<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on That Einstein Guy Might Be Onto Something</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin</link>
<description> At the American Astronomical Society meeting in Austin, Texas, Treu unveiled the first-ever image of a double Einstein ring. It shows an obscure galaxy in Leo, designated SDSS J0946+1006 for its coordinates in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, encircled by two concentric glowing rings. These aren&apos;t part of J0946 itself, but are the strongly distorted images of more distant galaxies strung out behind it like beads on a string. This is a spectacular example of a phenomenon called gravitational lensing. It&apos;s caused by the distortion of space-time by massive objects. While formulating his general theory of relativity, Albert Einstein...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:34:47 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:29:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Sachi Wilson</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Gravitational lenses have been found in many, many instances in the last ten or twenty years, at least.  That's nothing new.  </p>

<p>But that pic is a nice ring!</p>]]></description>
<author>Sachi Wilson</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896314</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896314</guid>
<category>Science</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:06:33 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by kid icarus</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Nerdgasm!</p>]]></description>
<author>kid icarus</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896316</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896316</guid>
<category>Science</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:07:42 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by notonthehill</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This is cool.  </p>

<p>Let's hope the James Webb Telescope stays on track and flies without a hitch.  We won't have a shuttle replacement for quite some time to do a repair mission (hell we might not even have the James Webb Telescope) if Obama is elected.</p>]]></description>
<author>notonthehill</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896323</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896323</guid>
<category>Science</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:18:02 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Fifty-Two-Eighty</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that info on Obama. I didn't know he was anti-space program. I guess it figures, though. He probably thinks the money would be better spent on junkies and welfare mothers.</p>]]></description>
<author>Fifty-Two-Eighty</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896336</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896336</guid>
<category>Science</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:45:55 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by flash gordon</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I like Obama. I also like NASA. I think eight years of Obama would be a good thing. NASA will still be there, and the further we go, the more important NASA will seem. Obama is smart enough to see value in things. NASA may or may not be valuable in the next eight years. Obama definitely will. I'll take the trade off for now.</p>]]></description>
<author>flash gordon</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896464</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896464</guid>
<category>Science</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:42:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Toby</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Has anything Einstein ever came up with been disproven? Seriously does anyone know?</p>

<p>That dude rocked.</p>]]></description>
<author>Toby</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896501</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896501</guid>
<category>Science</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:22:09 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jonathan Golob</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Einstein's ideas about quantum mechanics--how atoms are held together--were pretty wrong.</p>

<p>In fact, one of his more famous quotes ("God doesn't play dice with the Universe") was from a scientific argument he ultimately lost.</p>

<p>But yeah, the dude rocked.</p>]]></description>
<author>Jonathan Golob</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896513</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896513</guid>
<category>Science</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:03:59 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mr. Poe</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Psh. Albert Einstein was an idiot.</p>]]></description>
<author>Mr. Poe</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896518</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896518</guid>
<category>Science</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:15:55 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RonK, Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The galaxy and the spinning dancer: P-I online has an image of galaxy NGC 4622, which appears to be spinning the wrong way". </p>

<p>As with the mindfucking image of the twirling girl, you can tell which direction -- clockwise or counterclockwise -- is real IF you can determine which spiral foot is the <i>front</i> foot.</p>

<p>Unlike the case of the perky dancer, science may be able to tell hos this one is leaning.</p>

<p>Unfortunately, not even the Hubble is powerful enough to detect the galaxy's nipples (if any).</p>]]></description>
<author>RonK, Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896541</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896541</guid>
<category>Science</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:57:50 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mike</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Or maybe God put that ring there to test our faith.</p>]]></description>
<author>Mike</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896608</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896608</guid>
<category>Science</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:17:35 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Orv</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@10: Probably!  I mean, the Bible says nothing of gravitational lenses, so how can they exist?<br />
</p>]]></description>
<author>Orv</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896655</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896655</guid>
<category>Science</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:46:33 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by crazycatguy</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Einstein was an advocate for the steady state universe, which contradicted his equations for general relativity. In order to make the equations work, he hypotheised the cosmological constant, which he later aknowledged to be in error. </p>]]></description>
<author>crazycatguy</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896663</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896663</guid>
<category>Science</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:48:29 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by COMTE</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this is a pretty spectacular example of gravitational lensing, but the phenomenon has been observed for nearly a century, starting with Eddington's observational confirmation of Einstein's postulation in 1919.</p>]]></description>
<author>COMTE</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896822</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/that_einstein_guy_might_be_onto_somethin#c896822</guid>
<category>Science</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:29:28 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>