<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Currently Hanging</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/currently_hanging_9</link>
<description> Ken Fandell&apos;s A Spider, Long Ago and The Same Spider, Shortly Thereafter, diptych, archival ink on paper (2008) At Howard House....</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:30:46 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:55:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by ugh.</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>motherfucker.  GROSS!</p>]]></description>
<author>ugh.</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/currently_hanging_9#c908994</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/currently_hanging_9#c908994</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:51:23 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phelix</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Uh... I've taken a very similar photo in my apartment. Wow.</p>]]></description>
<author>Phelix</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/currently_hanging_9#c909004</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/currently_hanging_9#c909004</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:00:09 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by boxofbirds</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I want to like this series, but I can't get past how badly shot these photographs are. When it comes to conceptual art the aesthetics of the piece should either enhance the idea or disappear entirely.</p>]]></description>
<author>boxofbirds</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/currently_hanging_9#c909006</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/currently_hanging_9#c909006</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:00:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by w7ngman</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"archival ink on paper"</p>

<p>Is that fancy art-speak for inkjet?</p>]]></description>
<author>w7ngman</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/currently_hanging_9#c909014</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/currently_hanging_9#c909014</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:08:55 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jubilation T. Cornball</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A great title piggybacking in on some crap art.</p>]]></description>
<author>Jubilation T. Cornball</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/currently_hanging_9#c909140</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/currently_hanging_9#c909140</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:27:54 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sylvie</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Is that a joke?</p>]]></description>
<author>Sylvie</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/currently_hanging_9#c909172</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/currently_hanging_9#c909172</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:45:38 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Fnarf</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>No, w7ngman @4, the fancy art-speak for inkjet is "giclee". "Archival" is just ad copy. The only reason one would care about the archival qualities of the ink is if you were buying it.<br /><br />
I agree with the assessment, though -- judging from this tiny clip, this is less interesting than a thousand pics I could find on Flickr in an hour or two.</p>]]></description>
<author>Fnarf</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/currently_hanging_9#c909259</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/currently_hanging_9#c909259</guid>
<category>Visual Art</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:55:08 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>