<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Re: That Horrible Bill Josh Was Talking About</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/re_that_horrible_bill_josh_was_talking_a</link>
<description>I covered refund-anticipation loans in a few columns in 2004; at the time, Tom Rasmussen was fighting against them, and Sharon Tomiko-Santos was fighting him as hard as she could. I mean, if Seattle&apos;s progressive South End rep doesn&apos;t stand up for usurious payday lenders, who will? Here&apos;s what I wrote then: Seattle Rep. Sharon Tomiko-Santos is sponsoring a bill that would undercut a Seattle law regulating tax-refund-anticipation loans, which provide fast cash against anticipated income-tax refunds, often at astronomical interest rates. Although the law has been stripped of some of its more heinous provisions, many serious problems--including watered-down disclosure...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:49:37 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:11:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Wonder why our Seattle delegation to the State is fighting so hard to hurt Seattle?</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/re_that_horrible_bill_josh_was_talking_a#c916625</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/re_that_horrible_bill_josh_was_talking_a#c916625</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:48:48 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Karlheinz Arschbomber</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I just read the title of this post, I just assumed it was Yet Another Story From ECB about the Clintons.</p>]]></description>
<author>Karlheinz Arschbomber</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/re_that_horrible_bill_josh_was_talking_a#c916672</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/re_that_horrible_bill_josh_was_talking_a#c916672</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:59:36 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bellevue Ave</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>no, ecb is trying to gravy train on josh's post. </p>

<p>"I covered refund-anticipation loans in a few columns in 2004" </p>

<p>want a cookie?</p>]]></description>
<author>Bellevue Ave</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/re_that_horrible_bill_josh_was_talking_a#c916819</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/re_that_horrible_bill_josh_was_talking_a#c916819</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:46:48 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Cookie Monster</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes.</p>

<p>Is it organic?</p>]]></description>
<author>Cookie Monster</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/re_that_horrible_bill_josh_was_talking_a#c917001</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/re_that_horrible_bill_josh_was_talking_a#c917001</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:42:20 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bellevue Ave</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>lmao, i love you cookie monster</p>]]></description>
<author>Bellevue Ave</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/re_that_horrible_bill_josh_was_talking_a#c917359</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/re_that_horrible_bill_josh_was_talking_a#c917359</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:04:35 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Larkin</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I suggest Sharon Tomikos-Santos, who is very left, and I live in her District --- I think she is more in touch with the folks in her district than the very well paid liberal  city council members.</p>

<p>At times poorer folk need cash, like for rent and food. Tom and the other upper middle class crusaders are NEVER in that place.</p>

<p>A few more bucks of cost for the money is incidental to the great need. But of course, the poor can't manage their money or think well.</p>

<p>The middle class who pay credit card monster banks 26-31 percent interest are so fucking money management  shrewd. That is where the real big time public extortion is taking place. Immoral rates on credit cards - look into it Erica.</p>

<p>Table the topic for the long session next year. </p>

<p>(And, yes, a pay day loan once saved my ass big time - well worth the fees)<br />
</p>]]></description>
<author>Larkin</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/re_that_horrible_bill_josh_was_talking_a#c917479</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/re_that_horrible_bill_josh_was_talking_a#c917479</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:43:14 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bellevue Ave</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Larkin, I defy you to find a responsible person who pays 26-31% who hasnt missed a payment or hasnt gone over their limit. </p>]]></description>
<author>Bellevue Ave</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/re_that_horrible_bill_josh_was_talking_a#c917658</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/re_that_horrible_bill_josh_was_talking_a#c917658</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:11:07 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
