98112 | February 8, 2008 2:13 PM
33

@26

I'm betting you'll have atleast 4 years of McCain first...

Posted by You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me | February 8, 2008 2:13 PM
34

these little vignettes of life in the Savage/Miller household are just fascinating.

and, many gays ARE just rabid about Mother Clinton. I'm getting emails from fags I barely know, encouraging me to hit the caucus trail tomorrow to support "our" gal...frankly, I'm a little tired of all this rabid behaviour from BOTH sides, ("I'll vote for Hitler, before I vote for (fill in the blank of the Dem you hate")

If I remember my "To Kill a Mockingbird", isn't the cure for rabid behaviour, a shot gun blast to the head, delivered by Gregory Peck?

Posted by michael strangeways | February 8, 2008 2:22 PM
35

No ski bus? What is this world coming to?

Posted by superyeadon | February 8, 2008 2:22 PM
36

way to betray the republic, dan.

Posted by max solomon | February 8, 2008 2:28 PM
37

I am perplexed about the gay guys who are ga-ga over Hilary. Are they too young to remember? Sure I had an inauguration party when Bill was elected for the first time, and they had significant support from the gay community. It was soon after taking office that Bill capitulated and 'thanked' us with 'don't ask, don't tell'.

Posted by Lloyd Cooney | February 8, 2008 2:29 PM
38

I think the passes are closed Dan

Posted by Oscar Phillips | February 8, 2008 2:31 PM
39

you should bat him on the nose with a rolled up DOMA

Posted by Bellevue Ave | February 8, 2008 2:33 PM
40

Good way to teach your son about hypocrisy!

Posted by No Vote? | February 8, 2008 2:35 PM
41

DOMA..ugh. What was a disgraceful day.

Posted by Lloyd Cooney | February 8, 2008 2:36 PM
42

Yes, claiming that you'd just be "cancelling out" each other's "vote" is wrong on several levels.

Go to the caucus. Get the kid a new snowboard.

Posted by stinkbug | February 8, 2008 2:36 PM
43

Good way to teach your son about hypocrisy!

Posted by No Vote? | February 8, 2008 2:36 PM
44

My partner and I are both for Hillary and our neighbors are both for Obama. Maybe we can convince them not to go to the caucus so we can 'cancel each other out' and I can stay home and finish that tile job I have been wanting to get done.

Maybe we can all go find friends who are voting for the other candidate and cancel each other out by not participating and then go do other things.

Posted by Better things to Do | February 8, 2008 2:45 PM
45
And your son has learned that maintaining his luxurious lifestyle is more important than doing his civic duty.

Quoted for truth.

Posted by Anon | February 8, 2008 2:46 PM
46

Dan, all three passes are closed, closed, closed. No excuses now for not going. You will be hazed forever.

Posted by Dave Coffman | February 8, 2008 2:48 PM
47

Oh 31, fuck off.

But can I just say, Yay Terry! I do like Obama a very lot, and will be delighted to support him if he is the nominee, but I just like Hillary better. I like her very specific, detailed positions on most things, I like the fact that the people of NY are very happy with her, and I think she's very unlikely to make the kinds of "rookie" errors that Bill made, or that I think Obama would make.

It's true that we need a change, and I am confident that eventually we'll get it. But Obama isn't going to plop his toothbrush in the holder in the Presidential bathroom and rewrite how Washington works.

Clinton has an advantage in having been an outside insider (as First Lady) and an inside outsider (as Senator). I like her, I trust her, I believe her, I think she's very smart and more importantly, experienced and practical.

One more time, Yay Terry! I'm with you.

Posted by Leigh | February 8, 2008 2:49 PM
48

In other circumstances the term "pussy-whipped" might be used.

Posted by duh | February 8, 2008 2:50 PM
49

@44: I know, yeah--think how much a pair of superdelegates could accomplish that way come Convention time, too.

Posted by Sarah@98112 | February 8, 2008 2:51 PM
50

I'm so glad my boyfriend was rabid about Edwards. Now that Edwards is out, the boyfriend will stay home AND I'll caucus for Obama.

Posted by Nandor | February 8, 2008 2:57 PM
51

Dan - the thing is, a caucus isn't just about casting a vote. It is about talking to your neighbors and making a case for the candidate you support. Who is to say you couldn't have convinced more people to vote for Obama than he could for Clinton? By not participating, you persuasiveness is lost.

Posted by Daniel K | February 8, 2008 3:04 PM
52

Yes - why bother? The caucuses will be so Obama-ized. This won't be Iowa in some neighbor's aroma-filled kitchen with coffee on the stove - this will be push/shove/where-do-I-go madness.

Thank you local Dem leaders for this arcane caucus idiocy. I'm currently on a crutch; if there is no parking at SAAM, I'll have to leave. How about a real primary next time instead of a potential so-called democracy-inspired riot?

Not to mention, I don't need a sermon, a lecture or an ad campaign from anyone who's not for my candidate. I already know how I'm going to vote. Can't I just do it quietly somewhere (voting booth) by myself (secret ballot).

I expect The Stranger to form a vanguard and abolish this archaic insanity.

Go skiing Dan without rue.

Posted by RHETT ORACLE | February 8, 2008 3:07 PM
53

Normally I would so “Go snowboarding, and cancel out that way” but this is not the normal caucus. This is a historic moment in our nation. You have chance to go as a family and decide who the next president of this country is going to be. That person is going to be a black man or a white woman: either way a momentous piece of our history.

It is magic to be in a room with so many people who care as much as you about our collective future. If this snowboard event will change your son’s life more than participating in our history, by all means go. If not, get to that caucus and get rowdy!

Posted by AK Rob | February 8, 2008 3:19 PM
54
And your son has learned that maintaining his luxurious lifestyle is more important than doing his civic duty.

Extra quoted for truth.

Posted by Oh | February 8, 2008 3:20 PM
55

@50

In the Alaska caucus Edwards was still in the pool. If the caucus really gets rocking people who caucus for the "losing" candidates can trade their votes for promises of delegates.

Even if your candidate has withdrawn you can still have pull!

Posted by AK Rob | February 8, 2008 3:28 PM
56

Cool. Any Clinton supporters on First Hill want to cancel out my Obama vote so we don't have to caucus?

Posted by SeattleBrad | February 8, 2008 3:33 PM
57

"...but only if you go too?" Dan, it's a trap! He's planning to drive you up to the mountains, dump you off, and leave you stranded there while he drives back to caucus for Hils!!! Don't do it, Dan!!

Posted by erika | February 8, 2008 3:35 PM
58

@55: Oh stop. At this rate I'll need a 3-way to cancel me out of this thing.

Posted by Sarah@98112 | February 8, 2008 3:43 PM
59

You should listen to Terry, Dan.

:o)

Posted by Wes | February 8, 2008 4:21 PM
60

The reason you are doing the right thing is that you're choosing to spend your time doing something important (spending time with your child) as opposed to doing something utterly and totally irrelevant to anything (engaging in any type of political activity.) Period. End of discussion.

Posted by Wowza | February 8, 2008 8:01 PM
61

Net result: Win for DJ! I think both candidates would approve, as do I. :D

Posted by CheshireKatz | February 9, 2008 1:22 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).