Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Golden Globes Canceled

1

I saw that coming the second Katherine Heigl announced she wouldn't be coming...

Posted by Amelia | January 7, 2008 6:11 PM
2

Shame..

Posted by Mr. Poe | January 7, 2008 6:13 PM
3

I hadn't realized they still held the Golden Globe awards at all.

Posted by Mahtli69 | January 7, 2008 6:26 PM
4

And the world continued to turn...

Posted by COMTE | January 7, 2008 6:28 PM
5

Oh god, no! Wait what are the Golden Globes again?

Posted by Giffy | January 7, 2008 6:34 PM
6

I keep waiting for someone to write a script about the writers' strike. But then again, even if they did, no-one could produce it because of the writers' strike....

Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty | January 7, 2008 6:40 PM
7

Awww, too bad. They really meant so much to me.

Posted by Pia Zadora | January 7, 2008 6:48 PM
8

I am sure some of the scabs would write something for the show.

BTW, Golden Globes are used by many to make Oscar predictions.

Posted by Just Me | January 7, 2008 6:58 PM
9

Makes sense. Without writers to provide scripted banter, the ceremony could easily become a tedious forced march, with viewers forced to endure an hours-long litany of Hollywood self-congratulation punctuated by the hapless presenters' feeble attempts at topical humor.

Posted by flamingbanjo | January 7, 2008 7:14 PM
10

And who really cares?

Posted by Reality Check | January 7, 2008 7:14 PM
11

i have never watched the golden globes in my life.
but if they revamped it as a completely adlibbed catastrophe, with resplendent Stars inanely babbling and fidgeting and making humane asses of themselves? i totally would.
pity the missed opportunity...

Posted by pretentious | January 7, 2008 7:26 PM
12

First, you guys temp me with stories about suicide. Now, you post this and leave me no other choice. I gotta find a rope.

Posted by bummed | January 7, 2008 7:42 PM
13

It's not so much about not having writers but that the stars won't show up since SAG supports the WGA's strike. Does Miss Golden Globe Rumer Willis get to host the press conference?

Posted by madamecrow | January 7, 2008 7:43 PM
14

Probably. The talent can show up for the news conference, as it was only the TV broadcast that was being struck, not the awards themselves.

Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty | January 7, 2008 8:14 PM
15

Well they haven't been the same since Pamela Anderson had reduction surgery, really...

Oh, sorry. Wrong golden globes....

Posted by Chris B | January 7, 2008 8:34 PM
16

OH NO!

Where will I go?!? What will I do?!?

Posted by NapoleonXIV | January 7, 2008 9:24 PM
17

Good riddance. They're worthless.

Posted by Gomez | January 7, 2008 10:00 PM
18

I think @5 said it best. Nobody really watches those, except during commercials when they're bored and flip thru channels.

Posted by Will in Seattle | January 7, 2008 10:13 PM
19

Where's Fnarf and his bleedhole?

Posted by Mr. Poe | January 7, 2008 10:25 PM
20

the only awards show worth watching, if only because everyone in attendance is clearly loaded.

how i long for the glory of boozy television, in the manner of match game pm, the gong show, and even late night with carson.

and, live television? fucking forget about it. the potential for things to go sideways is so deliciously great.

Posted by kerri harrop | January 8, 2008 12:55 AM
21

Sucks to be a Golden Globe nominee/winner this year.

Posted by lawrence clark | January 8, 2008 3:20 AM
22

Okay, I'm a bit culture lacking.

You've got the Grammy Awards, which is for Music.

You've got the Emmy awards, which is for TV

You've got the Academy Awards for movies.

You've got the MTV Movie Awards; the premier movie award of our time.

What are the Golden Globe awards? The only thing I can think is that it is somehow related to the Golden Girls. Am I close?

Posted by crk on bellevue ave | January 8, 2008 7:50 AM
23

@22 - Roughly 86 Hollywood foreign press correspondents who wield enormous power given that their choices are precursors for Oscar nominees and winners.

As an example, there are seven nominees for Best Motion Picture Drama this year; usually, there are only five (like the Oscars); this means there had to be several ties and that no one film nominee could have received many more than 15 votes.

But for award show junkies, the Globes are much more light-hearted and inebriated and the intimate setting in Merv Griffin's Beverly Hills ballroom provides celebrity coziness and faux sincerity.

However, the physical award itself is uglier than sin and looks like a stone dildo.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Globe

Posted by GOLDEN GLOBULAR FAN | January 8, 2008 10:28 AM
24

"Good riddance!" So harsh. The Golden Globes are not going away; they're simply revealing the winners without pomp, circumstance or the movers and shakers who once a year celebrate themselves for making movies most of us watch. Sounds like someone doesn't like Christmas.

Posted by TONY AND EMMY OSCARSON | January 8, 2008 10:54 AM
25

I love the Golden Globes show. It's the only one of the major awards shows where the nominees sit at their tables and drink for hours before their names are called. They'll say ANYTHING once they get onstage, because they're totally hammered by then. It's fabulous.

Posted by Geni | January 8, 2008 12:48 PM
26

As a member of the film makers union, I couldnt really give a rats ass. However, I'm still pissed I'm out of a job until someone gives them their fucking money.

Posted by catnextdoor in albuquerque | January 8, 2008 5:32 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).