Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« The Gates of Socialism | Hello, Scientology. We are Ano... »

Friday, January 25, 2008

The Ghost Whisperer

posted by on January 25 at 9:59 AM

What the fuck?

Via Sullivan.

RSS icon Comments

1

is that a unedited clip?

Posted by vooodooo84 | January 25, 2008 10:02 AM
2

OMFG! It's the Voice of the Archangel Moroni telling him to raise taxes!

Posted by NapoleonXIV | January 25, 2008 10:07 AM
3

Has the republican party degenerated in the debate technology race? Bush had a reciever, and Romney has some dude talking softly?

Posted by vooodooo84 | January 25, 2008 10:09 AM
4

Was that John Mccain? I watched the debate and didn't hear that whisper, but other stuff was going on around me.

I remember McCain was standing next to Romney, who was on the end. It kind of sounds like McCain's voice, but everyone knows McCain hates Romney.

If it wasn't McCain, who the hell was it? We deserve to know!


Thanks for posting this.

Posted by ghostlawns | January 25, 2008 10:09 AM
5

Eternity Calvin Klein!!!

Posted by Boomer in NYC | January 25, 2008 10:13 AM
6

Haley Joel Osment?

Posted by DOUG. | January 25, 2008 10:18 AM
7

He hears ideas that will make him a dead person!

And he knows that he'll be dead!

Walk into the Light, Mitt Romney--you can save Social Security by walking into the Light!

Mommy's in the Light, Mitt Romney!

So's Freckles!

Posted by NapoleonXIV | January 25, 2008 10:21 AM
8

That Romney needs all the light he can get, since he has two bottomless blackholes where his eyes should be.

Posted by orangekrush | January 25, 2008 10:31 AM
9

awww, Freckles, i miss the Freckles...*tear

Posted by pissy mcslogbot | January 25, 2008 10:34 AM
10

Maybe it was the little voice that comes from where his soul should be.

Posted by superyeadon | January 25, 2008 10:34 AM
11

I have been experiencing a very strange sense lately that whenever candidates say that they're not going to raise taxes, that it's like in elementary school when we were practicing government and the "candidates" would promise longer recesses and longer lunch periods.

Posted by dewsterling | January 25, 2008 10:41 AM
12

@ DOUG. - Hah!

Posted by Lloyd Clydesdale | January 25, 2008 11:00 AM
13

The white salamander of Cumorah speaking in reformed Egyptian.

Posted by Osmond SuperFan | January 25, 2008 11:20 AM
14

I think the voice is Russerts

Posted by Bald Face Lie | January 25, 2008 11:33 AM
15

It may be an aide in his earpiece giving him a clue as to what Russert is alluding to. I think they all wear them.

Posted by Sara | January 25, 2008 11:35 AM
16

@15-yes it is a clue so he doesn't look dumb. But, I think the real question is who said it. Apparently, his earpiece was on the same frequency as the moderators table-but his people deny it.

Posted by yearning | January 25, 2008 11:40 AM
17

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

HIS UNDERWEAR IS MORE INTERESTING

FIVE SONS, GOD, VIRILITY WITHOUT END

ONE NAKED PIC, PLEASE FROM SOMEWHERE, PLEASE, FOR ME AND MR. POE

PLEASE

Posted by JESUS GOMEZ | January 25, 2008 11:58 AM
18

I don't understand the joke? Having a Religous Extremist in the white house is no joke. Where's the joke?

Posted by Sargon Bighorn | January 25, 2008 11:59 AM
19

I don't get why this is a big thing. Its pretty clearly one of the other candidates or one of the moderators.

Posted by Giffy | January 25, 2008 12:11 PM
20

@19: Or the feed from his in-ear microphone telling him what to say? Which he may very possibly liken to his Lord?

Posted by Sam M. | January 25, 2008 12:14 PM
21

Microphones don't feed, they receive. He's talking into a microphone, and if he's got an ear speaker, that voice isn't coming from it. Sonically it's just impossible -- do you have any idea how loud an earbud would have to be to be picked up by the mike? It wouldn't sound like whispering. My guess is wireless interference picking up some other signal, but it could be as simple as McCain's mike that someone forgot to turn down.

Not a story.

Posted by Fnarf | January 25, 2008 1:03 PM
22

Reagan raised the retirement age to 67 from 65 for most of us and introduced a 25 percent tax on social security benefits for (relatively) high-income retirees - the first substantive changes to this program since the 1970s when benefits were indexed to increase each year at the same rate of the cost of the living -- kind of significant revisions to a hugely successful program that proves that the US can reduce poverty (it cut the poverty rate of those over 65 from 22 percent to 11 percent with indexing). It's more than disturbing that a Presidential candidate did not KNOW this -- and it's truly bizarre that whatever policy wonk was whispering in his ear was just as ignorant. The fact that no one knew it was a tax further shows that there was little disagreement about taxing it either. Yikes...

Posted by Susan | January 25, 2008 1:46 PM
23

if Mitt does sperm banks, that would be dandy

I have a desire for a male child, can anyone help?

single lady, mega bucks, don't do the old fashioned way, sperm like Mitt has ??? where ???

Posted by selmae | January 25, 2008 4:49 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).