Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Marijuana Grow Operation Busted

1

Obviously the only people from that middle school buying that pot were the teachers.

Posted by boxofbirds | January 10, 2008 3:12 PM
2

"where God intended" ? Huh? God does not exist.

Posted by Just Me | January 10, 2008 3:15 PM
3

Alarmist bullshit, but that's what sells papers. The reality is still that grow operations are extremely dangerous to live near - they go up in flames here in SF from time to time (not just because of the lamps, but the necessary sketchy illegal electric work being done to tap into the power grid and circumvent the meter).

Not defending the attitude in the article, but just because it's "only weed", doesn't mean the house isn't going to get shot up. (some friends of mine that had a few plants, and made a whole lotta cash, got their door kicked in and shotguns shoved in their mouths by local thugs a few years ago)

Posted by Dougsf | January 10, 2008 3:33 PM
4

In Michael Pollan's book "The Botany of Desire" he makes a very compelling case that cannabis is quickly evolving to fill a niche few plants have the opportunity to compete in: suburban attics and basements.

Posted by Michael J Swassing | January 10, 2008 3:41 PM
5

@ 3 That is what I said yesterday about the women that was shot by police. Eventually, some pothead high on weed is going to shot the place up

Posted by Touring | January 10, 2008 3:41 PM
6

When I spark up I barely have the wherewithal to aim the remote at QVC.

Posted by Hooty Sapperticker | January 10, 2008 3:45 PM
7

When I spark up I barely have the wherewithal to aim the remote at QVC.

Posted by Hooty Sapperticker | January 10, 2008 3:45 PM
8

Yeah, all true. But I think Dan's point was that if it was legal, none of this would be an issue. Hell, it was only made illegal in the firrt place because of a lot of misinformed people afraid that the "pickaninnies" (to use one of the many words used back then) would get high and rape their lily-white daughters.

Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty | January 10, 2008 3:46 PM
9

Its illegal because some very rich men that grew trees and sold newspapers wanted to stay rich. It's illegal because people are lemmings and like to be told what to do and how to do it and that it's "for the children". It's illegal because not enough people have the balls to tell the truth and say they smoke it or know people that do.
Oh, gads...I'm all riled up now.Grrr.

Posted by mugims | January 10, 2008 3:57 PM
10

#8 - if that was the point, then I agree 100%. Just the IDEA of pot growing near children should be the least of their worries. There's probably more meds in those little kids backpacks to fill a Wallgreens anyhow. I'm just saying, pot houses can be extremely sketchy places.

#5 - "Potheads", per say, aren't exactly what I mean. Where there's piles of illicitly made money, there's trouble.

Posted by Dougsf | January 10, 2008 4:03 PM
11

I live a block away from there. Last night there were 6 cop cars and a police helicoptor circling overhead. I thought it was going to turn out to be a hostage situation or something. Then I read the headlines and saw it was a lame old pot bust and instantly felt sorry for the guys. I've never seen anything shady going on over there.

Posted by teenburger | January 10, 2008 4:04 PM
12

a grow operation isn't a big deal, but it's a pain in the ass once the weed matures and they start selling it out of the basement. then it becomes a parking enforcement problem.

Posted by superyeadon | January 10, 2008 4:06 PM
13

I always recommend Canada.

The CBC has a new TV series, iPod, or something like that, that started last night, about a nice North Vancouver family whose kid works for a dot com and whose mom has a grow farm in the basement that she occassionally has to kill guys over.

It's kind of sweet, although why they stuck the body in Kitsilano I'll never know, that's the last place to ditch a corpse, it's right next to the CFB Chilliwack's Vancouver Regional HQ.

I always recommend off the docks near the ferries. Or the Capilano Suspension Bridge.

Posted by Will in Seattle | January 10, 2008 4:21 PM
14

Drug activity in "Drug Free Zones" carry higher penalties. The area around every school in the city is a drug free zone. Maybe that's why it was mentioned?

Posted by LH | January 10, 2008 4:22 PM
15

"There's probably more meds in those little kids backpacks to fill a Wallgreens anyhow."

Exactly. I've been wondering if those profitable ADHD meds are any less of a "gateway" drug than marijuana. Anyone funding studies on that?

Posted by Irena | January 10, 2008 4:24 PM
16

"Gee, wherever will we get our pot now?"

Uh, pot is impossible to find in Seattle to begin with. Anyone with half a brain knows that.

Posted by James | January 10, 2008 4:25 PM
17

@16 You apparently don't know ANYONE.

Posted by NaFun | January 10, 2008 4:34 PM
18

outdoor is shit

Posted by 420 | January 10, 2008 4:36 PM
19

@17:

Uh, thanks?.. No, I know plenty of folks. That's obviously not the issue. Embrace reality: pot's impossible to find here.

Posted by James | January 10, 2008 4:40 PM
20

#15 - Tuesday nights Frontline was re: the pharma industry's experiments on children (none of those drugs kids do are approved [or should be] for children as young as their prescribed for). Not really your question, but it was a great episode so I'm mentioning it should be on PBS' website.

Posted by Dougsf | January 10, 2008 4:48 PM
21

Huh. Pot's incredibly easy to find here. Wonder why the disparity. Speaking of which, I'ma'gonna fire one up right now and settle down to "3:10 to Yuma." Have a good'un.

Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty | January 10, 2008 4:50 PM
22

Oh, I remember the name now ... jPod - based on Stuart Copeland's book.

It's a really cool show, I recommend it.

But remember, don't eat the prize bud. That would be bad.

Posted by Will in Seattle | January 10, 2008 5:18 PM
23

I thought you were going to say this bust happened at American Apparel, which would explain all those bright lights.

Posted by Mahtli69 | January 10, 2008 5:25 PM
24

@21:

There is no disparity. For the average hard-working joe, pot just isn't easy to find here. Period.

But, enjoy 3:10!

Posted by James | January 10, 2008 5:35 PM
25

James--- I think you need to go to that slog-thing a Moe's and find yourself the hook-up

Posted by the bloop | January 10, 2008 5:51 PM
26

@25 - No doubt, James. I can assure you with 100% confidence that Seattle has an abundance of quality cheap weed.

Posted by Mahtli69 | January 10, 2008 5:55 PM
27

James, it might be time to work on your social skills if you can't find a hookup. "hard-working joe"? what the hell do you do? Every construction worker I know is major league stoner.

Posted by doink | January 10, 2008 6:10 PM
28

i just thought of the children and it reminded me of my first pot experience in middle school.

and how incredibly fun it was.

Posted by c | January 10, 2008 6:36 PM
29

@27:

I didn't mean to imply I was a construction worker. Anyone who has seen me knows I'd never be able to make a living in that field. But where I grew up, "average hard-working joe" meant "regular guy who gets up in the morning, goes to work, pays his taxes, and tries to do more good than harm." And other assorted stuff.

Still, trust me, I and every other "average joe" I know has had the same pot problem in Seattle. It's just that the rest of them moved have moved away to areas where pot is easier to find and buy. But I just can't yet tear myself away from this city quite yet.

Posted by James | January 10, 2008 7:11 PM
30

James, seriously what part of town do you live in and do you ever go out? At damn near every social event I go to in this town I smell pot. Just stand near the door of most bars and take a whiff of folks returning from *cough* smoke breaks.

If you're have trouble scoring in Seattle, there's something seriously awry with your copping skills.

Posted by gnossos | January 10, 2008 7:17 PM
31

@30:

Copping skills? That's slang I don't know.

I "go out" (whatever that means) a few times a week. I socialize daily, though I guess I don't go to the right places for "the hook-up" (which, oddly, meant "unprotected one night stands" where I grew up). This comments thread is a bit new to me, since my social skills have never really been questioned since junior high (back when EVERY person's social skills are likely questioned). It's odd, but I really don't give much thought to the discrepancy between how people claim Seattle is compared to how Seattle appears in my own experiences here. Well, that's sort of a lie, since I'm obviously giving it thought right now. But, I'll stop in a few minutes, when I put my shoes on and go out for the night. :-)

Posted by James | January 10, 2008 7:29 PM
32

i don't know anyone so that's why i had to quit.

Posted by maxsolomon@home | January 10, 2008 7:41 PM
33

James:
Chip on your shoulder or what??????

Might explain your inability to score...

Posted by Hal | January 10, 2008 11:36 PM
34

@33:

If you met me face-to-face, you'd never suggest that I had a chip on my shoulder.

Posted by James | January 11, 2008 7:32 AM
35

Hmm....this might be too late for you to read, James, but people here tend to be quite snarky/sarcastic without meaning any harm or offense.

Posted by Dianna | January 11, 2008 9:08 AM
36

Will @22, I know it's far too late for this, but it's Douglas Coupland. Stewart Copeland was the drummer for the Police.

Posted by Irena | January 11, 2008 10:22 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).